Sylimarin Versus Essential Phospholipids in Metabolic Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) - A Prospective Comparative Randomized Trial.

Introduction:Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is an entity with a growing incidence but only a few pharmacological options. In Romania, the prevalence of MASLD has been increasing, while that of viral hepatitis has been decreasing. The purpose of this study is to compare two supplements for the treatment of MASLD. Methods:Between January 2020 and May 2022, 90 patients with MASLD were randomized to receive either silymarin 150 mg b.i.d (45 subjects) or essential phospholipids (EPLs) 825 mg b.i.d. (45 subjects) for six months. All study participants received recommendations for lifestyle and diet modifications. Assessment of the severity of steatosis and liver fibrosis was performed using FibroScan® with controlled attenuated parameter (CAP) at the beginning and end of treatment. Results:A total of 68 patients completed the trial. The two groups were statistically comparable in terms of clinical, biological and FibroScanR parameters. Aspartate transferase (AST) decreased from a median of 40 to 28 IU/L in the EPL arm (compared to 25→¨25.5 IU/L in the silymarin arm) (p-value=0.11) and alanine transaminase (ALT) decreased from 46 to 37.5 IU/L (compared to 31→30 IU/L) (p-value = 0.38). Plasma cholesterol levels also decreased significantly in the EPL group (218→189.5 mg/dL) compared to the silymarin arm (217→209 mg/dL) (p = 0.01). At the end of treatment, liver stiffness decreased by 0.7 KPa (6.9→6.2 KPa) in the EPL group but increased by 2.3 KPa (7.2→9.5 KPa) in the silymarin group (p = 0.1). The reduction in hepatic steatosis was comparable between the two groups: it decreased by 5% of the initial value. Conclusion:In our study, a six-month treatment with EPLs was superior to silymarin in MASLD patients because it succeeded in improving both laboratory parameters and liver fibrosis, as estimated by FibroScan®.

GC-MS Analysis of Methadone and EDDP in Addicted Patients under Methadone Substitution Treatment: Comparison of Urine and Plasma as Biological Samples.

(1) Background: Methadone, along with buprenorphine, is the most commonly used drug for the treatment of opioid dependence. This study aimed to analyze methadone and its major metabolite, 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenyl pyrrolidine (EDDP), in the urine and plasma of opiate addicts. The study group consisted of drug users voluntarily admitted to the detoxification center C.E.T.T.T. "St. Stelian" of Bucharest. Secondly, the study aimed to identify whether urine or plasma provides better results for the proposed method. (2) Methods: A GC-MS method, using an internal standard (diphenylamine) in the FULL-SCAN and SIM modes of operation and using the m/z = 72 ion for methadone and the m/z = 277 ion for EDDP, combined with a liquid-liquid extraction procedure was performed. (3) Results: The applied procedure allows the detection and quantification of methadone in both urine and plasma samples. EDDP was identified in patients with higher levels of methadone. Higher levels of methadone were detected in urine than in plasma samples. (4) Conclusions: This procedure can be used in clinical laboratories for the rapid determination of methadone levels in urine rather than in plasma. The procedure can be applied for the monitoring of methadone substitution treatment.

Real World Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir + Velpatasvir + Voxilaprevir in Romanian Patients with Genotype 1b HCV Infection Non-reponders to DAAs Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The sofosbuvir (SOF) / velpatasvir (VEL) / voxilaprevir (VOX) combination has been evaluated in more than 800 patients enrolled in phase II and phase III studies, where it demonstrated excellent safety and efficacy, achieving overall sustained viral response (SVR) rates of more than 95%. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of SOF/VEL/VOX in a real-world study, including patients previously treated for genotype 1b hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection that did not obtain a sustained viral response with previous direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) therapy. METHODS: In Romania, through a nationwide government-funded program in 2019-2020, 213 patients with chronic hepatitis C non-responders to previous DAAs therapy, received treatment with SOF/VEL/ VOX 400/100/100 mg/day for 12 weeks. We performed a retrospective longitudinal study that included 143 individuals who were treated in Bucharest, Iași, Craiova and Constanța clinics, all with genotype 1b HCV infection. Efficacy was assessed by the percentage of patients achieving SVR 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). Serious adverse events (SAE) were registered. RESULTS: Our cohort comprised 53% males with a median age of 60 years (27÷77); 47% were pre-treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir+dasabuvir ± ribavirin, 40% with ledipasvir/SOF, 13% with elbasvir/ grazoprevir. 42% of patients associated co-morbidities, 45% had compensated liver cirrhosis, 2% had treated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 1% had hepatitis B virus co-infection. SVR by intention to treat was reported in 139/143 (97.2%) and per protocol in 141/143 (98.6%). No predictive factors for SVR were identified. Rate of liver decompensation in patients with cirrhosis was 6% and was statistically associated in multivariate analysis with Child-Pugh score (p<0.01) and with severe steatosis (p=0.004). Occurrence of new HCC was reported in 3.6% of all patients with cirrhosis and was associated with poor liver function [higher Child-Pugh score (p=0.001) and low albumin levels (p=0.02)]. Serious adverse events related to therapy were reported in 1/143(0.7%). CONCLUSIONS: SOF/VEL/VOX was highly efficient in our population of patients with a 97.2% SVR. Liver decompensation occurred in 6% of cirrhotic patients at SVR, related to hepatic dysfunction.