ABSTRACT
Dental implant insertion requires the preparation of the implant bed via surgical drilling. During this stage, irrigation is essential to avoid thermal damage to the surrounding bone. Surgical guides enhance the accuracy of the implant site preparation, but they mask the drilling site, hampering coolant delivery. A variety of designs are aimed at improving the coolant access to the target site. Using standard dental implant simulation software, this paper presents an in-house design and 3D printing workflow for building surgical guides that incorporate a coolant channel directed toward the entry point of the burr. The proposed design was evaluated in terms of the bone temperature elevations caused by drilling performed at 1500 rpm, under an axial load of 2 kg, and irrigation with 40 mL/min of saline solution at 25 °C. Temperature measurements were performed on porcine femoral pieces, in the middle of the cortical bone layer, at 1 mm from the edge of the osteotomy. The mean temperature rise was 3.2 °C for a cylindrical sleeve guide, 2.7 °C for a C-shaped open-sleeve guide, and 2.1 °C for the guide with an incorporated coolant channel. According to a one-way ANOVA, the differences between these means were marginally insignificant (p = 0.056). The individual values of the peak temperature change remained below the bone damage threshold (10 °C) in all cases. Remarkably, the distribution of the recorded temperatures was the narrowest for the guide with internal irrigation, suggesting that, besides the most effective cooling, it provides the most precise control of the intraosseous temperature. Further studies could test different design variants, experimental models (including live animals), and might involve computer simulations of the bone temperature field.
ABSTRACT
Two-dimensional cephalometry is widely used for monitoring orthodontic treatments and for quantifying the outcome of maxillofacial surgery. Despite careful use of a cephalostat, successive radiographs might differ due to slight differences in patient posture. This study evaluates the reliability of lateral cephalometric measurements and estimates the impact of patient positioning on this reliability. We studied cephalograms of 104 patients; 31 of them had two radiographs because the first was deemed unsuitable for cephalometric analysis. Using AudaxCeph 3.0 (Audax, Ljubljana, Slovenia), two observers traced each cephalogram twice, one month apart. We evaluated intra- and interobserver agreement via Bland-Altman analysis, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement, and smallest detectable difference (SDD). First, we studied the reliability of the hard tissue part of the Tweed-Merrifield analysis for 73 single cephalograms and for the better ones of patients with two exposures. Then, we studied 31 unsatisfactory cephalograms, and the ones recorded at improved patient posture. Although intraobserver bias was less than 0.5° or 0.3 mm, interobserver bias was significant for most measurements. Intraobserver reliability was high (ICC > 0.9), whereas interobserver reliability was good (ICC > 0.83) except for FMPA, FMIA and OP. Head rotations and inclinations had little impact on reliability (e.g., interobserver SDD decreased for 3 of 11 measurements). We conclude that averaging the positions of bilateral structures enables a reliable cephalometric analysis in spite of imprecise patient posture. Retaking cephalograms is ethically questionable in such cases.
