Defining the surgical management for non-colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is indicated for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM), but it is controversial for non-colorectal liver metastases (NCLM). This study aimed to compare survival outcomes of patients with resection of NCLM versus CLM and to identify prognostic factors for resection of NCLM. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection of liver metastases at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from January 1989 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with resected NCLM were compared to those with CLM. Overall and recurrence-free survival were determined. Subgroup analyses with patients grouped according to the year of liver resection, from 1989 to 2004 and from 2005 to 2019, were conducted. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 674 patients included, 151 (22.4%) had NCLM while 523 (77.6%) had CLM. There were no statistically significant differences in median overall survival (65.2 vs 43.6 months, p = 0.555) and recurrence-free survival (12.5 vs 11.7 months, p = 0.425). The 1-year, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 89.8% vs 91.5%, 59.4% vs 58.8%, 50.6% vs 38.7% and 34.1% vs 26.3% in NCLM and CLM groups, respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated no statistically significant difference in overall survival between resection of NCLM versus CLM in both time intervals. In the NCLM group, better overall survival was found in liver metastasis of gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) origin (hazard ratio (HR) 0.138, p = 0.003) and with a longer time interval from resection of primary tumour to resection of NCLM (HR 0.982, p = 0.042). Poor prognostic factors were presence of blood transfusion (HR 5.588, p = 0.013) and post-operative complications of Clavien-Dindo Grade IIIa or above (HR 74.853, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of NCLM had comparable survival outcomes with CLM. With appropriate patient selection, the indication of liver resection could be expanded to NCLM.

Long-term survival in colorectal liver metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: Liver resection is the best treatment option for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). A 10-year follow-up can reflect the true curative potential of resection. This retrospective study investigated factors for long-term survival of CRLM patients. METHOD: Data of patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM without extrahepatic disease from 1990 to 2012 at our hospital were reviewed. Patients who survived for > 10 years were compared with those who survived for < 10 years. RESULTS: Totally, 315 patients were included in the study. They were divided into 2 groups: < 10-year group and > 10-year group. Patients in the < 10-year group had more tumor nodules (P = 0.016), more bilobar involvement (P = 0.004), narrower resection margin (P < 0.001), and worse disease-free and overall survival (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, low preoperative hemoglobin level, large number of tumor nodules, and bilobar involvement were poor prognostic factors for overall survival, while adjuvant chemotherapy was a favorable factor. Further analysis of patients with bilobar disease showed that perioperative blood transfusion was a poor prognostic factor for overall survival while adjuvant chemotherapy was a favorable one. In patients with multiple bilobar tumor nodules, adjuvant chemotherapy had a positive impact on disease-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who survived for > 10 years after liver resection for CRLM tended to have normal preoperative hemoglobin level, unilobar disease, fewer tumor nodules, and have received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy favorably affected long-term survival of CRLM patients.

A case report of tumor lysis syndrome after stage-one ALPPS.

RATIONALE: Tumor lysis syndrome is a potentially lethal condition caused by rapid cell death, releasing a high level of toxic cytokines. It is common in patients with hematological malignancy but rare in solid tumors. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 64-year-old patient presented to our unit with a 17.3-cm hepatocellular carcinoma and marginal liver reserve. The first-stage operation of associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) was performed. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was found to be anuric with grossly deranged electrolytes after the first-stage operation. Tumor lysis syndrome was diagnosed. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit for aggressive fluid administration and continuous venovenous hemofiltration for the management of tumor lysis syndrome. OUTCOMES: The patient recovered and then underwent the second-stage operation of ALPPS with extended right hepatectomy 8 days after the initial operation without any long-term sequelae. LESSONS: ALPPS is a relatively new technique in liver surgery, entailing an increased risk of tumor lysis syndrome due to an in situ tumor after the first-stage operation. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion regarding this potentially lethal complication with prompt management.

