Drug-dependent analgesic efficacy in interscalene block for postoperative pain after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a comparison between ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.

Background: Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) provides high analgesic efficacy for postoperative pain. However, different drug efficacies remain unclear. This retrospective study compared the efficacy of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine in a single-dose ISB for pain control after ARCR. Methods: This study included 173 patients who underwent ARCR; they were divided into the ISBR group (n = 61) that received ISB with 20 mL 0.375% ropivacaine and 3.3 mg dexamethasone, and the ISBL group (n = 112) that received ISB with 20 mL 0.25% levobupivacaine and 3.3 mg dexamethasone. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were evaluated at 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours, postoperatively. Rebound pain was defined as a difference of ≥ 5 points between the highest and lowest VAS pain scores. Results: The mean VAS pain scores at 1 hour were not significantly different between the groups. ISBL administration resulted in significantly lower VAS pain scores at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours than ISBR administration. Rebound pain rates in the ISBR and ISBL groups were 41.0% and 17.9%, respectively. Rebound pain was more frequent in the ISBR than in the ISBL group. Conclusion: ISB with levobupivacaine and dexamethasone can provide more effective postoperative pain control after ARCR than ropivacaine and dexamethasone.

Randomized active-controlled study of a single preoperative administration of duloxetine to treat postoperative pain and numbness after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

BACKGROUND: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, active controlled trial assessed whether a single preoperative administration of 40 mg of duloxetine could decrease postoperative pain and numbness after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery (PLIF). METHODS: Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II undergoing PLIF were included. At 2 hours before inducing anesthesia, patients were administered 40 mg duloxetine or 4 mg diazepam (control drug). Postoperative pain and other symptoms were evaluated on the basis of a visual analog scale, amount of fentanyl used, fentanyl dose request times, rate of use of adjunctive analgesics (diclofenac sodium or pentazocine), and lower limb numbness score (0-3) during the first 2 postoperative days. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were randomly assigned to the duloxetine and diazepam groups (n = 23 each); 6 were lost to follow-up, and analysis was performed on data from 22 patients in the duloxetine group and 18 in the diazepam group. No significant differences were detected in the patient background, postoperative visual analog scale score at rest in the lumbar region and lower limbs, fentanyl use, rate of analgesic adjuvant use, or incidence of side effects. The numbness score in the lower limbs, however, was significantly lower in the duloxetine group. CONCLUSION: A single preoperative 40-mg dose of duloxetine did not improve postoperative pain after PLIF, but did improve lower limb numbness. Duloxetine may suppress neuropathic pain-like symptoms after PLIF surgery.

A randomized placebo-controlled study of preoperative pregabalin for postoperative analgesia in patients with spinal surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether single preoperative administration of 2 different doses of pregabalin (75 and 150 mg) could decrease postoperative pain intensity and opioid consumption following posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, active placebo-controlled, double-blinded study. SETTING: Postoperative recovery area and patients' room. PATIENTS: Ninety-seven adult, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 patients. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive diazepam 5 mg as an active placebo (D5), pregabalin 75 mg (P75), or pregabalin 150 mg (P150). The study drug was orally administered 2 hours prior to surgery and a standard anesthetic technique was used. Postoperative pain was managed using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine. MEASUREMENT: The visual analog scale at rest was used to measure pain intensity immediately after extubation at the postanesthesia care unit, and then 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery. Morphine consumption and adverse effects were assessed until 48 hours after surgery. MAIN RESULTS: The visual analog scale score at rest was lower in the P150 group than in the D5 group until 2 hours after surgery. Morphine consumption was lower in the P150 group than in the D5 from 0 to 12 hours after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Single preoperative administration of 150 mg of pregabalin 2 hours prior to surgery reduced postoperative pain intensity and morphine consumption compared with 5 mg diazepam in patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Cronkhite-Canada syndrome with colon cancer, portal thrombosis, high titer of antinuclear antibodies, and membranous glomerulonephritis.

A 64-year-old man, who came to us with diarrhea, presented with ectodermal changes such as hyperpigmentation, alopecia, and onychatrophy, and was affected by polyposis in the colorectum and stomach. The polyps were histologically consistent with those in Cronkhite-Canada syndrome (CCS). Interestingly, the patient also had colon cancer, as well as portal thrombosis and a high concentration of antinuclear antibody. Treatment with prednisolone ameliorated the symptoms and the gastrointestinal polyposis, while the cancer was successfully treated with a hemicolectomy. Six months after the surgery, the patient developed nephropathy, with nephrotic-range proteinuria, without recurrence of the cancer. The biopsied renal specimen showed membranous glomerulonephritis. This is a rare case of CCS associated with various complications such as colon cancer, portal vein thrombosis, a high titer of antinuclear antibodies, and membranous glomerulonephritis. Although the pathogenesis of CCS is essentially unknown, these complications might have been indicative of an underlying immunological abnormality.