The safety of macrolides during lactation.

BACKGROUND: Infantile exposure to macrolides has been associated with hypertrophic pyloric stenosis causing projectile vomiting, dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities, and in rare cases death possibly via macrolide interaction with gastric motilin receptors. Large population-based cohorts have suggested that exposure to macrolides via breastmilk may be associated with pyloric stenosis. METHODS: In this prospective, controlled observational study designed to assess the safety of macrolides during lactation, we followed infants whose mothers contacted our Drug Consultation Center at the Assaf Harofeh Medical Center (Zerrifin, Israel) inquiring about safety of macrolides during lactation and compared them to a cohort of infants exposed to amoxicillin during breastfeeding. RESULTS: Fifty-five infants exposed to macrolide antibiotics were compared to a control cohort of 36 infants exposed to amoxicillin via lactation. The infants in the macrolide group were all exposed to erythromycin and the newer macrolides: azithromycin, clarithromycin, and roxithromycin. The rate of adverse reactions the infant experienced while being exposed to both antibiotics was comparable. Seven (12.7%) infants in the macrolide group experienced adverse reactions versus three infants (8.3%) in the amoxicillin group (odds ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval, 0.38-6.65, p = 0.73). The adverse reactions in the infants exposed to macrolides were rash, diarrhea, loss of appetite, and somnolence, whereas the infants exposed to amoxicillin experienced rashes and somnolence. Factors such as gestational age, age and weight at exposure, maternal age, or type of macrolide were not associated with the infant's adverse reaction in multivariate regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Rates and types of minor adverse reactions in breastfed infants exposed to a macrolide or amoxicillin in breastmilk were comparable. Macrolide exposure during breastfeeding was not associated with pyloric stenosis, although larger prospective studies are required to confirm our observation.

Ovulation induction and risk of endometrial cancer: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether women with endometrial carcinoma are more likely to have been exposed to fertility drugs, in particular clomiphene, than healthy population controls. STUDY DESIGN: A nationwide case-control, pilot study. About 128 living women 35-64 years old, with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma that was first diagnosed and reported to The Israel Cancer Registry between 1 January 1989 and 31 December 1992 were enrolled. The controls were 255 women from the same dialing areas selected by random digit dialing. A variety of demographic and clinical parameters were compared between cases and controls. A multivariate logistic model, controlling for age, was used to assess the independent effects of factors found to be significantly associated with endometrial cancer on univariate analysis. RESULTS: About 7 women with endometrial carcinoma (5.5%) and 10 healthy controls (3.9%) reported that they had used any fertility drug (crude odds ratio (OR) 1.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-4.2). Use of fertility drugs did not meet the criteria for entry into the logistic model. The following parameters were found to be independently associated with endometrial cancer controlling for age, European-American background OR=2.2, (95% CI 1.3-3.7, P=0.004); nulliparity OR=2.7 (95% CI 1.1-6.5, P=0.03); history of infertility OR=1.8 (95% CI 1.0-3.3, P=0.05); BMI> or =27 OR=2.3 (95% CI 1.4-3.9, P=0.001). The use of oral contraceptives and IUD were found to be protective, OR=0.29 and 0.37, respectively, (95% CI 0.14-0.61, P=0.001 and 0.19-0.70, P=0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that the use of ovulation induction agents, including clomiphene citrate, are associated with a higher risk of endometrial carcinoma. The association between infertility drugs and endometrial carcinoma should be examined in other, larger studies.