Five-year overall survival of patients with advanced bladder cancer in Kazakhstan: OSURK registry study.

BACKGROUND: The goals of the OSURK registry study were to assess 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer diagnosed in 2017 in Kazakhstan and collect data on the use of various treatment options in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed metastatic bladder cancer (BC) were retrospectively identified in the national register of Kazakhstan (ERCP) between January 2017 and January 2018. ERCP is the biggest register in the country and includes patient data from 17 regions. Investigators collected patient information and processed records online on the following anonymised data: demographical characteristics, received treatment and outcomes. Patients were included in the study if mBC was confirmed histologically and they had at least one visit to the cancer center during the follow-up period. The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), patient characteristics and treatment patterns. RESULTS: Totally 480 adult patients with metastatic BC were included. Mean number of patients in one region per year was 28.2. Median age at diagnosis of mBC was 70.0 years (range, 30-100). Patients were predominantly male (81.3%), histological subtype of BC (urothelial carcinoma, etc.) was determined in 41%. Overall, 187 (39%) patients received systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Platinum-based chemotherapy was prescribed in 147 (76.8%) patients who received systemic treatment. The majority of treatment was with cisplatin (N=132, 70.6%). Sixty-four (13.3%) patients received ≥2 treatment lines. After median 60.5 months of follow-up the 5-year OS in patients with metastatic BC was 2.7%. The 1-, and 3-year OS rates were 31.0% and 9.8%, respectively. Median OS from the start of treatment was 7.3 months (95% CI 6.5-8.1). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the OSURK study indicate the need for further implementation of innovative drugs in real practice in order to significantly increase the OS of patients with metastatic BC.

Immunotherapy in cancer patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection.

Disease management in challenging patient population with cancer and concomitant serious conditions presents an unmet clinical need. The major gap is the lack of data from properly designed trials that could support clinical decisions. Despite many advances in the fields of oncology, immunology, and infectious diseases, chronic viral infections in cancer patients remain to some extent terra incognita. Therefore, many patients lose the opportunity to receive the most advanced therapy, and physicians are compelled to make treatment decisions without sufficient evidence. In this review, we discuss the utility of immunotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C viral infection. Limited data from several studies and case reports support the hypothesis that immune checkpoint inhibitors can be used safely and effectively in this patient population. Available results warrant further investigation of immunotherapy in infected patients. Taking into account the current state of our knowledge, expanding clinical trial eligibility should be considered by investigators and sponsors to allow patient access to novel therapies and better matching of clinical research to the real-world population.

Adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma in 2023: hopes and disappointments.

PURPOSE: It is known that 30% of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC) will develop progressive disease after surgical treatment. These patients with high-risk ccRCC require adjuvant therapy after nephrectomy or resection of metastases. The article presents an overview of the results of recent studies in adjuvant therapy. METHODS: We analyzed the results of randomized trials of targeted therapy and checkpoint inhibitors in high-risk ccRCC patients. RESULTS: Targeted therapy did not significantly reduce this risk or/and did not affect overall survival. Three randomized studies investigating nivolumab, ipilimumab, and atezolizumab in the adjuvant setting also failed without improving disease-free survival. Pembrolizumab had a significant impact on the disease-free survival in the entire population, with the greatest effect in patients after metastasectomy, but mature overall survival data are not yet available. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, it must be noted that, at present, it has not been possible to achieve magnificent success in adjuvant therapy of RCC in patients at high risk of relapse after surgical treatment. There remains hope for adjuvant pembrolizumab, which has been used for high-risk population including patients with removed metastases who may benefit more from therapy.

Multicenter phase 2 study of intrapleural nivolumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer and pleural effusion.

About 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) developed pleural effusions at some time during the course of their disease. Preliminary results from our Phase 2 multicentre clinical trial (Cohort 1) demonstrated the safety of intrapleural nivolumab in cancer patients. In Cohort 2 we assessed the preliminary efficacy and toxicity of intrapleural instillation of the nivolumab in patients with metastatic NSCLC and large pleural effusion requiring evacuation. Thoracentesis followed by nivolumab (40 mg, single intrapleural instillation) was performed. The primary endpoint was 3-month recurrence-free survival. Simon's two-stage design was used, with 13 patients planned for stage 1. If 11 or more patients did not have a pleural effusion after 3 months, an additional 35 patients were planned to be accrued for a total of 48. A total of 13 patients were enrolled. This study did not meet its primary endpoint and was terminated. Eight patients (61.5%) had a recurrence of pleural effusion at 3 months. The median time to recurrence was 1.84 months (95% CI 1.19-2.49). No adverse events were identified. We concluded that a single intrapleural instillation of the nivolumab at 40 mg was ineffective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic NSCLC and pleural effusion.