Routine use of ICG to enhance operative safety in emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that ICG fluorescence cholangiography (ICG-FC) helps to identify critical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and hence reduce biliary injuries and conversions. In LC, biliary injury and conversion often happen if the biliary anatomy is misidentified. METHODS: This was a single-center randomized controlled trial from 2017 to 2019. Patients with acute cholecystitis requiring LC were assessed for eligibility for the trial. Patients in the trial were randomized to undergo either conventional LC (conventional arm) or LC with ICG-FC (ICG arm). Conversion rate and biliary injury incidence were outcome measures. RESULTS: Totally 92 patients participated (46 patients in each arm). The median age was 61 years in both arms (p = 0.472). The conventional arm had 22 men and 24 women; the ICG arm had 24 men and 22 women (p = 0.677). The two arms were comparable in all perioperative parameters. The time from ICG injection to surgery was 67 (16-1150) min. Both arms had an 8.7% conversion rate (p = 1.000). The median operative time was 140.5 min in the conventional arm and 149.5 min in the ICG arm (p = 0.086). The complication rate was 15.2% in the former and 10.9% in the latter (p = 0.536), and both had a 2.2% bile leakage rate. The median hospital stay was 3.5d in the former and 4.0d in the latter (p = 0.380). CONCLUSION: ICG-FC did not make any difference in conversion or complication rate. Its routine use in LC is questionable. However, it may be helpful in difficult cholecystectomies and may be used as an adjunct. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered with the Institutional Review Board of University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster ( http://www.med.hku.hk/en/research/ethics-and-integrity/human-ethics ). REGISTRATION NUMBER: UW17-492.

Adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy for margin-positive resection of hepatocellular carcinoma-a propensity score matched analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatectomy is a well-established curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the role of adjuvant therapy is controversial. This study examines the efficacy of adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: The data of hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing curative hepatectomy was reviewed. Those with adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy were matched with those without using propensity score analysis, by tumour size and number, indocyanine green retention rate, disease staging and Child-Pugh grading. The groups were compared. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent hepatectomy received adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy (TAC group), and were matched with 870 patients who did not (no-TAC group). The groups were largely comparable in patient and disease characteristics, but the TAC group experienced more blood loss, higher transfusion rates, narrower margins and more positive margins. The two groups were found to be comparable in disease-free and overall survival rates. In margin-positive patients, those given TAC survived longer than those without, and margin-positive patients in the TAC group had overall survival rates similar to margin-negative patients in the no-TAC group. CONCLUSIONS: Margin involvement is an adverse factor for survival in HCC. Adjuvant transarterial chemotherapy may offer survival benefits to hepatocellular carcinoma patients with positive surgical margins.

Alpha-Fetoprotein in Predicting Survival of Patients with Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Resection.

Background/Aim: Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) had been used as a prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma but it was unknown what level of AFP could predict the survival of patients with ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) after resection. This retrospective study was to identify the best cutoff value of AFP for this prediction.Methods: Data of patients having hepatectomy for rHCC from 1989 to 2015 were reviewed. The receiver operating characteristic curve and Youden's index were used to identify the cutoff value of AFP affecting survival. The patients were then divided into two groups by the cutoff for comparison.Results: Totally 114 patients were included. An AFP level of 256 ng/ml was found to affect survival (area under curve 63.1%, 95% confidence interval 0.514-0.748, p = 0.027; sensitivity 0.6, specificity 0.706). The 114 patients were divided into Group A (AFP < 256 ng/ml, n = 56) and Group B (AFP ≥ 256 ng/ml, n = 58). The median AFP level was 13.0 ng/ml (range, 2-253 ng/ml) in Group A and 11206.5 ng/ml (range, 259-481,000 ng/ml) in Group B (p < 0.001). Group A had a larger proportion of patients receiving transarterial embolization at the time of rupture, and the time to hepatectomy was longer in this group. Patients in Group B had more blood loss, more complications, larger tumors, and more cases of macrovascular/microvascular invasion. Overall survival (p = 0.013) and disease-free survival (p = 0.024) were significantly better in Group A. On multivariate analysis, AFP ≥ 256 ng/ml was an independent risk factor for overall survival.Conclusion: AFP ≥ 256 ng/ml had an adverse impact on the survival of patients with rHCC after resection.

