Management of patients hospitalized for diabetic foot infection: results of the French OPIDIA study.

AIM: This study was an analysis of how diabetic patients with infected foot wounds are managed in hospital by departments specializing in diabetic foot pathology, including an evaluation of the outcome 1 year after discharge. METHODS: This was a prospective study of a cohort of patients hospitalized for diabetic foot infection at 38 hospital centres in France and followed-up for 1 year after discharge. RESULTS: Altogether, 291 patients were included (73% male; 85% type 2 diabetes; mean age: 64.3±11.7 years). Most of the wounds were located on the toes and forefoot, and infection was most often graded as moderate; nevertheless, in about 50% of patients, osteomyelitis was suspected. Also, 87% of patients had peripheral neuropathy and 50-62% had peripheral artery disease. Gram-positive cocci, and Staphylococcus aureus in particular, were by far the most frequently isolated microorganisms. During hospitalization, lower-limb amputation was performed in 35% of patients; in 52%, the wound healed or had a favourable outcome. A year after discharge, 150 non-amputated patients were examined: at this time, 19% had to undergo amputation, whereas 79% had healed their wounds with no relapse. Risk factors for amputation were location (toes), severity of the wound and presence of osteomyelitis. Peripheral artery disease was associated with a poor prognosis, yet was very often neglected. CONCLUSION: In spite of being managed at specialized centres that were, in general, following the agreed-upon published guidelines, the prognosis for diabetic foot infection remains poor, with a high rate (48%) of lower-limb amputation.

A proof-of-concept study of the effectiveness of a removable device for offloading in patients with neuropathic ulceration of the foot: the Ransart boot.

AIM: To undertake a proof-of-concept study to determine whether a removable offloading device (the Ransart boot) for the management of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) was as effective as reports of non-removable devices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This observational study used the Ransart boot for patients with DFU, in seven specialist centres. If a patient had two or more ulcers, one was selected as the index ulcer. Ulcers were classified by the University of Texas (UT) system. RESULTS: There were 135 patients (mean age 60.3 +/- 11.4 years); 96 (71.1%) male. Median ulcer duration at presentation was 90 [interquartile range (IQR) 30-1825] days. Seven were lost to follow-up, seven developed other major illnesses and four died; outcomes were documented in the remaining 117. Eighty-two (70.1% of 117) healed, after a median (IQR) 60 (43-99) days, while 22 (18.8%) ulcers were resolved by amputation (one major). The remaining 13 (11.1%) patients were judged non-compliant. There was a close correlation between ulcer classification at baseline and both time to healing (P < 0.001 chi(2)-test) and amputation (P < 0.001; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient). There was a positive correlation between ulcer duration at presentation and time to healing (P < 0.02), UT class (P < 0.01), glycated haemoglobin (P < 0.02) and amputation (P < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Time to healing and incidence of amputation were comparable with those previously reported for non-removable devices. Given that a removable device is much more acceptable to the patient, the effectiveness, cost and acceptability of the removable devices, such as the Ransart boot, need to be compared with a non-removable device in a randomized trial. Diabet. Med. 26, 778-782 (2009).