A phase 1b study of the allosteric extracellular FGFR2 inhibitor alofanib in patients with pretreated advanced gastric cancer.

Alofanib is a small-molecule allosteric extracellular FGFR2 inhibitor. We report safety and preliminary efficacy from the first-in-human phase 1b study of alofanib in heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer. The standard dose-escalation design 3+3 aimed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Alofanib was administered daily intravenously 5 days on, 2 days off. There were five dose levels (50-350 mg/m2). All patients received alofanib until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. 21 patients were enrolled. Patients were predominantly male (71%), 67% had 2 and more metastatic sites, including liver metastases (43%), 19% had ECOG PS 2, and were heavily pretreated (86% had previous 2 and more treatment lines). During dose escalation, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and MTD was not defined. 15 (71.4%) patients had at least one adverse event associated with the treatment (TRAE). Grade 3 or higher TRAEs were observed in 6 patients (28.6%). The most common TRAEs included reactions immediately after administration, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, arthralgia, and headache. The median progression-free survival and overall survival was 3.63 (95% CI 1.58-5.68) and 7.0 (95% CI 3.82-10.18) months, respectively. The 6- and 12-month overall survival rates were 57.1% and 33.3%. Disease control rate was 68% with one durable partial response. The MTD has not been reached and dose of 350 mg/m2, 5 days on, 2 days off has been declared as RP2D. Alofanib showed acceptable tolerability and preliminary signs of clinical activity in the late-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04071184).

Patterns of Care and Barriers to Utilization of Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Russia.

BACKGROUND: Definitive concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) is offered to only 3% of Russian patients with stage III NSCLC. To determine the patterns of care and barriers to cCRT utilization in Russia, we conducted a survey of practicing radiation oncologists (ROs). METHODS: Electronic IRB-approved survey containing 15 questions was distributed to Russian ROs. Fisher's exact test or Cochran-Armitage test of trend was used to assess the associations between clinical experience, practice type, and patterns of care. RESULTS: We analyzed 58 questionnaires completed by ROs-16 respondents from tertiary referral hospitals, and 42 from community or private centers. A total of 88% of respondents formulate treatment recommendations in multi-disciplinary tumor boards. For unresectable stage III NSCLC, the most common recommendation is sequential CRT (50%), followed by concurrent CRT (40%), with an observed higher utilization of cCRT in tertiary centers (9/16, 56% vs 14/42, 33%). Of the respondents, 31% do not offer cCRT to their pts. Among reasons for avoiding cCRT are (1) poor performance of pts (76%); (2) high toxicity of therapy (55%); (3) lack of consensus among tumor board members (33%); and (4) preference for sequential CRT (31%). Only 3% do not irradiate elective LNs. Eighty-six percent of respondents counsel their NSCLC pts regarding smoking cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Despite level 1 evidence, cCRT is rarely used in Russia for pts with locally advanced NSCLC, and preference for sequential therapy and concerns over high toxicity are the most common barriers. Education of Russian ROs may increase cCRT utilization, leading to improved survival, notably in the era of maintenance immunotherapy.

