Validation of the ALK-Brain Prognostic Index for patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancer and brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BMs) are a key challenge in the management of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ALK+ NSCLC), but prognostic scores are complicated or rely on data before the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). This study aimed to validate the novel ALK-Brain Prognostic Index (ALK-BPI), which was originally proposed based on 44 TKI-treated ALK+ NSCLC patients from Karolinska University Hospital, using an external clinical cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TKI-treated ALK+ NSCLC patients with BM from Heidelberg (n = 82, cohort 1) were retrospectively analyzed alone and together with the original Karolinska cohort (n = 126, cohort 2). Cox regression models were used to determine the association of clinical variables and scores with overall survival (OS) after BM diagnosis (BM-related OS). RESULTS: Both cohorts showed a similar median age (58 years), roughly balanced sex distributions (52%-56% females), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0-2 for most patients (87%-92%) at the time of BM development, which were present already at initial diagnosis in 36%-38% of the patients. Most patients had received next-generation ALK inhibitors (54%-63%), while 55%-56% of patients did not receive any radiotherapy. The ALK-BPI identified poor-risk patients (i.e. featuring ≥ 2/3 risk factors: PS > 2, male sex, development of BM after initial diagnosis) with a significantly shorter BM-related OS than other patients in both cohorts: 32/82 in cohort 1 with 21.3 versus 62.2 months in median [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.5, P < 0.001]; 59/126 in cohort 2 with 23.1 versus 67.2 months in median (HR = 2.6, P < 0.001). The five-parameter Lung-molGPA score did not achieve statistical significance and/or clear prognostic separation in all four groups, while the Disease-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment score did not show consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: The ALK-BPI is a reliable tool for easy prognostic dichotomization of TKI-treated ALK+ NSCLC patients with BM in daily clinical practice, without the complexity of previous models.

Immune checkpoint blockade for non-small cell lung cancer: What is the role in the special populations?

In recent years, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) entered in a new era of anticancer treatments with the success of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). These are now part of daily practice from locally advanced to metastatic NSCLC. However, the registration phase III trials are highly selective and not fully representative of the patients seen in real-world clinical practice. This is particularly obvious for older and frail patients, which represent the majority of NSCLC cases worldwide. The median age of the patients enrolled in clinical trials is 10 years younger than what is seen in clinic and patients with performance status (PS) ≥2 were excluded from registration studies. No strong conclusions can be drawn from the available trials where older and frail patients have been excluded. The majority of data on efficacy according to age are derived from underpowered subgroup analysis and there are no age-specific safety data published. Current data suggest that older patients may derive a similar benefit with no increased toxicity when compared with younger patients. However, the recent development of immunotherapychemotherapy combinations and the potential higher incidence of toxicity, raise additional concerns for these populations where adequate patient selection is paramount. CPI is not recommended for patients with PS 3-4 and should be considered with caution for those with PS 2. The evidence for patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease (AID), organ transplant or chronic viral infections (such us viral hepatitis B and C or human immunodeficiency virus) is less clear and low level. Although CPI are potentially safe in selected patients with AID with minimal activity and well-controlled chronic viral infections, patients with solid organ transplant face a significant risk of graft loss and death. Therefore, a decision to treat these groups of patients should always be discussed at a multidisciplinary level.

Management of brain metastasized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) - From local treatment to new systemic therapies.

Lung cancer has the highest frequency of brain dissemination compared to all other solid tumours. Classical treatment options such as brain irradiation have started to be questioned due to lack of survival benefit and risk for severe side effects. Oncogenic driven tumours have the highest frequency of brain dissemination among NSCLC patients and available targeted therapies have shown activity both intra-and extracranially, with an acceptable toxicity profile. The recent approval of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of NSCLC has complicated treatment selection even more. Data regarding efficacy of immune therapy in the CNS are limited, though promising, and data from larger cohorts are eagerly expected. The purpose of this review is to summarize all available treatment options for brain metastatic NSCLC with an emphasis on oncogenic driven tumours. Treatment selection for brain metastasized NSCLC patients is challenging because of the detrimental effect of potential treatment related CNS side effects in patients' quality of life. Clinical decision making should be done in an individualised way, taking both clinical and molecular factors into consideration.

