Prospective Series of Transarterial Chemoembolization of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to the Liver with 30-60 µm Microspheres Loaded with Irinotecan.

PURPOSE: To describe safety and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to the liver treated with transarterial chemoembolization with HepaSphere™ Microspheres 30-60 µm loaded with irinotecan (ΙRI-HEP-TACE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective study (NCT04866290), 100 adults with confirmed mCRC to the liver who were ineligible for resection were enrolled and followed up to 24 months or death. Study outcomes among Salvage (patients not tolerating more cycles of chemotherapy) and Non-salvage patients included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response (OR), objective response rate (ORR), best tumor response (BTR), adverse events (AEs), and pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-camptothecin (SN38). RESULTS: The median age was 66 years (range: 31-89). Median OS was 15.08 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.33-17.25). PFS was 8.52 months (95% CI: 6.0-9.0; p < 0.001). ORR was 42.2% (95% CI: 31.57-53.50) and 35.9% (95% CI: 25.57-47.62) based on modified RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) and RECIST 1.1 criteria. BTR was not significantly different between mRECIST and RECIST (p = 0.745). The Non-salvage group had a statistically significant difference in median OS relative to the Salvage group (15.3 vs. 3 months; p < 0.001). Pharmacokinetic analyses demonstrated no correlation of OS with plasma concentration of irinotecan and SN38 (all p > 0.05). Most AEs were Grade 2 (257/279), the most common AE was right upper abdominal pain (180/279). One major AE (tumor rupture) was reported. CONCLUSION: IRI-HEP-TACE is an alternative treatment for patients with Non-salvage mCRC to the liver.

Prognostic significance of smoking in addition to established risk factors in patients with Dukes B and C colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic significance of smoking in addition to established risk factors in patients with Dukes stage B and C colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: 291 consecutive non-selected CRC patients were studied retrospectively. Twenty-three variables were examined using a regression statistical model to identify relevant prognostic factors related to disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: On multivariate analysis DFS was found to be negatively affected in patients with a smoking history of ≤10 pack-years vs. non-smokers (p<0.016). Additionally, performance status (PS)<90 (p<0.001), Dukes stage C (p<0.001) and elevated tumor markers (p<0.001) at the time of diagnosis were found to adversely affect DFS. Smoking also had a significant association with relapse. Patients with a smoking history of ≤10 pack-years had 2.45 (p<0.018) higher risk of recurrence compared to patients with no smoking history. OS was influenced by Karnofsky performance status (PS), Dukes stage, and elevated tumor markers. In particular patients with PS< 90 had a 4.69-fold higher risk of death (p<0.001) than patients with better PS. Stage C disease was associated with 2.27-fold higher risk of death (p<0.001) than stage B disease, and patients with elevated tumor markers at the time of diagnosis had 2.74-fold higher risk of death (p<0.014) when compared to those whose tumor markers were normal at presentation. CONCLUSION: Our study associates smoking and relapse incidence in non-clinical- trial CRC patients and reiterates the prognostic significance of PS, stage and tumor markers at the time of diagnosis.

How can we treat a patient with liver cirrhosis (hepatitis C virus), hepatocellular carcinoma, and synchronous colon cancer?

