Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Anesthesiology ; 141(1): 75-86, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502917

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is associated with a high risk of bleeding complications. The specific impact of ECMO on fibrinolysis remains unexplored. The objective of the current pilot observational prospective study was to investigate the longitudinal dynamics of fibrinolytic markers-i.e., changes over time-in the context of bleeding events in patients on ECMO. METHODS: Longitudinal dynamics of contact phase components (kininogen and bradykinin) and fibrinolysis markers (tissue plasminogen activator [tPA], plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI-1], their complexes [tPA•PAI-1], plasmin-antiplasmin complexes, plasminogen, and D-dimer) were measured in patients undergoing venovenous and venoarterial ECMO, before implantation, at 0, 6, and 12 h after implantation, and daily thereafter. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 30 patients (214 ECMO days). The concentrations of tPA, D-dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin complexes, PAI-1, and tPA•PAI-1 complexes were increased, whereas plasminogen decreased compared to normal values. A noteworthy divergence was observed between hemorrhagic and nonhemorrhagic patients: in bleeding patients, D-dimer, plasmin-antiplasmin, tPA, PAI-1, and tPA•PAI-1 followed an increasing kinetics before hemorrhage and then decreased to their baseline level; conversely, nonbleeding patients showed a decreasing kinetics in these markers. Also, D-dimer and tPA followed an increasing kinetics in bleeding patients compared to nonbleeding patients (median values for D-dimer dynamics: 1,080 vs. -440 ng/ml, P = 0.05; tPA dynamics: 0.130 vs. 0.100 nM, P = 0.038), and both markers significantly increased the day before hemorrhage. A tPA concentration above 0.304 nM was associated with bleeding events (odds ratio, 4.92; 95% CI, 1.01 to 24.08; P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: Contact activation induces fibrinolysis in ECMO patients, especially in patients experiencing bleeding. This finding supports the role of this mechanism as a possible causal factor for hemorrhages during ECMO and open new avenues for novel therapeutic perspectives.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Fibrinolysis , Humans , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Pilot Projects , Fibrinolysis/physiology , Prospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/blood , Hemorrhage/therapy , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/blood , Biomarkers/blood , Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1/blood , Aged , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/analysis , Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products/metabolism , Cohort Studies
2.
J Innate Immun ; 16(1): 216-225, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38461810

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Toll-like receptors play crucial roles in the sepsis-induced systemic inflammatory response. Septic shock mortality correlates with overexpression of neutrophilic TLR2 and TLR9, while the role of TLR4 overexpression remains a debate. In addition, TLRs are involved in the pathogenesis of viral infections such as COVID-19, where the single-stranded RNA of SARS-CoV-2 is recognized by TLR7 and TLR8, and the spike protein activates TLR4. METHODS: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of TLRs 1-10 expressions in white blood cells from 71 patients with bacterial and viral infections. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on disease type and severity (sepsis, septic shock, moderate, and severe COVID-19) and compared to 7 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: We observed a significant reduction in the expression of TLR4 and its co-receptor CD14 in septic shock neutrophils compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Severe COVID-19 patients exhibited a significant increase in TLR3 and TLR7 levels in neutrophils compared to controls (p < 0.05). Septic shock patients also showed a similar increase in TLR7 in neutrophils along with elevated intermediate monocytes (CD14+CD16+) compared to the control group (p < 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). However, TLR expression remained unchanged in lymphocytes. CONCLUSION: This study provides further insights into the mechanisms of TLR activation in various infectious conditions. Additional analysis is needed to assess their correlation with patient outcome and to evaluate the impact of TLR-pathway modulation during septic shock and severe COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Toll-Like Receptor 10 , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Bacterial Infections/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/blood , Leukocytes/immunology , Leukocytes/metabolism , Lipopolysaccharide Receptors/metabolism , Neutrophils/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Sepsis/immunology , Shock, Septic/immunology , Shock, Septic/blood , Toll-Like Receptor 1/metabolism , Toll-Like Receptor 1/genetics , Toll-Like Receptor 7/metabolism , Toll-Like Receptor 7/genetics , Toll-Like Receptors/metabolism , Aged, 80 and over
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...