Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
J Agric Saf Health ; 13(4): 367-74, 2007 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18075013

ABSTRACT

A noise exposure survey was conducted at an agricultural facility to evaluate noise exposures during potato processing and during the manufacture of alfalfa pellets. Of the 19 employees monitored, five reached or exceeded the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recommended exposure limit for occupational noise. Four of these employees were from the potato processing area, and one was from the alfalfa pellet-mill operation. Two of the five (bagger and pellet-mill operator) also exceeded the Occupational Safety and Health Administration action level. The facility has a well-managed hearing conservation program for employees in the potato processing area, but not in the alfalfa manufacturing area.


Subject(s)
Agricultural Workers' Diseases/prevention & control , Animal Feed , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/prevention & control , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Agricultural Workers' Diseases/etiology , Animals , Ear Protective Devices , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/etiology , Humans , Medicago sativa , Occupational Exposure , Solanum tuberosum
7.
Occup Med ; 10(4): 843-56, 1995.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8903753

ABSTRACT

Since the NIH received a request to investigate the high degree of hearing loss in a fire department in 1980, hearing loss among firefighters has become an area of increased investigation. The author identifies the sources of occupational noise in firefighting, looks at audiometric testing and recent research in firefighting noise, and presents guidelines for implementing hearing conservation programs.


Subject(s)
Fires , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced , Occupational Diseases , Audiometry , Ear Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/diagnosis , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/prevention & control , Humans , Occupational Diseases/diagnosis , Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health
9.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J ; 52(9): 372-8, 1991 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1781442

ABSTRACT

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) was requested to conduct a health hazard evaluation (HHE) at a large metropolitan fire department. The request concerned the hearing levels and noise exposures of fire fighters who were assigned to two fire stations serving the international airport. There was concern that these fire fighters were at a greater risk of accruing hearing loss than fire fighters located at other fire stations because of the addition of aircraft noise to their occupational noise exposures. The city also requested that NIOSH investigate other fire stations, not influenced by the airport, for noise exposures and hearing ability among a larger population of the fire fighters. NIOSH investigators conducted noise surveys at five fire stations and examined the hearing ability of 197 fire fighters. The noise surveys consisted of personal noise dosimetry on fire fighters assigned to the fire station for the entire 24-hr tour of duty over 2 consecutive days at each of the five stations. A NIOSH investigator accompanied the fire fighters on their vehicle to log response times and activities. The audiometric examinations were pure-tone, air conduction tests administered according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA's) hearing conservation amendment. The noise dosimetry results revealed time-weighted averages (TWAs) that ranged from 60 to 82 dBA. However, the levels encountered during Code 3 responses (warning lights, sirens, and air horns) reached 109 dBA for a 1-min time period. The audiometric results showed that the average fire fighter exhibited a characteristic noise-induced permanent threshold shift.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Aircraft , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/etiology , Noise, Occupational/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure , Adult , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Fires , Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced/diagnosis , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors
10.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 63(6): 1912-8, 1978 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-98550

ABSTRACT

Sixty-two of 133 subjects reported visual-field displacements when they were exposed to intense (125 dB SPL) repetitive audiofrequency transients. This phenomenon was investigated in three experiments. Frequency (100-5000 Hz) was varied in experiment I; repetition rate (0.5/s--6.0/s) was varied in experiment II; acoustical transient onset/offset time (0.2--25 ms) was examined in experiment III. The results of these three experiments indicated that the largest proportion of displacement reports and the largest perceived motion magnitudes followed stimulation in the 500- to 1000-Hz frequency range at repetition rates of about 1/s. Response differences as a function of onset/offset time were erratic. The pattern of results obtained in this study, in conjunction with the results of previous investigations of acoustical vestibular stimulation, suggests that the visual-field displacments resulted from stimulation of the receptors of the vestibular system. These experiments may account for discrepancies in reports of infrasound-evoked eye movements. Finally, it is suggested that intense sound exposure may damage the vestibular receptors with or without concomitant damage to the auditory portion of the membranous labyrinth.


Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation , Visual Fields , Animals , Eye Movements , Guinea Pigs , Haplorhini , Humans , Species Specificity , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiology , Visual Perception
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...