INTRODUCTION: The coexistence of liver cirrhosis with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colon cancer (Ca), which is a rare clinical condition, was treated in a liver transplant recipient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 46-year-old man, diagnosed incidentally during an ultrasound (US) examination with a 3.5-cm HCC in segment VII related to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), was referred for liver resection. He underwent a laparoscopic protocol evaluation for liver cirrhosis. Liver appearance and biopsy of the left lobe showed Child B/C liver cirrhosis. Because he fulfilled the Milan criteria, we suggested an orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). During protocol colonoscopy, we discovered an ulcerative sigmoid colon Ca. Three weeks after completing the pre-OLT assessment he underwent an OLT and was discharged home on day 9 on an immunosuppressive regimen of Everolimus, Myfortic, and Prezolone. Two months after transplantation, the patient underwent a sigmoidectomy and for nearly 1 month thereafter received chemotherapy for colon Ca (6 cycles of FOLFOX:Folinic Acid+Fluorouracil+Oxaliplatin). One and a half years after OLT, patient was in good condition but presented with an increased alpha fetoprotein (a-FP) without other findings. A couple of months later we discovered a colon Ca recurrence and 3 small liver metastases. Patient underwent a bowel resection with Hartmann's procedure. Almost immediately after the last operation, he was found to suffer multiple myeloma. He underwent chemotherapy for both malignancies with good responses, but a few months later died of severe sepsis. DISCUSSION: The relevant literature regarding treatment of liver cirrhosis complicated with HCC and synchronous colon Ca reveals poor and controversial outcomes. Our patient underwent chemotherapy immediately after colon resection in the presence of with a good functioning liver. Although his condition was satisfactory after OLT, the optimal treatment of such complicated patients is as yet uncertain.

Paclitaxel-ifosfamide-carboplatin combination chemotherapy regimen in advanced uterine and adnexal malignant mixed Mullerian tumours.

BACKGROUND: Malignant mixed Mullerian tumours (MMMTs) of the uterus and adnexa represent aggressive gynaecologic malignancies with a high rate of loco-regional and distant failure. For that reason, we evaluated the paclitaxel-ifosfamide-carboplatin (TICb) combination in patients with advanced MMMTs. METHODS: Female patients with advanced MMMTs, WHO-PS 0-2, no prior chemotherapy for systemic disease, unimpaired haemopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered at the following doses; paclitaxel: 175 mg m(-2) on day 1, ifosfamide: 2.0 g m(-2) day(-1)--days 1 and 2, and carboplatin at a target area under the curve 5 on day 2, with prophylactic G-CSF from day 3. RESULTS: Forty patients of a median age 61 (45-72) years, performance status 0-2 with advanced MMMTs of the uterus (n=34), tubes (n=2) or ovary (n=4) have entered and all were evaluable for response and toxicity. Responses were as follows: 27 out of 40 (67.5%) evaluable patients responded, with 11 complete responses and 16 partial responses, while 10 had stable disease, and 3 developed progressive disease. The median response duration was 9 months (range, 4-40 months), median progression-free survival 13 months (range, 3-42 months), while median overall survival 18 months (range, 4-48 months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was recorded in 22 out of 40 (55%)--with 13 developing grade 4 (≤7 days) and 7 out of 40 (17.5%) of patients at least one episode of febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: In this study, it appears that the TICb combination, yielded important activity with manageable toxicity in females with advanced MMMTs warranting further randomised comparison with current standard regimens.

Palliative gastrectomy and other factors affecting overall survival in stage IV gastric adenocarcinoma patients receiving chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with gastric cancer present with locally advanced or metastatic disease and usually receive palliative therapy. We sought to identify factors influencing overall survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer receiving palliative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records of 311 patients with histological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma were retrospectively reviewed and 17 clinicopathological and therapeutic parameters were evaluated for their influence on overall survival. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis nine factors were found to independently influence survival: no previous palliative gastrectomy [Hazard ratio (HR, 12; CI 7.969-18.099)], single agent chemotherapy instead of combination chemotherapy (HR, 1.35; CI 1.068-1.721), histological grade III (HR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.098-1.782), the presence of hepatic (HR, 1.6; 95% CI 1.246-2.073) and abdominal metastasis (HR, 1.33; 95% CI 1.039-1.715), CA 72-4 > 7 U/L (HR, 1.39; 95% CI 1.026-1.887), LDH > 225 U/L (HR, 1.72; 95% CI 1.336-2.236], need for blood transfusions (HR, 1.58; 95% CI 1.213-2.082), and weight loss > 5% (HR, 1.96; 95% CI 1.352-2.853) at the time of initial diagnosis. Patients were stratified as low (0-2 factors), intermediate (3-6 factors) and high (7-9 factors) risk and the median survival was 76, 40 and 11 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: Nine clinical and laboratory factors that adversely affect survival in patients with stage IV gastric cancer who receive chemotherapy were identified. Their concurrent presence seems to have an additive effect as patients with seven to nine factors have the worse prognosis. Palliative gastrectomy and combination chemotherapy appear to be associated with improved survival.