Cholangiocarcinoma: An Emerging Target for Molecular Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Cholangiocarcinoma has been traditionally considered a tumor with poor prognosis. Until now, surgical treatment has been the only more or less effective approach. SUMMARY: Over 10 years, chemotherapy with a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin remains the standard first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma, which leads to a median overall survival of 11.7 months. Several inhibitors of HER (ERBB), HGF/c-MET, Hedgehog, KRAS-BRAF-MEK-ERK, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathways did not show their superiority to standard chemotherapy. The rise of hope is associated with the emergence of novel fibroblast growth factor receptors and isocitrate dehydrogenase inhibitors as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Safety and preliminary efficacy of the Gam-COVID-Vac vaccine and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Russian patients with genitourinary malignancies.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there is no clinical data pertaining to COVID-19 outcomes and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in Russian patients with genitourinary (GU) malignancies. Aim of our analysis was to describe the characteristics of the COVID-19 infection course as well as preliminary safety and efficacy of Gam-COVID-Vac vaccine in patients with active GU malignancies. METHODS: Patients were retrospectively identified at nine cancer centers in different regions. Patients were included if COVID-19 was diagnosed by a polymerase chain reaction. Data from additional patients with GU cancers who had no positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test before vaccination and who received two doses of Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) between 11 February and 31 August 2021 were collected for safety assessment. Anonymized data were collected through an online registry covering demographics, treatments, and outcomes. RESULTS: The Gam-COVID-Vac vaccine was well tolerated; no grade 3-5 toxicities were reported in 112 vaccinated metastatic GU cancer patients. The most common grade 1 adverse events (81%) were injection site reactions (76%), flu-like illness (68%), and asthenia (49%). Five patients experienced grade 2 chills (4.5%) and 3 patients had grade 2 fever (2.7%). With median follow-up of 6.2 months, two COVID-19 cases were confirmed by RT-PCR test in the vaccine group (of 112 participants; 1.8%). Eighty-eight patients with COVID-19 disease were included in the analysis. The average age as of the study enrollment was 66 (range 39-81) and the majority of patients were male with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Thirty-six patients (41%) had evidence of metastatic disease, of these 22 patients were receiving systemic therapy. More than half of patients required hospitalization. Fifty-four patients (61%) experienced complications. Sixteen patients who developed COVID-19 pneumonia required mechanical ventilator support. Sixteen patients (18%) died in a median of 23.5 days after the date of COVID-19 diagnosis was established. The 3-month survival rate was 82%. Clinical and/or radiographic progression of cancer during COVID-19 infection or the subsequent 3 months was observed in 10 patients (11.4%). CONCLUSION: Patients with GU malignancies are at increased risk of mortality from COVID-19 infection when compared to the general population. Vaccination could be safe in GU cancer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: retrospectively registered.

Immunochemical expression of fibroblast growth factor and its receptors in primary tumor cells of renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: There is the evidence of the role of the fibroblast growth factor and its receptors (FGF/FGFR) signaling pathway in tumorogenesis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We conducted a study aimed at evaluating of FGF2, FGFR1, and FGFR2 expression in primary tumor cells and assessing of these molecules expression levels effect on the characteristics of the tumor process and prognosis of patients with RCC. METHODS: Expression of FGF2, FGFR1, and FGFR2 was investigated in 65 primary RCC specimens by immuhistochemical staining using the appropriate antibodies. Expression levels were evaluated by the semi-quantitative method. A search for correlations of expression levels of investigated growth factors and receptors with RCC features and patients outcomes was performed. RESULTS: Cytoplasm and membrane expression of FGF2, FGFR1, and FGFR2 was found in the primary tumor cells of RCC patients. FGF2 staining was detected in 60.0% of cases (44.2 ± 5.4 HS). It was noted higher frequency and intensity of FGFR2 expression (66.2%; 46.6 ± 6.3 HS) comparing with FGFR1 (32.3%; 7.5 ± 2.2 HS). The correlation was revealed between the investigated markers overexpression and Fuhrman grade G3-4, as well as features of advanced RCC (paranephric fat tumor invasion, venous wall tumor invasion, adrenal and liver metastases). FGFR2 overexpression showed negative influence on cancer-specific survival in univariate analysis, however, lost its predictive value in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: Expression of FGF2 and its receptors was found on the surface and in the cytoplasm of RCC primary tumor cells and needs following investigations.

Testosterone for Managing Treatment-related Fatigue in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Study FARETES.

