Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Bioeth ; 21(10): 30-32, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34554075
2.
Genet Med ; 16(11): 820-6, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24830328

ABSTRACT

The data-sharing policies of the National Institutes of Health aim to maximize public benefit derived from genetic studies by increasing research efficiency and use of a pooled data resource for future studies. Although broad access to data may lead to benefits for populations underrepresented in genetic studies, such as indigenous groups, tribes have ownership interest in their data. The Northwest-Alaska Pharmacogenetic Research Network, a partnership involving tribal organizations and universities conducting basic and translational pharmacogenetic research, convened a meeting to discuss the collection, management, and secondary use of research data, and of the processes surrounding access to data stored in federal repositories. This article reports the tribal perspectives that emerged from the dialogue and discusses the implications of tribal government sovereign status on research agreements and data-sharing negotiations. There is strong tribal support for efficient research processes that expedite the benefits from collaborative research, but there is also a need for data-sharing procedures that take into account tribal sovereignty and appropriate oversight of research--such as tribally based research review processes and review of draft manuscripts. We also note specific ways in which accountability could be encouraged by the National Institutes of Health as part of the research process.


Subject(s)
Community Networks/organization & administration , Information Dissemination/legislation & jurisprudence , Translational Research, Biomedical/legislation & jurisprudence , Community Networks/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Indians, North American , Information Dissemination/ethics , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , United States , Universities
4.
J Law Med Ethics ; 35(3): 396-411, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17714250

ABSTRACT

This article examines the intercultural context of issues related to genetic research on Native peoples. In particular, the article probes the disconnect between Western and indigenous concepts of property, ownership, and privacy, and examines the harms to Native peoples that may arise from unauthorized uses of blood and tissue samples or the information derived from such samples. The article concludes that existing legal and ethical frameworks are inadequate to address Native peoples' rights to their genetic resources and suggests an intercultural framework for accommodation based on theories of intergroup equality and fundamental human rights.


Subject(s)
Beneficence , Genetic Research/ethics , Genetic Research/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights , Indians, North American/genetics , Vulnerable Populations/ethnology , Attitude to Health/ethnology , Biotechnology/ethics , Biotechnology/legislation & jurisprudence , Genetic Privacy/ethics , Genetic Privacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Indians, North American/legislation & jurisprudence , Intellectual Property , Ownership/legislation & jurisprudence , Privacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Justice , United States , Vulnerable Populations/legislation & jurisprudence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...