Evaluation of the paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (TIP) combination in relapsed and/or metastatic cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer represents an aggressive malignancy with a high rate of locoregional and distant failure. Therefore, we evaluated the three-drug combination of paclitaxel-ifosfamide-cisplatin (TIP). METHODS: Systemic chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced metastatic/relapsed cervical cancer and a World Health Organization (WHO) performance status (PS) of 0-2 were eligible. TIP chemotherapy doses were paclitaxel 175 mg m(-2) on day 1, ifosfamide 2.5 g m(-2) on days 1+2, and cisplatin 40 mg m(-2) on days 1+2, with prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer are evaluable for response and toxicity: median age: 56 (25-74) years; PS: 1 (0-2); histologies - squamous: 35, adenosquamous: 5, and adenocarcinoma: 2. Responses were overall response rate (RR): 62% (95% confidence interval (CI): 47.3-76.7%), with complete response (CR): 26% (95% CI: 12.7-39.3%), and partial response (PR): 36% (95% CI: 21.5-49.9%). Responses according to the relapse site were overall RR: 32% (95% CI: 13.7-50.3%) within previously irradiated pelvis vs 75% (95% CI: 57.7-92.3%) in extra-pelvic sites. Median time to progression (TTP) was 7 (range, 2-34+) months and median overall survival (OS) was 16.5 (range, 3-36+) months. Toxicities included grade 3-4 neutropenia: 83% (21% febrile neutropenia), grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia: 9%, no grade 3 neuropathy (35% grade 2), grade 2 asthenia/fatigue 15%, and no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: TIP is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity in advanced/relapsed cervical cancer.

CEA and CA-19.9 serum tumor markers as prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a retrospective analysis.

Most pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients present with locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis. in this retrospective study the authors evaluated the prognostic significance of the CEA and CA-19.9 serum tumor markers in advanced (unresectable) pancreatic cancer in correlation to other prognostic factors (demographic data, clinical parameters, treatment modality) and survival time using univariate and multivariate methods, in 215 patients with locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. median survival was 29.0 weeks, with 21.9% of patients surviving 36 weeks. Among 24 potential prognostic variables, 19 were associated with shorter survival. Multivariate analysis indicated that ten factors had a significant independent effect on survival: chemotherapy, surgery, tumor localization, elevated C-reactive protein, elevated CeA, CA 19-9 (>30 x nl), jaundice at diagnosis, weight loss >10%, distant metastases, and Karnofsky performance status. Patients who had only palliative therapy had a hazard ratio of 8.94 versus those who underwent palliative surgery and chemotherapy. Although certain clinical, biochemical and biological factors remain important predictors of survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, CA-19.9 serum tumor marker levels retain independent prognostic value for poor survival.

Efficacy of tropisetron in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin and taxanes.