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is one of the most common adverse events of systemic therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of multicenter randomized phase 2 study was to determine the efficacy and safety of testosterone in patients with fatigue developed during targeted therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Male patients with metastatic clear-cell RCC, normal prostate-specific antigen level, low testosterone level, and no evidence of hypothyroidism receiving first-line sunitinib or pazopanib with fatigue were randomly assigned (1:1) to either testosterone undecanoate (1000 mg) and targeted therapy or targeted therapy alone. The primary endpoint was the mean change of fatigue from baseline to 28 days according to the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale. Secondary endpoints were safety, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index 19, testosterone serum concentrations, red blood cell count, and hemoglobin level. RESULTS: Sixty patients were assigned to receive testosterone and targeted therapy (N=30) or targeted therapy alone (N=30). As of the data cutoff on December 30, 2019, median follow-up was 18.2 months. The study achieved its primary endpoint based on the significant differences at day 28 favoring testosterone over targeted therapy alone regarding the decreased level of fatigue (difference between groups, 22.5 points; 95% confidence interval, 18.4-26.6; P=0.012). Significant changes in scores demonstrating the enhanced quality of life with testosterone compared with targeted therapy were also observed for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index 19 disease-related symptoms (P=0.01). There were nonsignificant differences in red blood cell count and hemoglobin level between the 2 groups (all P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Male patients with metastatic RCC and hypogonadism receiving testosterone had less fatigue and better symptom control during targeted therapy.

Overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belarus: a report from the RENSUR3 registry.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data describing outcomes of treatment among metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients are limited and heterogeneous. AIM: RENSUR3 registry study assessed real-world data on the use of therapies in mRCC and overall survival (OS) in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belarus. METHODS: Patients were included in the retrospective multicenter registry study. To be eligible, patients were required to have mRCC diagnosed from January 2015 to January 2016. Anonymized data were collected through an online registry. The outcomes of interest were patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and OS. RESULTS: 1094 mRCC patients were identified. Mean age was 62.3 (SD, 11.2) years. Four hundred and forty-four (41%) patients were 65 years and older. Primary tumor has not been removed in 503 (46%) patients. Subtype of RCC based on WHO classification (clear-cell or other) has been reported in 402 (37%) patients. In total, 595 (54.4%) patients received systemic therapy for metastatic disease. 58% of elderly patients (≥65) were not treated compared to 37% of younger patients. Cytokines and targeted therapy were used in 298 (50.1%) and 297 (49.9%) of 595 treated patients, respectively. Median OS was 11.9 months (95% CI 10.9-12.9). The 1- and 3-year OS rates were 49.6% and 19.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Half of patients received no systemic therapy or had only cytokines for mRCC in Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belarus, which doubtless negatively affected OS in this population. Novel therapies should be considered as life prolonging and a priority.

Management of Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer with Bladder Preservation in Russia: a Survey-Based Analysis of Current Practice and the Impact of an Educational Workshop on Clinical Expertise.

Trimodality bladder preservation (BP) is an accepted alternative to radical cystectomy for patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). The global utilization of BP is variable, and practice patterns have not been previously studied in Russia. We sought to elucidate the contemporary BP practice patterns in Russia and determine the impact of the BP workshop on attitudes of Russian radiation oncologists (ROs) towards BP. The workshop was focused on patient workup, selection for BP, chemotherapy choices, radiation therapy (RT) contouring and planning, patient counseling. A total of 77 pre- and 32 matched post-workshop IRB-approved surveys, based on the workshop content, were analyzed using descriptive statistics to determine baseline clinical experience and patterns of care. The impact was judged by changes in participants' responses. A total of 56% of respondents had experience with delivering bladder-directed RT, and 60% of those treated both operable and inoperable MIBC patients. Only 10% felt uncomfortable offering an operable patient BP modality. Prior to the workshop, almost half of respondents estimated universal poor bladder (44%) and erectile functions (47%) after BP. The workshop resulted in dramatic change in participants' attitudes towards long-term urinary (Stuart-Maxwell test, p < 0.01) and sexual (exact McNemar test, p < 0.01) side effects. Prior to the workshop, only 47% of respondents routinely discussed smoking cessation (SC) with their patients, whereas after workshop, 88% agreed that SC discussion is mandatory (exact McNemar test, p = 0.04). BP for MIBC is commonly used in Russia. Our workshop resulted in dramatically improved understanding of long-term BP toxicities and inspired Russian ROs to incorporate SC counseling into routine clinical management.

Harmonization of Molecular Testing for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Emphasis on PD-L1.

