ABSTRACT
Infertility is the inability to conceive after one year of regular unprotected intercourse. There is a debate about the therapeutic effect of hysterosalpingography (HSG) and whether the selection of contrast materials makes a difference in the chance of subsequent conception. In this study, we aimed to compare the fertility-enhancing outcomes and adverse effects of oil and water-based contrasts in patients who underwent HSG. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus until September 2022. We included all primary randomized controlled trials evaluating the fertility-enhancing benefits of HSG in oil-based versus water-based contrast media in women of childbearing age with infertility. Eleven studies with 4,739 patients were selected. The pregnancy rate in the oil group was significantly higher than that in the water group [odds ratio (OR)=1.51 (1.23, 1.86), p<0.0001]. Our meta-analysis favored the oil group in abdominal pain and vaginal bleeding with the odd ratios of 0.73 (0.58, 0.91), (p=0.006) and 0.91 (0.46, 1.81), (p=0.79), respectively. Water-based contrast was associated with less intravasation [OR=2.09 (1.09-4.02), p=0.03]. There were no differences between the contrasts for miscarriage [OR=1.02 (0.71, 1.46), p=0.92], and ectopic pregnancy [OR=0.84 (0.27, 2.63), p=0.77]. HSG with oil-based contrast was related to a higher pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and intravasation rate. While HSG using a water-based contrast medium was associated with increased abdominal discomfort, vaginal bleeding, and the visual-analogue scale pain score.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To identify the preferred agent by comparing the therapeutic efficacy, degree of infarction, and side effects of polyvinyl alcohol particles (PVA) and tris-acryl gelatin embolization (TAGM) agents in uterine artery embolization. Materials and Methods: We included available articles comparing PVA with TAGM embolization agents in the management of fibroids. The primary outcomes included the decrease in uterine volume (%), decrease in dominant tumor volume (%), fibroid infarction rate, complete infarction fibroid, complications, pain score after 24 h, procedure time (minutes), duration of hospital stay, fluoroscopy time (minutes), and the change in symptom severity score. Results: Eight articles that met our inclusion criteria were included in this study. Our analysis yielded an overall superiority of PVA compared to TAGM regarding complete fibroid infarction rate at the first 24 h. However, TAGM was better than PVA concerning <90% infarction rate outcome. While both embolization techniques showed similar effects regarding the change in symptom severity score, the percentage of decrease in uterine volume, percentage of decrease of dominant tumor volume, 90-99% infarction rate, complete infarction rate when assessed after the first 24 h, pain score after the first 24 h, procedure time, fluoroscopy time, minor, and major complications. Conclusion: Both PVA and TAGM embolization agents are effective and safe modalities in treating patients with fibroids, with no significant variation of both agents in most outcomes.