Even though significant progress has been made, chemotherapy-induced emesis remains a challenging problem. Few studies focus on emesis in patients treated with carboplatin and the observation period is limited to the initial 24 h following chemotherapy. Thus, we investigated if tropisetron (T) monotherapy can adequately prevent acute and delayed emesis in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving a moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) (carboplatin-containing) regimen. Furthermore, we explored the merits of adding dexamethasone (D) or alprazolam (A) to T, especially in the setting of a pre-existing high level of stress. We studied 60 patients with advanced NSCLC receiving carboplatin and taxanes in three consecutive cycles. During the first cycle, patients received 5 mg of T intravenously before chemotherapy and the same dose per os on each of the following 3 days. In the second cycle, T was co-administered with 8 mg of D once a day, while, during the third cycle, T was combined with per os A 0.25 mg every 12 h and continued over the following 3 days. Finally, we evaluated the impact of stress on the anti-emetic response achieved with the previously described regimens. The combination of T + A was superior to T monotherapy and the combination of T + D, regarding the prevention of acute and delayed emesis. Both T + A and T + D combinations led to appetite improvement, while patients receiving T + A experienced sedation more frequently. Interestingly, subgroup analysis revealed that patients without underlying stress obtained no further benefit by the addition of A or D, while both T + A and T + D combinations led to a better anti-emetic response in patients with stress. In conclusion, T monotherapy provides a satisfactory result in controlling nausea and emesis caused by a MEC regimen in patients without stress. However, the addition of D and, mainly, A improves its anti-emetic effect in patients with obvious stress.

Topoisomerase I protein expression in primary colorectal cancer and recurrences after 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Our aim was to investigate whether chemotherapy with 5-FU induces an alteration in the levels of topoisomerase I (topo I) in colorectal neoplastic tissues METHODS: Twenty-five colorectal cancer patients were included in our study; these had undergone surgical resection of the primary tumor, received post-operatively 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy and then suffered from recurrences. In a standard three-step immunohistochemical procedure, a monoclonal antibody to topo I was applied in both specimens from each patient (one from the primary location and a second one from the recurrence). Statistical analysis was subsequently performed. RESULTS: Malignant cells from the recurrences displayed a statistical significant increase, concerning the levels of topoisomerase I, by comparison with the primary tumors (P=0.01). The increase in topo I levels did not demonstrate significant correlations with Duke's stage (Fisher's Exact Test P value=0.496), differentiation grade (P value=0.661), localization (P value=0.072), patient sex (P value=0.434), nor with relapse free interval (P value=0.493). There was a statistically significant relationship between the age of patients and increase in topo I levels (P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Topo I expression may be part of the malignant cells' phenotype in recurrent colorectal carcinomas, suggesting a potential role for Topo I in the acquisition of a metastatic phenotype. The increase of topo I immunohistochemical status is likely to be attributed to 5-FU and given the fact that high levels of topo I correlate with sensitivity to camptothecin, advanced colorectal cancer patients seem to benefit from topo I targeted anticancer drug therapy.

Docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in patients with advanced breast cancer failing prior anthracycline-based regimens: results of a phase I-II study.

The established clinical activity of docetaxel and ifosfamide as single agents in anthracycline pre-treated breast cancer, led us to conduct a phase I-II study to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and clinical activity of the docetaxel+ifosfamide combination in this setting. Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer, after failure on prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy, were treated at successive dose levels (DLs) in cohorts of 3-6 with escalated doses of docetaxel 70-100 mg/m(2) over 1 h on day 1 followed by ifosfamide 5-6 g/m(2) divided over days 1+2 (2.5-3.0 g/m(2)/day over 1 h), every 21 days. G-CSF was added once dose-limiting neutropenia was encountered at a certain DL and planned to be incorporated prophylactically in subsequent higher DLs. Between March 1997 and December 2002, 65 patients with a median age of 57 years (range, 32-72) and performance status (WHO) of 1 (range, 0-2) were treated at 5 DLs as follows; 21 in phase I DLs (DL1: 3, DL2: 6, DL3: 3, DL4: 6, and DL5: 3) and the remaining 44 were treated at DL4 (total of 50 patients at DL4), which was defined as the level for phase II testing. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 62 for response. DLT (with the addition of G-CSF after DL2) was reached at DL5 with 2/3 initial patients developing febrile neutropenia. Clinical response rates (RRs), on an intention-to-treat basis, in phase II were: 56%; (95% CI, 42.2-69.7%); 4 CRs, 24 PRs, 10 SD and 12 PD. The median response duration was 7 mo (3-24 mo), median TTP 6.5 mo (0.1-26 mo), and median OS 13 mo (0.1-33 mo). Grade 3/4 toxicities included: neutropenia in 72% of patients, with 60% developing grade 4 neutropenia (

