ABSTRACT
The current nursing shortage is not a routine swinging of the supply pendulum. Indeed, this shortage is determined to be quantitatively and qualitatively different from those of the past (Kimball & O'Neil, 2002). In Cincinnati, Ohio, nurse leaders decided that the uniqueness of this shortage necessitated new strategies. Hospital nurse executives proposed the creation of a community leadership group, and other Cincinnati nurse leaders enthusiastically embraced the idea. A collaborative effort was initiated in the spring of 2000 between a representative group of hospital chief nursing officers, school of nursing deans and faculty, staff nurses, hospital nurse recruiters, and professional nursing organizations to address concerns related to the nursing shortage. This article describes the process and outcomes of this collaborative effort with a focus on the retention of hospital nurses.
Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Interprofessional Relations , Leadership , Nurse Administrators/organization & administration , Nursing Staff, Hospital/organization & administration , Personnel Selection/organization & administration , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Chief Executive Officers, Hospital/organization & administration , Educational Status , Faculty, Nursing/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Nurse Administrators/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/education , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Ohio , Organizational Innovation , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Societies, Nursing/organization & administrationABSTRACT
CONTEXT: Poor public knowledge of stroke warning signs and risk factors limits effective stroke intervention and prevention. OBJECTIVE: To examine temporal trends in public knowledge of stroke warning signs and risk factors. DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based random-digit telephone survey conducted in July-November 2000 among individuals in the greater Cincinnati, Ohio, region. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2173 survey respondents (69% response rate) were randomly identified based on their demographic similarities to the ischemic stroke population with regard to age, race, and sex. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Spontaneous recall of at least 1 important stroke warning sign and 1 established stroke risk factor in comparison with findings from the same survey in 1995. RESULTS: In 2000, 70% of respondents correctly named at least 1 established stroke warning sign vs 57% in 1995 (P<.001), and 72% correctly named at least 1 established stroke risk factor vs 68% in 1995. Groups of individuals with the highest risk and incidence of stroke, such as persons at least 75 years old, blacks, and men, were the least knowledgeable about warning signs and risk factors. Television was the most frequently cited source of knowledge, 32% in 2000 vs 24% in 1995 (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Public knowledge of stroke warning signs within the greater Cincinnati region has significantly improved from 1995 to 2000, although knowledge of stroke risk factors did not improve significantly during the same time period. Public education efforts must continue and should focus on groups at the highest risk of stroke.
