Reuse of Orthopaedic Equipment: Barriers and Opportunities.

¼ Reuse of orthopaedic equipment is one of many potential ways to minimize the negative impact of used equipment on the environment, rising healthcare costs and disparities in access to surgical care.¼ Barriers to widespread adoption of reuse include concerns for patient safety, exposure to unknown liability risks, negative public perceptions, and logistical barriers such as limited availability of infrastructure and quality control metrics.¼ Some low- and middle-income countries have existing models of equipment reuse that can be adapted through reverse innovation to high-income countries such as the United States.¼ Further research should be conducted to examine the safety and efficacy of reusing various orthopaedic equipment, so that standardized guidelines for reuse can be established.

Early Clinical Outcomes of "Lemon-Dropped" Complex Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients to a Tertiary Care Center.

BACKGROUND: In the era of value-based care, pressures lead to cherry-picking healthier patients and lemon-dropping riskier patients to higher levels-of-care. This study examined whether "lemon-dropped" primary total joint arthroplasty (pTJA) patients require increased health care resources and experience worse outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all pTJAs at one tertiary care center in 2022, excluding bilaterals, acute fractures, oncologic cases, and conversion hips. Patients were classified via referral pattern as simple or complex (referred for medical or surgical complexity). Primary outcomes were implant costs and any emergency department visit, readmission, reoperation, or complication within 90 days. Secondary outcomes were distance traveled to the hospital, anesthesia type, estimated blood loss, case duration, time in the recovery unit, length of stay, and discharge disposition. Outcomes were assessed via electronic medical record review and analyzed via Fisher's exact and unpaired Welch's t-tests. RESULTS: In total 641 pTJAs (322 hips, 319 knees) met inclusion criteria; 10.3% were complex referrals. Complex patients were younger (59 versus 66 years, P < .05) and more often non-White (41 versus 31%, P < .001), non-English speaking (11 versus 7%, P < .001), and had nonprimary osteoarthritis as a surgical indication (59 versus 12%, P < .001), but had similar Charlson Comorbidity Index and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores. Complex patients had increased odds of 90-day emergency department visits (OR [odds ratio] = 2.11, P = .04), 90-day complications (OR = 2.63, P < .001), and non-home discharge (OR = 2.60, P = .006); higher mean relative implant costs (1.31x, P < .001); longer time in the operating room (181 versus 158 minutes P < .001), time in surgery (125 versus 105 minutes, P < .001), and length of stay (3.2 versus 1.7 days, P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: "Lemon-dropped" pTJAs had worse early clinical outcomes and higher health care utilization, despite a control group with patients ill enough to utilize a tertiary care center as their medical home. Reimbursement models and evaluation metrics must account for these differences.

Augmented baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of outcomes and complications.

Background: Glenoid wear secondary to primary osteoarthritis or rotator cuff arthropathy is an obstacle commonly encountered by surgeons performing reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with numerous techniques devised to address this finding. The most recent of such techniques is the introduction of augmented glenoid baseplates to fill these glenoid defects. The objectives of this systematic review are to analyze clinical outcomes of augmented baseplates in patients with glenoid wear, including pain, range of motion, patient-reported functional scores, radiographic outcome measures, complication rates, and revision rates. Methods: Three online databases (Ovid Medline, EMBASE, Pubmed) were searched for studies publishing clinical and functional outcomes of augmented baseplates in primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Findings were aggregated and frequency-weighted means of these variables were calculated when applicable. Results: Seven studies comprising 810 patients were included in this review. The mean patient age was 72.1 ± 8.1 years with an average follow-up time of 41.4 months. Frequency-weighted means of improvement in forward elevation, abduction, and active external rotation were 53°, 47°, and 19°, respectively. Patients experienced American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and Constant score improvements of 45.9, 5.9, and 33.7, respectively. Pooled complicated rate was 6.4%, with 10 cases of baseplate loosening and 3 cases of instability. Five (0.6%) patients required reoperation. Subdividing among augment type (posterior, superior, posterosuperior), there were no apparent differences in outcomes or complication rates between directional augments. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrates that augmented baseplates for reverse shoulder arthroplasty provide positive outcomes both clinically and functionally at early follow-up. Complications are within an acceptable range for primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with a low rate of revision. Augmented baseplates should serve as a viable option for surgeons seeking to address glenoid wear during reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Increased Risk of Recurring Complications.

BACKGROUND: As the demand for knee arthroplasty increases, risk assessment and counseling are critical for optimal patient outcomes perioperatively. The purpose of this study was to determine if specific complications occurring after unilateral knee replacement predict the risk of recurrence after a staged replacement of the contralateral knee for patients with bilateral symptomatic disease. METHODS: Linked, nationwide data from the U.S. Hospital Cost and Utilization Project from 2005 to 2014 were used to measure the occurrence of complications after the first and second procedures in staged bilateral total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Odds ratios (ORs) and conditional probabilities were determined to assess whether having a specific complication after the first TKA increased the chance that the same complication occurred after the second procedure. RESULTS: A total of 36,278 patients who underwent staged bilateral TKAs were analyzed. All complications occurring after the first arthroplasty were associated with both a significantly increased probability and odds of recurrence following the second arthroplasty. These included myocardial infarction (OR, 56.63 [95% confidence interval (CI), 18.04 to 155.44]; p < 0.001), ischemic stroke (OR, 41.38 [95% CI, 1.98 to 275.82]; p = 0.03), other cardiac complications (OR, 7.73 [95% CI, 4.24 to 14.11]; p < 0.001), respiratory complications (OR, 8.58 [95% CI, 2.85 to 23.17]; p = 0.002), urinary complications (OR, 11.19 [95% CI, 5.44 to 22.25]; p = 0.001), hematoma (OR, 15.05 [95% CI, 7.90 to 27.27]; p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (OR, 7.40 [95% CI, 5.37 to 10.08]; p < 0.001), and pulmonary embolism (OR, 11.00 [95% CI, 5.01 to 23.92]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Medical complications that occur postoperatively after TKA are associated with a significantly increased risk of recurrence of these complications after staged replacement of the contralateral knee. Although overall complication rates remain low, patients who develop these medical complications after the first replacement should be counseled on their increased risk profile prior to the contralateral surgical procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Bilateral Simultaneous vs Staged Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Difference in Perioperative Risks.