A phase III randomized study comparing paclitaxel and cisplatin versus cyclophosphamide and cisplatin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

AIM: To assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer receiving the combination of cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) i.v.) and cyclophosphamide (700 mg/m(2) i.v.) (CP), or the combination of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) followed by cisplatin (75 mg/m2) (TP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients were randomized to receive six cycles of one of the treatments every 3 weeks. If measurable, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was determined. RESULTS: There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in the frequency of response (CR +PR) rates between treatment groups, in favor of paclitaxel containing regimen. The median PFS was 9 months for patients in the CP group and 12 months for patients in the TP group (log-rank p=0.215). The median OS were 24 months and 20 months in TP and CP arms, respectively (log-rank p=0.350). Neutropenia and alopecia were more severe with paclitaxel-containing regimen. CONCLUSION: Although OS and PFS were similar in two arms, TP regimen yielded superior response rates relative to CP, with an acceptable toxicity profile. Therefore, the TP regimen remains the preferred initial treatment option.

A prospective randomized study of irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) versus leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.

The purpose of this study was to compare the activity and toxicity of an irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) combination with a standard regimen of 5FU and LV, in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. One hundred and sixty patients were randomized; 80 patients (group A) received LV 20 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. on days 1-5, every 28 days; 80 patients (group B) received CPT-11 80 mg/m(2) (30-90 min i.v. infusion), followed by LV 20 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, every 8 weeks. The overall response rate was 30% and 47.5% in groups A and B respectively. Progression-free survival was significantly higher in the triple-drug combination arm (median 7.5 vs. 4.5 months; p= 0. 0335). However, overall survival did not differ significantly between the two arms (15 months vs. 14 months for the groups B and A respectively; p=0.3531). The main grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (19%, in group A vs. 35% in group B; p=0.032) and mucositis (2% vs. 14%; p=0.017). The regimen containing irinotecan showed activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The overall safety data confirm this combination as a well-tolerated treatment.

Screening of patients after colectomy: virtual colonography.

BACKGROUND: Virtual colonography is a powerful new method of imaging the entire colon and is useful to assess polyps and diagnose colon cancer. We evaluated virtual colonography in the postoperative screening of patients who had colon cancer. METHODS: Fifty-three patients were examined with virtual colonography 12 to 48 months postoperatively. Forty-four patients had received segmental colectomy with restoration of the gastrointestinal tract, and nine patients underwent abdominoperineal resection and permanent colostomy. After proper cleaning of the colon and distention with air, spiral computed tomographic examination of the abdomen with a slice thickness of 5 mm (table speed [TS] 10 mm, reconstruction interval [RI] 2.5 mm) was performed in the supine and prone positions (including intravenous contrast medium infusion). Images were transferred to a separate workstation (Philips Easy Vision) for postprocessing, three-dimensional rendering, and endoluminal viewing. RESULTS: Eleven recurrences (16.41%) were identified in 10 patients by virtual colonography, but one recurrence was missed. Conventional colonoscopy was incomplete in six cases, and two patients with colostomy refused colonoscopy. In these eight cases (15%), virtual colonoscopy was completed without problems. A second tumor in one patient who had received abdominoperineal resection was demonstrated by virtual colonography, but conventional colonoscopy failed to demonstrate the lesion. Liver metastases were identified in only one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual colonography seems to provide a good alternative in the follow-up of patients after colectomy. The technique is effective in the diagnosis of locoregional recurrences and distant metastases and is well accepted by patients, and results are equal to those of the conventional colonoscopy.

Methotrexate-paclitaxel-epirubicin-carboplatin (M-TEC) combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced bladder cancer: an open label phase II study.