Transferability of Liver Transplantation Experience to Complex Liver Resection for Locally Advanced Hepatobiliary Malignancy-Lessons Learnt From 3 Decades of Single Center Experience.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of LT experience on the outcome of CLR for locally advanced hepatobiliary malignancy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite evolution in LT knowledge and surgical techniques in the past decades, there is yet data to evaluate the significance of LT experience in performing CLR. METHODS: Postoperative outcome after CLR between 1995 and 2019 were reviewed and correlated with LT experience in a single center with both LT and CLR service. CLR was defined as hepatectomy with vasculobiliary reconstruction, or multivisceral resection, central bisectionectomy (S4/5/8), or associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Spearman rank correlation and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to define the association between CLR-related outcomes and LT experience. RESULTS: With cumulative single-center experience of 1452 LT, 222 CLR were performed during the study period [hepatectomy with biliary (27.0%), or vascular (21.2%) reconstruction, with multivisceral resections (9.9%), with associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (18.5%)] mainly for hepatocellular carcinoma (53.2%), and hilar cholangiocarcinoma (14%). Median tumor size was 7.0 cm. Other features include macrovascular invasion (23.4%), and juxta-visceral invasion (14%). Major postoperative complication rate was 25.2% and mortality rate was 6.3%. CLR-complication rate was inversely associated with LT experience (R = -0.88, P < 0.005). Receiver operator characteristic analysis revealed the cutoff for LT experience to have the greatest influence on CLR was 95 with a sensitivity of 100% and Youden index of 1. Multivariable analysis showed that blood transfusion, prolonged operating time, LT experience < /=95 were associated with major postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: LT experience was complimentary to CLR for locally advanced hepatobiliary malignancy with improved postoperative outcome.

High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of liver tumors in difficult locations.

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been shown to be a valuable tool in the management of small liver tumors such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It has been shown to be a safe and effective means to ablate small HCC even in the presence of advanced cirrhosis. This review examines the challenges faced during HIFU ablation when the target tumors are located in difficult locations such as the liver dome, close to the rib cage, near large blood vessels or the heart, or adjacent to hollow viscera; and the special maneuvers employed to tackle such lesions.

Relevance of chemotherapy and margin status in colorectal liver metastasis.

PURPOSE: This retrospective, single-center study aimed to investigate the importance of chemotherapy and to come up with the optimal liver resection margin length for patients with resectable colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). METHODS: Patients who had undergone any form of liver resection for CRLM were reviewed and analyzed. The analyses were broken down into three parts: (1) overall effect of chemotherapy, (2) effect of chemotherapy with positive/negative resection margin, and (3) result of discriminative analysis with optimal margin length analysis. RESULTS: In total, 381 patients were studied. Among them, 279 received chemotherapy whereas 102 did not. Survival was significantly better in patients with chemotherapy (5-year, 43.6% vs. 25.8%) (p < 0.001). Patients who received chemotherapy (n = 93) with negative margins had better survival than patients (n = 8) with positive margins (5-year, 28.1% vs. 0%) (p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis, margin involvement was the poor prognostic factor for survival. Patients who had chemotherapy (n = 238) with negative margin showed a trend of better survival than patients (n = 41) with positive margins (5-year, 45.7% vs. 29.3%) (p = 0.085). Patients (n = 93) with negative margin and no chemotherapy and patients (n = 41) with positive margin and chemotherapy had comparable survival at 5 years (p = 0.422). On multivariate analysis, tumor number was the prognostic factor for survival. By the discriminant method, 1.09 cm (sensitivity 0.242, specificity 0.718) was determined as the cut-off for optimal margin length. Patients who had margin ≥ 1.09 cm (n = 81) enjoyed significantly better survival (5-year, 54.3% vs. 33.5%) (p = 0.041). On multivariate analysis, margin length ≥ 1.09 cm was the prognostic factor for favorable survival. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated the important effect of perioperative chemotherapy and negative margin liver resection in management of patients suffered from CRLM.

Pure laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver F4 cirrhosis without routine Pringle maneuver - A propensity analysis in a single center.

