Optimal left ventricular diameter measurement in subjects with sigmoid septum: comparison with three-dimensional left ventricular volume.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate measurement of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter for subjects with the sigmoid septum (SS) by measuring the LV end-diastolic diameter at the base and mid-ventricle and by examining the relationship between these measurements and the three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic LV end-diastolic volume. METHODS: In 91 patients who underwent echocardiography for screening cardiovascular abnormalities, the aorto-septal angle (ASA) was measured as an index of the sigmoid septum. LV end-diastolic diameter was measured at the base and mid-ventricular level (DDbase and DDmid, respectively), and their average value was calculated (DDavg). By using 3D echocardiography, LV end-diastolic volume (EDV3D) was measured. RESULTS: Among 91 patients, 48 patients had narrow ASA (< 120 degrees) and were divided into the sigmoid septum (SS) group, and the remaining 43 patients were divided into the non-SS group. In the SS group, all DDbase, DDmid, and DDavg were significantly correlated with EDV3D (r = 0.59, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively), and the correlation coefficient between DDbase and EDV3D was significantly lower than that between DDmid and EDV3D (p < 0.01). On the other hand, in the non-SS group, all DDbase, DDmid, and DDavg were significantly correlated with EDV3D (r = 0.77, 0.85, and 0.84, respectively), and the correlation coefficient between DDbase and EDV3D was statistically comparable to that between DDmid and EDV3D (p = 0.12). ASA was significantly correlated with the difference of DDmid minus DDbase (r = - 0.71, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SS, DDmid and DDavg were well reflected the 3D echocardiographic LV end-diastolic volume.

Left ventricular global longitudinal strain calculated from manually traced endocardial border lengths utilizing the images for routine ejection fraction measurement by biplane method of disks.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to test whether the fractional change in the endocardial border length between end-diastole and end-systole as manually traced in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement using the biplane method of disks (MOD) was consistent with the global longitudinal strain derived from speckle-tracking echocardiography. METHODS: For 105 patients who underwent echocardiography, two- and four-chamber images with manually traced endocardial lines for LVEF measurement by MOD were stored. LV endocardial lengths at end-diastole and at end-systole were measured on both images to calculate the fractional length changes, which were averaged (GLSMOD). Speckle-tracking analysis was performed to measure global longitudinal strains in the apical two- and four-chamber and long-axis images, and the three values were averaged (GLSSTE) according to the ASE and EACVI guidelines. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between GLSMOD and GLSSTE. GLSMOD correlated well with GLSSTE (r = 0.81, p < 0.001), and there was no fixed bias in the Bland-Altman analysis. The intraclass correlations for the intra- and inter-observer comparisons for GLSSTE were excellent, and those for GLSMOD were adequate. CONCLUSION: The fractional LV endocardial border length change, GLSMOD, showed sufficient agreement with GLSSTE to justify its use as a substitute for the STE-derived global longitudinal strain.

Right ventricular basal inflow and outflow tract diameters overestimate right ventricular size in subjects with sigmoid-shaped interventricular septum: a study using three-dimensional echocardiography.

Sigmoid-shaped ventricular septum (SS), a frequently encountered minor abnormality in echocardiographic examinations of the elderly, may have some influence on RV shape. We aimed to determine the influence of SS on the accuracy of the 6 RV linear diameter measurements in the light of three-dimensional echocardiographic (3DE) RV volume. The aorto-septal angle (ASA) was measured in the parasternal long-axis view using two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) as an index of SS in 70 patients without major cardiac abnormalities who were subdivided into 35 with SS (ASA ≤ 120°) and 35 without SS (NSS). We measured RV end-diastolic volume (RVEDV) using 3DE; in addition, using 2DE, we measured basal RV diameter, mid-cavity diameter, longitudinal diameter and end-diastolic area in the apical four-chamber view; proximal RV outflow tract (RVOT) diameter in the parasternal long-axis view; and proximal and distal RVOT diameters in the parasternal short-axis view. RVEDV did not differ between the SS and NSS groups. The SS group had greater basal RV diameter and proximal and distal RVOT diameters than the NSS group. RV mid-cavity diameter, longitudinal diameter, and end-diastolic area did not differ between the groups. Among the 2DE parameters of RV size, RV end-diastolic area was most strongly correlated with RVEDV (r = 0.67), followed by RV mid-cavity diameter (r = 0.58). When SS is present, the echocardiographic basal RV diameter and RVOT diameters overestimate RV size, and the measurement of RV end-diastolic area and mid-cavity diameter more correctly reflect 3D RV volume.