Comprehensive molecular testing plays a critical role in the choice of treatment for non-small lung cell cancer (NSCLC). The analysis of druggable alterations in EGFR, BRAF, MET, KRAS, ALK, ROS1, RET and NTRK1/2/3 genes is more or less standardized and can be achieved using a single diagnostic platform, e.g., next generation sequencing (NGS) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In contrast to above targets, PD-L1 testing requires the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC). There are multiple PD-L1 IHC assays, which utilize distinct antibodies and detection systems. These PD-L1 tests are tailored to distinct drugs, often rely on different thresholds and scoring guidelines, and are characterized by incomplete inter-laboratory and inter-observer reproducibility. Several studies evaluated the performance of PD-L1 RNA expression tests, as PCR-based RNA analysis is compatible with other NSCLC molecular testing platforms, can be performed in a semi-automated manner, and has a potential for proper standardization. These investigations revealed a correlation between PD-L1 protein and RNA expression; however, there were NSCLCs demonstrating decent amounts of PD-L1 transcript in the absence of PD-L1 IHC staining. Clinical studies are required to evaluate, which of the two PD-L1 testing approaches, i.e., RNA or protein expression measurement, has a better predictive value.

Agreement between PDL1 immunohistochemistry assays and polymerase chain reaction in non-small cell lung cancer: CLOVER comparison study.

The goal of the CLOVER study was to perform a pairwise comparison of four tests based on the same patient population with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): three validated PDL1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays (Ventana SP142, Ventana SP263, Dako 22C3) and one PCR test. Four hundred seventy-three NSCLC samples were obtained from a biobank and were stained using PDL1 IHC assays. Four trained pathologists independently evaluated the percentage of tumor cells (TC) and immune cells (IC) that stained positive at any intensity. PDL1 transcripts were quantified in 437 patients by a standard Taqman RT-PCR assay using SDHA as a reference gene. A concordance analysis was performed to assess (1) the correlation of TC and IC between different assays and (2) the predictive properties of one test for another. "High" RNA expression was detected in 187 of 437 (43%) patients. The percentage of PDL1-positive cells (≥1%) was higher among the IC than the TC in all IHC three assays. The Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) for TC were 0.71, 0.87, and 0.75 between 22C3/SP142, 22C3/SP263, and SP263/SP142, respectively. The PCC for IC were 0.45, 0.61, and 0.68 for the same pairs. A low correlation was observed between the PCR test and each of the three IHC assays; however, if a patient tested low/negative by PCR, then they were likely to test negative by any single IHC test with a high probability (92-99%). Among patients who tested positive by PCR, only 9-45% tested positive by IHC assays. There was excellent positive and negative agreement (>91%) between 22C3 and SP263 staining using the recommended individual cutoffs for first-line treatment. PCR RNA expression analysis is not equivalent to IHC. However, this method may have some potential for the identification of PDL1-negative tumors. 22C3 could be considered as a substitute for SP263 in first-line treatment.

Expression of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases on Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma and Healthy Donors.

BACKGROUND: Very little is known about receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) expression on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in humans including renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate expression levels of major RTKs on PBMC and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) isolated from RCC patients. The secondary aim was to compare levels of RTK expression in RCC patients before surgery and on the 180th day after surgery (lymphocyte lifetime) and to compare them with the expression in healthy donors. In addition, we compared RTK and PD-L1 expression in TIL. METHODS: Tumor and blood samples were obtained from 20 patients with primary RCC immediately after surgical resection. Blood samples were collected from 20 healthy donors. Tumors were harvested into RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco) and processed within 4 h. TIL isolation was performed using a modified protocol [Baldan et al. Br J Cancer. 2015;112:1510-18]. Expression of RTKs was evaluated with NovoExpress Software. Twenty tumors from the same patients were stained with PD-L1 IHC assay (clone SP142; Ventana). RESULTS: PBMC and TIL express RTKs in humans. The RTK expression level was significantly lower on peripheral blood cells in patients with RCC (mean 41%, range 27.1-62.6%) as compared with healthy donor PBMC (mean 77.1%, range 72.1-80.1%, all p < 0.05). Furthermore, RTK expression was significantly downregulated on intratumoral cells (mean 40%, range 23.2-52.3%) in comparison with healthy donor PBMC. There was no significant recovery of RTK expression on the 180th day except for VEGFR2. Five of 20 (25%) patients were PD-L1 positive. PD-L1 expression on TIL was strongly associated with downregulated expression of PDGFRα (p = 0.017) and PDGFRß (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: PBMC and TIL had similar low RTK expression levels in RCC patients. PBMC of healthy humans had a significantly higher expression of RTK. PD-L1 and PDGFRα-ß expression could correlate. Comprehensive basic and clinical studies will be needed to define a biological role of RTKs on different lymphocyte subsets and correlations between clinical outcomes and expression levels.

