ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acrylamide poisoning is often reported as chronic poisoning presenting with peripheral neuropathy or carcinogenic action due to long-term exposure to low concentrations. However, there have been few reports of acute poisoning due to oral ingestion of acrylamide, where the symptoms appear a few hours after ingestion. Here, we report a case of acute acrylamide poisoning where a high concentration was ingested in a short time, resulting in a fatal outcome due to the rapid course of events. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was an adolescent female who ingested 150 ml (148 g) of acrylamide with suicidal intent. A disorder of consciousness was observed when the emergency medical team arrived 36 min later. An hour later, tracheal intubation and intravenous access were performed at a hospital, and 2 h after that, she was transported to our hospital. After she arrived at the hospital, circulatory dynamics could not be maintained despite vasopressor and colloid osmotic infusion, and hemodialysis could not be introduced. Subsequently, cardiopulmonary arrest occurred, and the patient passed away 7 h after ingestion. In the present case, severe symptoms appeared shortly after acrylamide ingestion, unlike other reported cases. In previous report summarizing animal studies, there was a relationship among the symptoms of acute poisoning, the dose, and onset time. The data from this case were compared to those from previous reports, and we were able to predict the early appearance of severe symptoms based on this comparison. CONCLUSION: The severity of acute acrylamide poisoning by oral ingestion was primarily dependent on the amount and rate of ingestion.
ABSTRACT
Despite rapid advancements in medical technologies, the use of interventional radiology in a patient with hemodynamic instability or hollow viscus injury remains controversial. Here, we discuss important aspects regarding the use of interventional radiology for such patients. A 74-year-old Japanese male climber was injured following a 10 m fall. On admission, his systolic blood pressure was 40 mmHg. He had disturbance of consciousness and mild upper abdominal pain without peritoneal irritation. Focused assessment sonography for trauma indicated massive hemorrhage in the intra-abdominal cavity. Plain radiographs revealed hemopneumothorax with right-side rib fractures. Thoracostomy to the right thoracic cavity and massive transfusion were immediately performed. Consequently, a sheath catheter was inserted into the common femoral artery for interventional radiology. His systolic blood pressure increased to 80 mmHg owing to rapid transfusion. In the computed tomography scan room, based on computed tomography findings, we judged that it was possible to achieve hemostasis by interventional radiology. The time from hospital admission to entering the angiography suite was 38 min. Transcatheter arterial embolization for hemorrhage control was performed without complications. Following transcatheter arterial embolization, he was admitted to the intensive care unit. All injuries could be treated conservatively without surgery. His post-interventional course was uneventful, and he recovered completely after rehabilitation. Hemorrhage control using interventional radiology should be assessed as a first-line treatment, even in hemodynamically unstable patients having a hollow viscus injury with active bleeding, without obvious findings that indicate surgical repair.