BACKGROUND: /Aim: Laparoscopic hepatectomy has been gaining popularity but its evidence in major hepatectomy for cirrhotic liver is lacking. We studied the long-term outcomes of the pure laparoscopic approach versus the open approach in major hepatectomy without Pringle maneuver in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis using the propensity score analysis. METHODS: We reviewed patients diagnosed with HCC and cirrhosis who underwent major hepatectomy as primary treatment. The outcomes of patients who received the laparoscopic approach were compared with those of propensity-case-matched patients (ratio, 4:1) who received the open approach. The matching was made on the following factors: tumor size, tumor number, age, sex, hepatitis serology, HCC staging, comorbidity, and liver function. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients underwent pure laparoscopic major hepatectomy for HCC with cirrhosis. Ninety-six patients who underwent open major hepatectomy were matched by propensity scores. The laparoscopic group had less median blood loss (300 ml vs 645 ml, p = 0.001), shorter median hospital stay (6 days vs 10 days, p = 0.002), and lower rates of overall complication (12.5% vs 39.6%, p = 0.012), pulmonary complication (4.2% vs 25%, p = 0.049) and pleural effusion (p = 0.026). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in the laparoscopic group vs the open group were 95.2%, 89.6% and 89.6% vs 87.5%, 72.0% and 62.8% (p = 0.211). Correspondingly, the disease-free survival rates were 77.1%, 71.2% and 71.2% vs 75.8%, 52.7% and 45.5% (p = 0.422). CONCLUSIONS: The two groups had similar long-term survival. The laparoscopic group had favorable short-term outcomes. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy without routine Pringle maneuver for HCC with cirrhosis is a safe treatment option at specialized centers.

Defining the optimal bilirubin level before hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In the management of operable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) patients with hyperbilirubinemia, preoperative biliary drainage is a measure to bring down the bilirubin to a certain level so as to avoid adverse postoperative outcomes that would otherwise result from hyperbilirubinemia. A cutoff value of bilirubin level in this context is needed but has not been agreed upon without controversy. This retrospective study aimed to identify a cutoff of preoperative bilirubin level that would minimize postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: Data of patients having hepatectomy with curative intent for HC were analyzed. Discriminative analysis was performed to identify the preoperative bilirubin level that would make a survival difference. The identified level was used as the cutoff to divide patients into two groups. The groups were compared. RESULTS: Ninety patients received hepatectomy with curative intent for HC. Their median preoperative bilirubin level was 23 µmol/L. A cutoff preoperative bilirubin level of 75 µmol/L was derived from Youden's index (sensitivity 0.333; specificity 0.949) and confirmed to be optimal by logistic regression (relative risk 9.250; 95% confidence interval 1.932-44.291; p = 0.005), with mortality shown to be statistically different at 90 days (p = 0.008). Patients were divided into Group A (≤75 µmol/L; n = 82) and Group B (> 75 µmol/L; n = 8). Group B had a higher preoperative bilirubin level (p < 0.001), more intraoperative blood loss (3.12 vs 1.4 L; p = 0.008), transfusion (100% vs 42.0%; p = 0.011) and replacement (2.45 vs 0.0 L; p < 0.001), more postoperative renal complications (p = 0.036), more in-hospital deaths (50% vs 8.5%; p = 0.004), and more 90-day deaths (50% vs 9.8%; p = 0.008). Group A had a longer follow-up period (p = 0.008). The groups were otherwise comparable. Disease-free survival was similar between groups (p = 0.142) but overall survival was better in Group A (5-year, 25.2% vs 0%; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, preoperative bilirubin level and intraoperative blood replacement were risk factors for 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: A cutoff value of preoperative bilirubin level of 75 µmol/L is suggested, as the study showed that a preoperative bilirubin level ≤ 75 µmol/L resulted in significantly less blood replacement necessitated by blood loss during operation and significantly better patient survival after surgery.

