ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Lidocaine was the commonly used local anesthetic. The present study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics of intravenous and topical lidocaine in patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients who were scheduled for thoracoscopic pulmonary resection were screened and randomly assigned to the intravenous lidocaine group and topical lidocaine group. After induction, the patient in the intravenous group was given an intravenous bolus of 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine, while the patient in the topical group was given 3.0 mg/kg lidocaine via the "spray-as-you-go" method. Arterial blood was sampled at preset intervals, and plasma concentrations of lidocaine and its metabolites [monoethylglycinexylidide (MEGX) and glycinexylidide (GX)] were measured by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Following intravenous administration, plasma lidocaine concentration reached its peak with a time to reach Cmax (Tmax) of 0.05 h and then decreased in a biphasic manner with a very short half-life time (T1/2) of 1.85 h. After topical administration, lidocaine was well absorbed, with Tmax of 0.21 h and bioavailability of 71.02%. The mean Tmax, Cmax, and area under the curve from the time (AUC0-t) of MEGX and GX were higher in the topical group than in the intravenous group. There were no obvious differences in the Cmax, T1/2, clearance, or apparent volume of distribution of lidocaine between the two groups. No obvious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Topical administration of 3 mg/kg lidocaine via the "spray-as-you-go" method is an effective and safe technology for patients undergoing thoracoscopic pulmonary resection.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Lidocaine , Humans , Injections, IntravenousABSTRACT
AIMS: To investigate whether oral immunization with Aeromonas hydrophila ghosts (AHG) vaccine can elicit mucosal and systemic immune responses of Carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) compared to conventional formalin-killed bacteria (FKC). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fish were fed diets coated with AHG, FKC or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) alone, after immunization, more antigen-specific antibody was significantly detected in serum and intestinal mucus in AHG group than FKC group and PBS group. In addition, after challenged with the parent strain J-1, the survival of bacterial ghost-vaccinated fish was higher than PBS group and FKC group, the relative per cent survival (RPS) being 76.8%, 58.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Oral immunization with A. hydrophila ghosts can elicit systemic and mucosal adaptive immune responses and has higher potential to induce protective adaptive immunity than normal vaccine. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Oral immunization with bacterial ghosts is a promising new solution with potential application to prevent diseases in fish.
