Prospective audit comparing intrathecal analgesia (incorporating midazolam) with epidural and intravenous analgesia after major open abdominal surgery.

Potentiation of opioid analgesia can be achieved by the addition of midazolam intrathecally. At our institution, analgesia following open abdominal surgery is provided by continuous infusion of analgesic solutions either intravenously, intrathecally (incorporating midazolam) or epidurally. We report the results of a study comparing outcomes with these three analgesic regimens following major open abdominal surgery. This was an unblinded prospective audit of pain service intervention rates, pain scores and other outcomes after intravenous, intrathecal and epidural analgesia after open abdominal surgery in patients over 60 years of age. Both elective and emergency cases were included over a nine-month period. Patients ventilated for 24 hours or more were excluded. The analgesic regimens were as follows: (1) Intravenous: patient controlled analgesia with morphine+ketamine infusion 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg/h. (2) Intrathecal: (morphine 10 microg/ml+midazolam 100 microg/ml+bupivacaine 0.05%) commenced at 2 ml/h. (3) Epidural: bupivacaine 0.125% +fentanyl 2 microg/ml at 6 to 14 ml/h. Co-analgesic administration was as per our usual practice but was not standardised. The median number of calls per patient to the pain service differed between the intravenous (1), intrathecal (1) and epidural (3) groups. The number of unintentional analgesic regimen terminations differed between the intravenous (1), intrathecal (1) and epidural (5) groups. Pain scores differed significantly between groups and were lowest in the intrathecal group at all time points. The findings indicate that the intrathecal group had both a low requirement for postoperative interventions/resources and excellent analgesia. It appears to be a suitable alternative to the other techniques.

Continuing medical education: a needs analysis of anaesthetists.

The continuing medical education (CME) needs of anaesthetists within Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore have been largely unknown. The aim of this study was to undertake a comprehensive survey of the attitude to CME, learning preferences, attitudes and abilities relating to self-paced material, literature and information searching, preferred content and preferred approach to CME of anaesthetists within these countries. A survey tool was developed and refined for ease of use by pilot-testing. The survey was mailed to 3,156 anaesthetists throughout Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, Malaysia and Singapore. Three options for data return were offered; postal reply, facsimile and a data entry web-page. There were 1,800 responses, which represented a response rate of 57%. The demographics of the respondents were similar to the overall demographics of Fellows of the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. A large majority of respondents (92%) stated that their involvement in CME improved patient care. However, almost half the respondents reported that they have difficulty either in participating in current CME activities (31%) or implementing new knowledge into their workplace (14%). Anaesthetists within this region appear to be motivated by the need to make better decisions based on independent standards of practice. While Australia is a world leader in flexible education, it is still emerging as a discipline. Flexible education may be used to facilitate anaesthetists' participation in CME activities and in implementation of new knowledge in their workplace.

Antinociceptive properties of neurosteroids: a comparison of alphadolone and alphaxalone in potentiation of opioid antinociception.

In this study, we investigated the antinociceptive and sedative effects of the opioids fentanyl, morphine, and oxycodone given alone and in combination with two neurosteroids: alphadolone and alphaxalone. An open-field activity monitor and rotarod apparatus were used to define the sedative effects caused by opioid and neurosteroid compounds given alone intraperitoneally to male Wistar rats. Dose-response curves for antinociception were constructed using only nonsedative doses of these drugs. At nonsedating doses, fentanyl, morphine, and oxycodone all caused dose-dependent tail flick latency (TFL) antinociceptive effects. Because neither neurosteroid altered TFL, electrical current was used as the test to determine doses of neurosteroid that caused antinociceptive effects at nonsedative doses. Alphadolone 10 mg/kg intraperitoneally caused significant antinociceptive effects in the electrical test but alphaxalone did not. All three opioid dose-response curves for TFL antinociception were shifted to the left by coadministration of alphadolone even though alphadolone alone had no effect on TFL. Alphaxalone given alone had no antinociceptive effects at nonsedative doses and it had no effect on opioid antinociception. Neither neurosteroid caused sedative effects when combined with opioids. We conclude that coadministration of alphadolone, but not alphaxalone, with morphine, fentanyl, or oxycodone potentiates antinociception and that this effect is not caused by an increase in sedation.