Nivolumab in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma and chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) interferes with activation of innate and adaptive immune responses. Theoretically, the efficacy and toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients infected with HCV may differ. Nevertheless, HCV was an exclusion criterion in most checkpoint inhibitor trials. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients with or without chronic HCV infection. METHODS: In a matched cohort study, data were collected from 174 patients, retrospectively. All patients had clear-cell mRCC, chronic HCV infection (case study group), no evidence of other malignancy or cirrhosis, and had received nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Quantitation of HCV RNA in plasma samples was performed before and during treatment with nivolumab with the automated HCV test (Hoffmann-La Roche, Switzerland). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and rate of grade 3-4 adverse events in study and control cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 44 matched patients were included. Groups were well balanced. HCV-infected patients had significantly longer OS and PFS. Median OS was 27.5 (95% CI 25.3-29.7) and 21.7 (20.3-23.1) in study and control groups, respectively (P = 0.005). Median PFS was 7.5 (5.7-9.3) and 4.9 (4-5.8) (P = 0.013). Despite no differences in ORR between groups (27% vs. 23%, P = 0.7), patients with HCV had significantly more durable responses (P = 0.01). Nivolumab was well tolerated in all HCV-positive patients. No unexpected toxicity was observed. Assessment of viral load during nivolumab therapy was available in 14 of 22 (64%) patients with HCV. Nivolumab did not significantly impact HCV concentration (mean change 210 IU/ml, P = 0.82) in the absence of antiviral therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety profiles observed in this study support the administration of nivolumab in mRCC patients infected with HCV and warrant further investigation.

Expression of growth factors and their receptors in the primary renal cell carcinoma: new data and review.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to investigate expression levels and the prognostic value of multiple growth factors and their receptors in the primary tumor cells of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)A, fibroblast growth factor (FGF)2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)1, VEGFR2, FGFR1, FGFR2, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)α, and PDGFRß was investigated in 65 primary RCC specimens by immuhistochemical staining using the appropriate antibodies. Expression levels were evaluated by the semi-quantitative method. A search for correlations of expression levels of investigated growth factors and receptors with RCC features and patients outcomes was performed. RESULTS: Expression of all growth factors and their receptors was detected both on the surface and in the cytoplasm of the primary tumor cells in RCC patients. The expression of all analyzed factors was interconnected. FGFR2 expression correlated with the largest number of other growth factors and receptors. A strong correlation was revealed between high expression of the studied markers, high Fuhrman grade, and advanced RCC stages. In a univariate analysis overexpression of VEGFR2 (p <0.0001) and FGFR2 (p = 0.014) had negative influence on cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of growth factors and tyrosine kinase receptors in the primary tumor cells is strongly interconnected and associated with unfavorable features of RCC.

Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Russia: a Survey-Based Analysis of Current Practice and the Impact of an Educational Workshop on Clinical Expertise.

Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but globally, it is underutilized. In Russia, practice patterns with regard to liver-directed radiation are unknown. Under the auspices of Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), our team conducted an IRB-approved contouring workshop for Russian radiation oncologists. Pre- and post-workshop surveys were analyzed to determine baseline clinical experience and patterns of care for liver-directed RT among Russian providers. The effect of the contouring workshop on participants' knowledge was tested using mixed effects model. Forty pre-workshop and 24 post-workshop questionnaires were analyzable with a 100% response rate. Sixty percent of respondents had never evaluated a patient with HCC and only 8% (3 out of 40) reported treating an HCC patient with liver-directed RT. Nonetheless, 73% of respondents were comfortable offering liver-directed RT prior to the workshop. After the workshop, 85% of respondents felt comfortable treating a patient with HCC with liver-directed RT and 50% were comfortable recommending stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Measures of knowledge pertaining to evaluation of HCC patients and selection for appropriate liver-directed therapies were dramatically improved after the workshop. Liver-directed RT is not commonly used in Russia in the management of patients with HCC, and few centers are equipped for motion management. Our contouring workshop resulted in dramatically improved understanding of the evaluation and management of HCC patients. We recommend starting with a more protracted fractionated RT and building experience through attendance of additional educational activities, participation in multidisciplinary liver tumor boards, and prospective analysis of treatment toxicity and outcomes.