The present phase II study aimed to define the application of a novel regimen incorporating methotrexate, paclitaxel, epirubicin, and carboplatin (M-TEC) in advanced bladder cancer, essentially as an M-VAC-like regimen, by substitution of cisplatin by carboplatin, doxorubicin by epirubicin and vinblastine by paclitaxel. Forty patients with advanced bladder cancer entered the study; 34 males/6 females, median age: 68 (range, 59-76), median PS (Karnovsky): 80, without receiving prior chemotherapy. Disease extention was as follows; 11/40 had local recurrence, 6/40 liver metastases, 14/40 lung metastases, bone and lymph node 8/40, bones-lymph node-lung metastases 4, lymph node and liver 4/40, lymph node-liver and lung metastases 2/40. Drug schedule and doses were as follows: paclitaxel 180 mg/m2, carboplatin AUC = 5 (according to creatinine clearance, based on Calvert's formula), and epirubicin 40 mg/m2 were administered during day 1, whereas methotrexate 30 mg/m2 and epirubicin 40 mg/m2 were administered on day 14. All patients were evaluable for response with 24/40 responding [response rate (RR) 60%]; 10/40 (25%) CR, 14/40 (35%) PR, 9/40 (22.5%) SD, and 7/40 (17.5%) PD. Symptomatic improvement was observed in 50% of patients. The median duration of response was 22 (14-32) weeks, median time-to-progression (TTP) 33 (12-44) weeks, and median survival was 56 (20-84) weeks. Toxicity was well accepted and was mainly neutropenia > grade 3: 17%, anemia >grade 3: 16%, thrombocytopenia > grade 2: 6%, nausea & vomiting mainly > grade 2: 31%, according to the administered chemotherapy cycles, whereas fatigue grade 2-3: 19%, neurotoxicity grade 1-2 13% of patients, and alopecia grade 2 was observed in all patients. The present pilot study indicates the feasibility of the M-TEC combination for bladder cancer with acceptable toxicity.

Dose escalation of docetaxel and ifosfamide in patients with advanced breast cancer failing prior anthracyclines: mature results of a phase I-II study.

PURPOSE: Single-agent docetaxel and ifosfamide are clinically active in anthracycline-pretreated advanced breast cancer. We conducted a phase I-II study aiming to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and the activity of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of 3-6 patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer after prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated at successive dose levels (DLs) with escalated doses of docetaxel (70-100 mg/m(2) over 1 h on day 1), followed by ifosfamide 5-6 g/m(2) divided over days 1 and 2 (2.5-3.0 g/m(2)/day over 1 h), and recycled every 21 days. G-CSF was added once dose-limiting neutropenia was encountered at a certain DL and planned to be incorporated prophylactically in subsequent higher DLs. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (median age 57 years, range 32-72) and performance status (PS) (World Health Organization-WHO) of 1 (range 0-2) were treated at 5 DLs as follows: 21 in phase I DLs (DL1: 3, DL2: 6, DL3: 3, DL4: 6, and DL5: 3) and the remaining 44 were treated at DL4 (total of 50 patients at DL4), which was defined as the level for phase II testing. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 62 for response. DLT (with the addition of G-CSF after DL2) was reached at DL5 with 2/3 initial patients developing febrile neutropenia. Clinical response rates (RRs), on an intention-to-treat basis, in phase II were 56% (95% CI 42.2-69.7): complete remission (CR) 4, partial remission (PR) 24, stable disease (SD) 10 and progressive disease (PD) 12. The median response duration was 7 months (range 3-24), the median time to progression (TTP) 6.5 months (range 0.1-26), and the median overall survival (OS) 13 months (range 0.1-33). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia in 72% of patients-with 60% developing grade 4 neutropenia (