Anatomical Versus Nonanatomical Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Anatomical resection (AR) for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) is disputable. We investigated the impact of AR on short-term outcomes and survival in CLM patients. METHODS: Patients having hepatectomy with AR or nonanatomical resection (NAR) for CLM were reviewed. Comparison was made between AR and NAR groups. Group comparison was performed again after propensity score matching with ratio 1:1. RESULTS: AR group (n = 234 vs n = 89 in NAR group) had higher carcinoembryonic antigen level (20 vs 7.8 ng/mL, p ≤ 0.001), more blood loss (0.65 vs 0.2 L, p < 0.001), more transfusions (19.2% vs 3.4%, p = 0.001), longer operation (339.5 vs 180 min, p < 0.001), longer hospital stay (9 vs 6 days, p < 0.001), more tumors (p < 0.001), larger tumors (4 vs 2 cm, p < 0.001), more bilobar involvement (20.9% vs 7.9%, p = 0.006), and comparable survival (overall, p = 0.721; disease-free, p = 0.695). After propensity score matching, each group had 70 patients, with matched tumor number, tumor size, liver function, and tumor marker. AR group had more open resections (85.7% vs 68.6%, p = 0.016), more blood loss (0.556 vs 0.3 L, p = 0.001), more transfusions (17.1% vs 4.3%, p = 0.015), longer operation (310 vs 180 min, p < 0.001), longer hospital stay (8.5 vs 6 days, p = 0.002), comparable overall survival (p = 0.819), and comparable disease-free survival (p = 0.855). CONCLUSION: Similar disease-free survival and overall survival of CLM patients were seen with the use of AR and NAR. However, AR may entail a more eventful postoperative course. NAR with margin should be considered whenever feasible.

Vascular resection and reconstruction in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The aggressive approach of vascular resection plus reconstruction in curative resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) remains controversial. This retrospective study investigated its short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: Data of HC patients from 1989 to 2016 were reviewed. Operated patients were divided into two groups (with and without vascular resection) and compared in terms of perioperative results. Patients who had unresectable HC were also compared with patients who had been operated. RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent curative HC resection. They were divided into group A (without aggressive approach, n = 68) and group B (with aggressive approach, n = 22). The groups were comparable in all parameters including rates of overall and major complication and in-hospital, 30-day and 90-day mortality except that group B had more patients with more advanced disease (P = 0.008), more patients with tumour invasion of the vasculature (40.9% versus 7.4%, P = 0.001), and fewer patients with blood transfusion (27.3% versus 52.9%, P = 0.036). The groups had similar disease-free survival (group A: median, 17.9 months, 5 years, 27.4%; group B: median, 11.7 months, 5 years, 14.3%; P = 0.427) and overall survival (group A: median, 22.0 months, 5 years, 26.5%; group B: median, 26.5 months, 5 years, 14.7%; P = 0.90). Two hundred patients with unresectable HC were compared with patients who had received operation and found to have worse survival outcomes (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Vascular resection plus reconstruction in HC resection was feasible and safe and might improve the long-term survival of patients with advanced HC. This aggressive approach should be adopted if the expertise is available and the patient's condition allows.

Pure Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 110 Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Propensity Analysis at a Single Center.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term outcomes of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with background cirrhosis. BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatectomy has been gaining popularity, but has not been widely accepted, because published data were gathered from small numbers of patients. METHODS: Data of patients diagnosed with HCC and cirrhosis treated by hepatectomy were reviewed. The outcomes of pure laparoscopic hepatectomy were compared with those of open hepatectomy. Propensity score matching of patients in a ratio of 1:3 was conducted. RESULTS: There were 110 patients and 330 patients in the laparoscopic group and the open group, respectively. The laparoscopic group had less blood loss (150 vs 400 mL; P < 0.001), shorter operation time (185 vs 255 minutes; P < 0.001), and shorter hospital stay (4vs 7 days; P < 0.001). The median overall survival was 136 months in the laparoscopic group and 120 months in the open group. The 1, 3, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98.9%, 89.8%, and 83.7%, respectively, in the laparoscopic group, and 94%, 79.3%, and 67.4%, respectively, in the open group (P = 0.033). The median disease-free survival was 66.37 months in the laparoscopic group and 52.4 months in the open group. The 1, 3, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 87.7%, 65.8%, and 52.2%, respectively, in the laparoscopic group, and 75.2%, 56.3%, and 47.9%, respectively, in the open group (P = 0.141). CONCLUSIONS: Pure laparoscopic hepatectomy for HCC can be carried out safely with favorable short-term and long-term outcomes even in cirrhotic patients at high-volume liver cancer centers.

Outcome analysis of management of liver trauma: A 10-year experience at a trauma center.

