Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Surg Res ; 191(1): 203-7, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24791645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Central venous pressure (CVP) is traditionally obtained through subclavian or internal jugular central catheters; however, many patients who could benefit from CVP monitoring have only femoral lines. The accuracy of illiac venous pressure (IVP) as a measure of CVP is unknown, particularly following laparotomy. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study. Patients who had both internal jugular or subclavian lines and femoral lines already in place were eligible for the study. Pressure measurements were taken from both lines in addition to measurement of bladder pressure, mean arterial pressure, and peak airway pressure. Data were evaluated using paired t-test, Bland-Altman analysis, and linear regression. RESULTS: Measurements were obtained from 40 patients, 26 of which had laparotomy. The mean difference between measurements was 2.2 mm Hg. There were no significant differences between patients who had laparotomy and nonsurgical patients (P = 0.93). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a bias of 1.63 ± 2.44 mm Hg. There was no correlation between IVP accuracy and bladder pressure, mean arterial pressure, or peak airway pressure. CONCLUSIONS: IVP is an adequate measure of CVP, even in surgical patients who have had recent laparotomy. Measurement of IVP to guide resuscitation is encouraged in patients who have only femoral venous catheter access.


Subject(s)
Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Central Venous Pressure/physiology , Iliac Vein/physiology , Laparotomy , Postoperative Care/methods , Female , Femoral Vein , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Pressure , Prospective Studies , Urinary Bladder/physiology , Vena Cava, Inferior/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...