Phase II study of gemcitabine plus 5-fluorouracil biologically modulated by folinic acid plus long-acting formulation of octreotide (LAR) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine, in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) biologically modulated by folinic acid (FA) plus a somatostatin analogue (octreotide acetate-long acting formulation-LAR) that can both inhibit the action of several growth factors and angiogenesis, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced symptomatic pancreatic cancer with measurable disease and median age 64 years (range 50-72) received the following combination: 5-FU, given at 350 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus, biologically modulated by FA 350 mg/m(2) on days 1, 2, 8 and 9; and gemcitabine, given by short i.v. infusion at 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. The regimen was administered every 3 weeks. LAR 30 mg was given intramuscularly every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Objective tumor response was documented in 7 out of 32 evaluable patients (all partial responses-PR), yielding a 22% response rate (RR) (95% CI 10.5-35). Sixteen (50%) patients (95% CI 31.4-60.8) remained with stable disease (SD), while 9 (28%) patients (95% CI 20.4-48.4) progressed while on chemotherapy. The median response duration (RD) was 7 months (range 4-18). The median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7 months (range 2-20), while the median survival was 7 months (range 4-29). The probability of surviving beyond 12 months was 20%. Of the 32 patients with tumor-related symptoms who were considered evaluable for clinical benefit response, 25 (78%) had pain improvement, while 14 (44%) experienced weight gain during treatment. In general, performance status improved in 16 (50%) patients during treatment. Serum concentrations of Ca 19-9 were decreased by more than 50% in 14 (44%) of the 32 assessable patients. Chemotherapy was well tolerated with mild myelotoxicity. Gastrointestinal toxicity was moderate with mild mucositis. CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine and 5-FU/FA plus LAR 30 was well tolerated and showed a moderate antitumor activity and a significant palliative effect on tumor-related symptoms. It would be interesting to evaluate in a randomized study the impact of octreotide administration on the palliative effect of the regimen.

Leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil versus levamisole and 5-fluorouracil as adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of 6-month therapy with leucovorin (LV)+5-fluorouracil (5-FU) versus 12-month therapy with levamisole (LVS)+5-FU, as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected Aster-Coller stage B(2) or C(1)/C(2) rectal cancer (RC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients with surgically resected RC were enrolled. Seventy patients with stage B(2) and 80 with stage C were randomly assigned to adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU+LXx6 months or 5-FU+LVSx12 months. Patient characteristics were equally balanced between the examined groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of LV 20 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) plus 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus every week plus LVS tablets 50 mg t.i.dx3 days every 2 weeks for 1 year. RESULTS: After a median follow up for survivors of 8.7 years (range 1.8-10.5), all of the patients were evaluable. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups with respect to the recurrence rates (p=0.821). Moreover, there were no significant differences between the two tratment groups in disease-free survival (DFS) (p=0.84) [B(2)(p=0.805) and C (p=0.978)] and overall survival (OS) rates for patients of either stage B(2) or C (p=0.78). Toxicities were more frequent in the 5-FU+LVS versus 5-FU+LV group: myelosuppression (grade 3 leucopenia, 12 versus 4%, p<0.04), diarrhea (grade 0, 60 versus 76%, p<0.02), and liver toxicity (increase of transaminases >3-fold, 12 patients versus 2, p<0.03.). No patient stopped chemotherapy because of toxicity, and there were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Adjuvant chemotherapy in RC with LV+5-FU for 6 months is equally effective and less toxic than LVS+5-FU for 12 months.