AIM: To review the outcomes of liver trauma in patients with hepatic injuries only and in patients with associated injuries outside the liver. METHODS: Data of liver trauma patients presented to our center from January 2003 to October 2013 were reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of patients who had hepatic injuries only. Group 2 consisted of patients who also had associated injuries outside the liver. RESULTS: Seven (30.4%) patients in group 1 and 10 (28.6%) patients in group 2 received non-operative management; the rest underwent operation. Blunt trauma occurred in 82.8% (48/58) of the patients and penetrative trauma in 17.2% (10/58). A higher injury severity score (ISS) was observed in group 2 (median 45 vs 25, P < 0.0001). More patients in group 1 were hemodynamically stable (65.2% vs 37.1%, P = 0.036). Other parameters were comparable between groups. Group 1 had better 30-d survival (91.3% vs 71.4%, P = 0.045). On multivariate analysis using the logistic regression model, ISS was found to be associated with mortality (P = 0.004, hazard ratio = 1.035, 95%CI: 1.011-1.060). CONCLUSION: Liver trauma patients with multiple injuries are relatively unstable on presentation. Despite a higher ISS in group 2, non-operative management was possible for selected patients. Associated injuries outside the liver usually account for morbidity and mortality.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes Between Right Posterior Sectionectomy and Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Liver: A Single-Centre Experience.

BACKGROUND: Right hepatectomy (RH) instead of right posterior sectionectomy (RPS) is commonly performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic livers located lateral to the right hepatic vein in order to ensure adequate resection margin. This potentially increased the risk of postoperative liver failure. This study aims to compare survival outcomes and surgical morbidities between RH and RPS. METHODS: All patients between 2003 and 2013 with resection for solitary HCC in cirrhotic livers at segment 6/7 were reviewed. Baseline demographics, liver function, perioperative outcomes, and overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between RH and RPS. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were included in this study. Thirty-two patients had RH and forty-nine with RPS were selected as controls. Majority of the HCC patients (91.4 %) suffered from chronic hepatitis B. There was no significant difference in age, gender and Child-Pugh grade between the two groups. The median tumour size of RH group was 6 vs. 4 cm in the RPS group (p < 0.0001). Both groups had no statistical difference in resection margin and their associated morbidities. The 5-year OS for RH and RPS was 76 and 83.8 %, respectively (p = 0.766), whereas their corresponding DFS was 52.6 and 52.2 % (p = 0.859). Despite the discrepancy of tumour size among the two groups, there was no statistical difference in subgroup analysis based on their corresponding stage of disease. CONCLUSION: RPS can achieve similar OS and DFS as RH for HCC, and should be considered as the treatment of choice in order to optimise the postoperative remnant parenchymal liver functions.

Radiofrequency ablation versus transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinomas sized 5-8 cm.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective review was conducted to compare the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with that of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in treating large (5-8 cm) unresectable solitary hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). METHODS: Patients with large unresectable solitary HCCs primarily treated by RFA or TACE were reviewed. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints were tumour response, time to disease progression, and treatment-related morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: There were 15 patients in the RFA group. Of these, 12 achieved complete ablation, one had ablation site recurrence, and five developed complications. Median disease-free survival in this group was 13.0 months (range: 2.8-38.0 months). The TACE group included 26 patients, of whom four obtained a partial response, none achieved a complete response, and five developed complications. The median time to disease progression in this group was 8.0 months (range: 1.0-68.0 months). There were no hospital deaths in this series. Median survival was 39.8 months in the RFA group and 19.8 months in the TACE group (P = 0.257). Rates of 1-, 2- and 5-year survival were 93.3%, 86.2% and 20.9%, respectively, in the RFA group and 73.1%, 40.6% and 18.3%, respectively, in the TACE group. CONCLUSIONS: Both RFA and TACE are feasible treatments for large unresectable solitary HCCs. Both modes show comparable rates of complications and longterm survival, but RFA achieves better initial tumour control and results in better short-term survival.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy with vascular reconstruction for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with borderline resectability.