BACKGROUND: With the rising utilization of total joint arthroplasty, the role of simultaneous-bilateral surgery will have an expanding impact. The purpose of this study is to examine the risks of perioperative complications with this approach in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), to inform shared decision-making. METHODS: We reviewed national hospital discharge data from 2005 to 2014 to compare outcomes between simultaneous-bilateral TKAs (sim-BTKAs) and staged-bilateral TKAs (staged-BTKAs). Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for confounders. Outcomes analyzed included mortality, various medical complications, knee infection, and mechanical complications. RESULTS: This study analyzed 27,301 sim-BTKAs and 45,419 staged-BTKAs. Patients who underwent simultaneous surgery had a statistically significant higher adjusted odds of mortality, cardiac events, thromboembolic events, and complications involving the urinary and digestive systems, and a lower adjusted odds of deep knee infection and hematoma. Thirteen of the 14 complications had overall incidences less than 2% and 1 outcome had an incidence of 3%. The absolute between-group risk difference for any complication was 1% or less. CONCLUSION: Sim-BTKAs have a statistically significant increased odds of multiple complications compared to staged-BTKAs. However, the absolute risk differences between these options are minimal and the occurrence of any complication is low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Quantification of PD-L1 and PD-1 expression on tumor and immune cells in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using non-enzymatic tissue dissociation and flow cytometry.

OBJECTIVE: We report a truly quantitative technology for PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, we present a non-enzymatic technology that creates a cell suspension from fresh tumor tissue so that either fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or fresh tissue can be used in this assay. METHODS: Non-enzymatic tissue homogenization (IncellPREP; IncellDx, Menlo Park, California) was performed on 4-mm punch biopsies. An FNA was taken from the same tumor to create matched sample sets. Cells were labeled with antibodies directed against CD45, PD-1, and PD-L1 and then stained with DAPI to identify intact, single cells, and to analyze cell cycle. RESULTS: Comparing the IncellPREP homogenization and FNA demonstrated a strong correlation (r 2 - 0.8) for expression of PD-L1. We compared PD-L1 expression by flow cytometry using a 1 % cutoff for positivity in the tumor cell population and a 1 % cutoff of cells with at least 1+ intensity in immunohistochemically stained tissue sections as positive. Ten of 12 lung tumor samples were concordant while 2 were discordant. PD-L1 expression by flow cytometry varied widely (1.2-89.4 %) even in the positive concordant cases. In addition, PD-L1 expression in the aneuploid tumor population did not necessarily agree with the expression in the diploid tumor population. Fine, unequivocal quantification of PD-L1 on tumor and immune cells in NSCLC may allow for better prediction of response to therapies. The present study also offers a technology that can create a universal sample type from either FNA or fresh tissue.

Factors Associated with Patient Press Ganey Satisfaction Scores for Ophthalmology Patients.

PURPOSE: To determine which metrics from the Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey best correlate with "likelihood to recommend" among patients in an academic tertiary medical center practice setting. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Over a 3-month period, patients presenting to an academic practice who agreed to participate were enrolled in the study if they met the following entry criteria: (1) age ≥18 years, (2) ability to read and speak English, and (3) followed in this practice between 4 months and 4 years. A total of 196 patients were recruited. METHODS: A 26-item abridged version of the Press Ganey survey typically distributed to patients via mail or e-mail after visiting the Stanford University Hospital was administered privately to each eligible patient of 2 different attending clinics at the conclusion of his or her visit. The 26 survey items were not modified for the purposes of the study and were administered such that participants could not be individually identified. The arithmetic mean score for the item "Likelihood of your recommending our practice to others" was calculated by assigning a value (0-100) to the Likert value associated with survey responses and correlated with the 25 other items using the differences in the mean scores. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response to survey items graded on a 1 to 5 standard Likert scale. RESULTS: The weighted mean patient survey score for the "likelihood to recommend" item for the junior faculty member was 95.9% and for the senior faculty member was 94.5%, respectively. For the remaining 25 items, "Amount of time the care provider spent with you" (Diff[1-2]=1.03; P < 0.0001) and "Ease of scheduling your appointment" (Diff[1-2]=0.99; P < 0.0001) best correlated with likelihood to recommend. In contrast, "Friendliness/courtesy of the care provider" (Diff[1-2]=0.29; P = 0.0045) correlated least with likelihood to recommend. Stratification based on provider did not affect the study results. CONCLUSIONS: The perception of time spent with the practitioner and ease of appointment scheduling are the 2 variables that best correlate with patients recommending their ophthalmologists to other prospective patients.