Application of the quality index methodology for dosimetric verification of build-up effect beyond air-tissue interface in treatment planning system algorithms.

We have designed a simple benchmark test for the user of a treatment planning system to check the calculation algorithm's ability to model the build up effect beyond an air/tissue interface. The expected result is expressed as an inhomogeneity correction factor CF derived from measurements and from Monte Carlo calculations for a full range of photon beam qualities. The linear regression lines obtained from plotting CF as a function of beam quality index form the basis for a quantitative check of the algorithm performance.

Monte Carlo dosimetric evaluation of high energy vs low energy photon beams in low density tissues.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Low megavoltage photon beams are often the treatment choice in radiotherapy when low density heterogeneities are involved, because higher energies show some undesirable dosimetric effects. This work is aimed at investigating the effects of different energy selection for low density tissues. PATIENTS AND METHODS: BEAMnrc was used to simulate simple treatment set-ups in a simple and a CT reconstructed lung phantom and an air-channel phantom. The dose distribution of 6, 15 and 20 MV photon beams was studied using single, AP/PA and three-field arrangements. RESULTS: Our results showed no significant changes in the penumbra width in lung when a pair of opposed fields were used. The underdosage at the anterior/posterior tumor edge caused by the dose build-up at the lung-tumor interface reached 7% for a 5 x 5 cm AP/PA set-up. Shrinkage of the 90% isodose volume was noticed for the same set-up, which could be rectified by adding a lateral field. For the CT reconstructed phantom, the AP/PA set-up offered better tumor coverage when lower energies were used but for the three field set-up, higher energies resulted to better sparing of the lung tissue. For the air-channel set-up, adding an opposed field reduced the penumbra width. Using higher energies resulted in a 7% cold spot around the air-tissue interface for a 5 x 5 cm field. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of energy for treatment in the low density areas is not a straightforward decision but depends on a number of parameters such as the beam set-up and the dosimetric criteria. Updated calculation algorithms should be used in order to be confident for the choice of energy of treatment.

Analysis of the penumbra enlargement in lung versus the quality index of photon beams: a methodology to check the dose calculation algorithm.

It is well known that considerable underdosage can occur at the edges of a tumor inside the lung because of the degradation of penumbra due to lack of lateral electronic equilibrium. Although present even at smaller energies, this phenomenon is more pronounced for higher energies. Apart from Monte Carlo calculation, most of the existing Treatment Planning Systems (TPSs) cannot deal at all, or with acceptable accuracy, with this effect. A methodology has been developed for assessing the dose calculation algorithms in the lung region where lateral electronic disequilibrium exists, based on the Quality Index (QI) of the incident beam. A phantom, consisting of layers of polystyrene and lung material, has been irradiated using photon beams of 4, 6, 15, and 20 MV. The cross-plane profiles of each beam for 5x5, 10x10, and 25x10 fields have been measured at the middle of the phantom with the use of films. The penumbra (20%-80%) and fringe (50%-90%) enlargement was measured and the ratio of the widths for the lung to that of polystyrene was defined as the Correction Factor (CF). Monte Carlo calculations in the two phantoms have also been performed for energies of 6, 15, and 20 MV. Five commercial TPS's algorithms were tested for their ability to predict the penumbra and fringe enlargement. A linear relationship has been found between the QI of the beams and the CF of the penumbra and fringe enlargement for all the examined fields. Monte Carlo calculations agree very well (less than 1% difference) with the film measurements. The CF values range between 1.1 for 4 MV (QI 0.620) and 2.28 for 20 MV (QI 0.794). Three of the tested TPS's algorithms could not predict any enlargement at all for all energies and all fields and two of them could predict the penumbra enlargement to some extent. The proposed methodology can help any user or developer to check the accuracy of its algorithm for lung cases, based on a simple phantom geometry and the QI of the incident beam. This check is very important especially when higher energies are used, as the inaccuracies in existing algorithms can lead to an incorrect choice of energy for lung treatment and consequently to a failure in tumor control.