AIM: To analyze whether pancreaticoduodenectomy with simultaneous resection of tumor-involved vessels is a safe approach with acceptable patient survival. METHODS: Between January 2001 and March 2012, 136 patients received pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma at our hospital. Seventy-eight patients diagnosed with pancreatic head carcinoma were included in this study. Among them, 46 patients received standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (group 1) and 32 patients received pancreaticoduodenectomy with simultaneous resection of the portal vein or the superior mesenteric vein or artery (group 2) followed by reconstruction. The immediate surgical outcomes and survivals were compared between the groups. Fifty-five patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas without liver metastasis who received only bypass operations (group 3) were selected for additional survival comparison. RESULTS: The median ages of patients were 67 years (range: 37-82 years) in group 1, and 63 years (range: 35-86 years) in group 2. All group 2 patients had resection of the portal vein or the superior mesenteric vein and three patients had resection of the superior mesenteric artery. The pancreatic fistula formation rate was 21.7% (10/46) in group 1 and 15.6% (5/32) in group 2 (P = 0.662). Two hospital deaths (4.3%) occurred in group 1 and one hospital death (3.1%) occurred in group 2 (P = 0.641). The one-year, three-year and five-year overall survival rates in group 1 were 71.1%, 23.6% and 13.5%, respectively. The corresponding rates in group 2 were 70.6%, 33.3% and 22.2% (P = 0.815). The one-year survival rate in group 3 was 13.8%. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with simultaneous vascular resection was safe for pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: The short-term and survival outcomes with simultaneous resection were not compromised when compared with that of standard pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Pilot study of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation as a bridging therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients wait-listed for liver transplantation.

The objective of this study was to investigate the outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation as a bridging therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had been wait-listed for deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). Adult patients with unresectable and unablatable HCCs within the University of California San Francisco criteria who had been wait-listed for DDLT were screened for their suitability for HIFU ablation as a bridging therapy if they were not suitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Treatment outcomes for patients receiving HIFU ablation, TACE, and best medical treatment (BMT) were compared. Fifty-one patients were included in the analysis. Before the introduction of HIFU ablation, only 39.2% of the patients had received bridging therapy (TACE only, n = 20). With HIFU ablation in use, the rate increased dramatically to 80.4% (TACE + HIFU, n = 41). The overall dropout rate was 51% (n = 26). Patients in the BMT group had a significantly higher dropout rate (P = 0.03) and significantly poorer liver function as reflected by higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores and higher Child-Pugh grading. Clinically relevant ascites was found in 5 patients in the HIFU group and 2 patients in the BMT group, but none was found in the TACE group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.03, respectively). The TACE and HIFU groups had comparable percentages of tumor necrosis in excised livers (P = 0.35), and both were significantly higher than that in the BMT group (P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). In conclusion, HIFU ablation was safe even for HCC patients with Child-Pugh C disease. Its adoption increased the percentage of patients receiving bridging therapy from 39.2% to 80.4%. A randomized controlled trial for further validation of its efficacy is warranted.

Management of spontaneously ruptured hepatocellular carcinomas in the radiofrequency ablation era.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Spontaneous rupture of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a high mortality. The use of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in recent years has enriched the armamentarium for hemostasis of spontaneously ruptured HCCs but its results have not been documented. This study investigated the prognosis and outcome of spontaneous rupture of HCC as well as the results of using RFA for hemostasis. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From January 1991 to December 2010, 5283 patients were diagnosed with HCC at our hospital, and 189 of them had spontaneous rupture of HCCs. They were grouped under two periods: period 1, 1991-2000, n = 70; period 2, 2001-2010, n = 119. RFA was available in period 2 only. RESULTS: Hepatitis B virus infection was predominant in both periods. Surgical hemostasis was mainly achieved by hepatic artery ligation in period 1 and by RFA in period 2. The 30-day hospital mortality after surgical treatment was 55.6% (n = 18) in period 1 and 19.2% (n = 26) in period 2 (p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis identified 4 independent factors for better overall survival, namely, hemostasis by transarterial embolization [corrected] (hazard ratio 0.516, 95% confidence interval 0.354-0.751), hemostasis by RFA (hazard ratio 0.431, 95% confidence interval 0.236-0.790), having surgery as a subsequent treatment (hazard ratio 0.305, 95% confidence interval 0.186-0.498), and a serum total bilirubin level <19 umol/L (hazard ratio 1.596, 95% confidence interval 1.137-2.241). CONCLUSION: The use of RFA for hemostasis during laparotomy greatly reduced the hospital mortality rate when compared with conventional hepatic artery ligation.