ABSTRACT
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Tamoxifen is frequently used to treat ER-positive breast cancer. Our team has identified a novel splice variant of NCOR2, BQ323636.1 (BQ), that mediates tamoxifen resistance. However, the upstream factors that modulate BQ expression are not apparent. This study reveals that tamoxifen treatment causes induction of DNA damage which can enhance BQ expression. We show that DNA damage can activate the ATM/CHK2 and ATR/CHK1 signalling cascades and confirm that ATM/CHK2 signalling is responsible for enhancing the protein stability of BQ. siRNA or a small inhibitor targeting CHK2 resulted in the reduction in BQ expression through reduced phosphorylation and enhanced poly-ubiquitination of BQ. Inhibition of CHK2 by CCT241533 could reverse tamoxifen resistance in vitro and in vivo. Using clinical samples in the tissue microarray, we confirmed that high p-CHK2 expression was significantly associated with high nuclear BQ expression, tamoxifen resistance and poorer overall and disease-specific survival. In conclusion, tamoxifen treatment can enhance BQ expression in ER-positive breast cancer by activating the ATM/CHK2 axis. Targeting CHK2 is a promising approach to overcoming tamoxifen resistance in ER-positive breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Tamoxifen , Humans , Female , Checkpoint Kinase 2/genetics , Tamoxifen/pharmacology , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , RNA, Small Interfering/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Phosphorylation , DNA Damage , Checkpoint Kinase 1/genetics , Checkpoint Kinase 1/metabolism , Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
Biomarkers can be used for diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction in targeted therapy. The estrogen receptor α (ERα) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) are standard biomarkers used in breast cancer for guiding disease treatment. The androgen receptor (AR), a nuclear hormone receptor, contributes to the development and progression of prostate tumors and other cancers. With increasing evidence to support that AR plays an essential role in breast cancer, AR has been considered a useful biomarker in breast cancer, depending on the context of breast cancer sub-types. The existing survival analyses suggest that AR acts as a tumor suppressor in ER + ve breast cancers, serving as a favorable prognostic marker. However, AR functions as a tumor promoter in ER-ve breast cancers, including HER2 + ve and triple-negative (TNBC) breast cancers, serving as a poor prognostic factor. AR has also been shown to be predictive of the potential of response to adjuvant hormonal therapy in ER + ve breast cancers and to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC. However, conflicting results do exist due to intrinsic molecular differences between tumors and the scoring method for AR positivity. Applying AR expression status to guide treatment in different breast cancer sub-types has been suggested. In the future, AR will be a feasible biomarker for breast cancer. Clinical trials using AR antagonists in breast cancer are active. Targeting AR alone or other therapeutic agents provides alternatives to existing therapy for breast cancer. Therefore, AR expression will be necessary if AR-targeted treatment is to be used.