Paclitaxel-ifosfamide-carboplatin combination chemotherapy regimen in advanced uterine and adnexal malignant mixed Mullerian tumours.

BACKGROUND: Malignant mixed Mullerian tumours (MMMTs) of the uterus and adnexa represent aggressive gynaecologic malignancies with a high rate of loco-regional and distant failure. For that reason, we evaluated the paclitaxel-ifosfamide-carboplatin (TICb) combination in patients with advanced MMMTs. METHODS: Female patients with advanced MMMTs, WHO-PS 0-2, no prior chemotherapy for systemic disease, unimpaired haemopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered at the following doses; paclitaxel: 175 mg m(-2) on day 1, ifosfamide: 2.0 g m(-2) day(-1)--days 1 and 2, and carboplatin at a target area under the curve 5 on day 2, with prophylactic G-CSF from day 3. RESULTS: Forty patients of a median age 61 (45-72) years, performance status 0-2 with advanced MMMTs of the uterus (n=34), tubes (n=2) or ovary (n=4) have entered and all were evaluable for response and toxicity. Responses were as follows: 27 out of 40 (67.5%) evaluable patients responded, with 11 complete responses and 16 partial responses, while 10 had stable disease, and 3 developed progressive disease. The median response duration was 9 months (range, 4-40 months), median progression-free survival 13 months (range, 3-42 months), while median overall survival 18 months (range, 4-48 months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was recorded in 22 out of 40 (55%)--with 13 developing grade 4 (≤7 days) and 7 out of 40 (17.5%) of patients at least one episode of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: In this study, it appears that the TICb combination, yielded important activity with manageable toxicity in females with advanced MMMTs warranting further randomised comparison with current standard regimens.

Evaluation of the paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer represents an aggressive malignancy with a high rate of locoregional and distant failure. Therefore, we evaluated the three-drug combination of paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (TIP). METHODS: Systemic chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced metastatic/relapsed cervical cancer and a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (PS) of 0-2 were eligible. TIP chemotherapy doses were paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) on day 1, ifosfamide 2.5 g m(-2) on days 1+2, and cisplatin 40 mg m(-2) on days 1+2, with prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 56 (25-74) years; PS: 1 (0-2); histologies - squamous: 35, adenosquamous: 5, and adenocarcinoma: 2. Responses were overall response rate (RR): 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.3-76.7%), with complete response (CR): 26% (95% CI: 12.7-39.3%), and partial response (PR): 36% (95% CI: 21.5-49.9%). Responses according to the relapse site were overall RR: 32% (95% CI: 13.7-50.3%) within previously irradiated pelvis vs 75% (95% CI: 57.7-92.3%) in extra-pelvic sites. Median time to progression (TTP) was 7 (range, 2-34+) months and median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (range, 3-36+) months. Toxicities included grade 3-4 neutropenia: 83% (21% febrile neutropenia), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia: 9%, no grade 3 neuropathy (35% grade 2), grade 2 asthenia/fatigue 15%, and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: TIP is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity in advanced/relapsed cervical cancer.

Integration of novel targeted therapies into the systemic treatment of breast cancer--a review.

Over the last few years it has been anticipated that molecularly targeted agents can provide substantial improvement in the treatment of breast cancer. The most illustrative paradigm has been that of trastuzumab (Herceptin), a humanized monoclonal antibody against the HER2 oncoprotein overexpressed in 25% of breast cancers. Trastuzumab when combined with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy improved the outcome and survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer, whereas, over the last 2 years studies incorporating trastuzumab in sequence to or concurrently with taxane-based chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting demonstrated a considerable benefi t in this subset, with the results of longer follow-up regarding long-term outcome and late toxicities expected over the forthcoming years. Moreover, the prognostic and predictive value of topoisomerase IIa (Topo IIa) overexpression in these subgroups with respect to anthracycline treatment has been extensively discussed and analysed. Other inhibitors of both HER1/HER2 have recently been introduced with promising results and results of ongoing studies are awaited with great interest. A recently anticipated target in advanced breast cancer has been the pathway of angiogenesis; first a humanized monoclonal antibody-bevacizumab (Avastin)- has demonstrated encouraging results when combined with chemotherapy in pretreated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, while combinations with trastuzumab+/-chemotherapy are currently examined in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. Furthermore, as novel molecular pathways relevant to breast cancer biology are explored, it is expected that a whole array of targeted agents will be tested in combination or in sequence to standard chemotherapy with the aim to improve outcome of high-risk breast cancer patients.

Docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in patients with advanced breast cancer failing prior anthracycline-based regimens: results of a phase I-II study.

The established clinical activity of docetaxel and ifosfamide as single agents in anthracycline pre-treated breast cancer, led us to conduct a phase I-II study to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and clinical activity of the docetaxel+ifosfamide combination in this setting. Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer, after failure on prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy, were treated at successive dose levels (DLs) in cohorts of 3-6 with escalated doses of docetaxel 70-100 mg/m(2) over 1 h on day 1 followed by ifosfamide 5-6 g/m(2) divided over days 1+2 (2.5-3.0 g/m(2)/day over 1 h), every 21 days. G-CSF was added once dose-limiting neutropenia was encountered at a certain DL and planned to be incorporated prophylactically in subsequent higher DLs. Between March 1997 and December 2002, 65 patients with a median age of 57 years (range, 32-72) and performance status (WHO) of 1 (range, 0-2) were treated at 5 DLs as follows; 21 in phase I DLs (DL1: 3, DL2: 6, DL3: 3, DL4: 6, and DL5: 3) and the remaining 44 were treated at DL4 (total of 50 patients at DL4), which was defined as the level for phase II testing. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 62 for response. DLT (with the addition of G-CSF after DL2) was reached at DL5 with 2/3 initial patients developing febrile neutropenia. Clinical response rates (RRs), on an intention-to-treat basis, in phase II were: 56%; (95% CI, 42.2-69.7%); 4 CRs, 24 PRs, 10 SD and 12 PD. The median response duration was 7 mo (3-24 mo), median TTP 6.5 mo (0.1-26 mo), and median OS 13 mo (0.1-33 mo). Grade 3/4 toxicities included: neutropenia in 72% of patients, with 60% developing grade 4 neutropenia (

Dose escalation of docetaxel and ifosfamide in patients with advanced breast cancer failing prior anthracyclines: mature results of a phase I-II study.

PURPOSE: Single-agent docetaxel and ifosfamide are clinically active in anthracycline-pretreated advanced breast cancer. We conducted a phase I-II study aiming to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and the activity of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of 3-6 patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer after prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated at successive dose levels (DLs) with escalated doses of docetaxel (70-100 mg/m(2) over 1 h on day 1), followed by ifosfamide 5-6 g/m(2) divided over days 1 and 2 (2.5-3.0 g/m(2)/day over 1 h), and recycled every 21 days. G-CSF was added once dose-limiting neutropenia was encountered at a certain DL and planned to be incorporated prophylactically in subsequent higher DLs. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (median age 57 years, range 32-72) and performance status (PS) (World Health Organization-WHO) of 1 (range 0-2) were treated at 5 DLs as follows: 21 in phase I DLs (DL1: 3, DL2: 6, DL3: 3, DL4: 6, and DL5: 3) and the remaining 44 were treated at DL4 (total of 50 patients at DL4), which was defined as the level for phase II testing. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 62 for response. DLT (with the addition of G-CSF after DL2) was reached at DL5 with 2/3 initial patients developing febrile neutropenia. Clinical response rates (RRs), on an intention-to-treat basis, in phase II were 56% (95% CI 42.2-69.7): complete remission (CR) 4, partial remission (PR) 24, stable disease (SD) 10 and progressive disease (PD) 12. The median response duration was 7 months (range 3-24), the median time to progression (TTP) 6.5 months (range 0.1-26), and the median overall survival (OS) 13 months (range 0.1-33). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia in 72% of patients-with 60% developing grade 4 neutropenia (