Breast cancer following curative chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and the effect of drug resistance proteins to the final outcome. A retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the overall survival (OS) of patients developing breast cancer (BC) after curative chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and to evaluate the possible effect on the patients' outcome of the expression of drug resistance-related proteins (P-glycoprotein-Pgp, multidrug resistance-associated protein-MRP, and multidrug resistance-related vault lung resistance protein-LRP) in BC issue. STUDY GROUP: 25 female patients (median age 60 years, range 37-70) who developed BC after chemotherapy for high/intermediate grade B-cell NHL, treated with CHOP and achieving complete remission (CR). This group was further subdivided in subgroups A and B, according to the time interval between NHL and BC development ( 24 months, respectively). A matched-pair group of de novo BC patients formed the control group. BC tissue was immuno-histochemically stained for Pgp, MRP and LRP. RESULTS: The median interval between NHL diagnosis and BC development was 26 months (range 9-49). In both groups 14 patients had tumor grade II; 16 were negative for steroid receptors; 17 overexpressed c-erbB-2; 14 were stage IIIA/B, and 11 stage IV. CMF or CNF (mitoxantrone instead of doxorubicin) were given for BC. Early progression was noticed in all study group patients for which second-line chemotherapy was instituted. There was a better response for stage IV patients in the control versus the study group (p=0.07). More prolonged OS was demonstrate for patients with stage III in the control group (median 51 months) and in subgroup B (median 47 months) than in subgroup A (median 16 months; p=0.00012), as well as for patients with advanced disease (p=0.0045). Development of BC < 24 months after NHL resulted in reduced OS (p=0.017). No difference was noticed in the expression of drug resistance proteins between the study and control group or between subgroups A and B. CONCLUSION: BC developing shortly after a CR to NHL is an aggressive disease variant with minimal potential for response to conventional chemotherapy. Analysis of Pgp, MRP and LRP failed to demonstrate significant difference between the study and control group, although indications exist that drug resistance mechanisms might be part of the aggressive disease phenotype, contributing to the poor outcome.

5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity is a rare, dose and schedule-dependent adverse event: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Cardiotoxicity associated with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) administration is infrequently reported in the literature, albeit case reports of acute coronary syndromes have been published. In the present study, patients undergoing 5FU chemotherapy were tested for the development of cardiac-related symptoms during its administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred twenty-two patients entered the study. Those experiencing any cardiac-related symptoms during 5FU infusion were subjected to electrocardiogram (ECG) and serum cardiac enzymes determination. If cardiotoxicity was confirmed, 5FU infusion was interrupted, sublingual nitrates administered and cardiac monitoring initiated, while patients with >2-fold enzyme elevation were admitted into a coronary care unit for at least 72 hours. Cases with acute myocardial infarction had to discontinue 5FU treatment. RESULTS: Overall 20 (3.8%) patients developed symptoms and/or ECG abnormalities due to 5FU. Patients with continuous 5FU infusion had a trend for higher incidence of cardiotoxicity (13/205, 6.3%) than the remaining (7/317, 2.2%; p=0.067). More specifically, increased toxicity was encountered in patients with continuous 24 h 5FU+ leucovorin (LV) infusion for 5 days compared to patients with the same schedule without LV (p <0.027) and patients with short 5FU+LV administration as well (p=0.024). Seven out of the 20 patients suffered acute myocardial infarction, 6 developed only ischemia, while ECG findings consistent with coronary vasospasm were detected in 4 patients and conduction disturbances in 3 patients (one subsequently died). CONCLUSION: The present study indicates a toxic effect of 5FU on myocardium, which is largely schedule-dependent. High level of alert is required when using this drug, while its toxic effect on the coronary endothelium and myocardium merits further investigation.

Acute abdomen as initial manifestation of M4 - acute non-lymphocytic leukemia.

Visceral involvement in acute non-lymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) seldom precedes hematological manifestation. We report on a patient with M4 - ANLL presenting with acute abdomen without any evidence of blood disorder. Laparotomy revealed only ileal wall oedema. Postoperative clinical deterioration led to a second-look operation combined with intraoperative endoscopy. Biopsied tissues were diffusely infiltrated by blasts characterised as HLA-DR (+), PGM1 (50% +), MPO (50% +) and CD 34 (-). Bone marrow reconfirmed these findings and showed positivity for CD4 (44%), CD11b (50%), CD11c (42%), CD13 (33%), CD34 (32%), and CD56 (54%). Chemotherapy achieved a complete but short remission. Relapse occurred 7 months later. Immediately after consolidation chemotherapy the profoundly immunosuppressed patient passed away after a lower respiratory tract infection. We discuss the contrast between histology and short disease duration, the unusual presentation and the bad prognosis, and attempt to correlate the clinical course with the coexpression of markers.