Overcoming Taxane Resistance: Preclinical and Phase 1 Studies of Relacorilant, a Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator, with Nab-Paclitaxel in Solid Tumors.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy resistance remains a major problem in many solid tumors, including breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer. Glucocorticoids are one potential driver of chemotherapy resistance as they can mediate tumor progression via induction of cell-survival pathways. We investigated whether combining the selective glucocorticoid receptor (GR) modulator relacorilant with taxanes can enhance antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The effect of relacorilant on paclitaxel efficacy was assessed in OVCAR5 cells in vitro and in the MIA PaCa-2 xenograft. A phase 1 study of patients with advanced solid tumors was conducted to determine the recommended phase 2 dose of relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel. RESULTS: In OVCAR5 cells, relacorilant reversed the deleterious effects of glucocorticoids on paclitaxel efficacy (P < 0.001). Compared with paclitaxel alone, relacorilant + paclitaxel reduced tumor growth and slowed time to progression in xenograft models (both P < 0.0001). In the heavily pretreated phase 1 population [median (range) of prior regimens: 3 (1-8), prior taxane in 75.3% (55/73)], 33% (19/57) of response-evaluable patients achieved durable disease control (≥16 weeks) with relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel and 28.6% (12/42) experienced longer duration of benefit than on prior taxane (up to 6.4×). The most common dose-limiting toxicity of the combination was neutropenia, which was manageable with prophylactic G-CSF. Clinical benefit with relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel was also associated with GR-regulated transcript-level changes in a panel of GR-controlled genes. CONCLUSIONS: The observed preclinical, clinical, and GR-specific pharmacodynamic responses demonstrate that selective GR modulation with relacorilant combined with nab-paclitaxel may promote chemotherapy response and is tolerable. Further evaluation of this combination in tumor types responsive to taxanes is ongoing.

Effect of Miricorilant, a Selective Glucocorticoid Receptor Modulator, on Olanzapine-Associated Weight Gain in Healthy Subjects: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

PURPOSE: Antipsychotic medications, including olanzapine, are associated with substantial weight gain and metabolic disturbances. We sought to determine whether coadministration of miricorilant, a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator, with olanzapine can ameliorate these effects. METHODS: Sixty-six healthy men were enrolled in a 2-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The primary objective was to evaluate changes in body weight after 14 days coadministration of olanzapine (10 mg) + miricorilant (600 mg) compared with olanzapine (10 mg) + placebo. Secondary objectives included evaluating (a) the safety and tolerability of the combination; (b) the effects of the combination on glucose, insulin, insulin resistance, and triglycerides; and (c) the impact of the combination on hepatic enzymes. RESULTS: Subjects administered olanzapine + miricorilant gained less weight than subjects administered olanzapine + placebo (mean weight gain on day 15, 3.91 kg vs 4.98 kg; difference between groups, -1.07 kg; 95% confidence interval, -1.94 to -0.19; P = 0.017]). Compared with the placebo group, coadministration of miricorilant with olanzapine was associated with smaller increases in insulin (difference, -3.74 mIU/L; P = 0.007), homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (difference, -0.47; P = 0.007), triglycerides (difference, -0.29 mmol/L; P = 0.057), aspartate aminotransferase (difference, -32.24 IU/L; P = 0.009), and alanine aminotransferase (difference, -49.99 IU/L; P = 0.030). CONCLUSIONS: Miricorilant may provide a promising option for ameliorating the detrimental effects of olanzapine, and investigation of this medication in patients affected by antipsychotic-induced weight gain is warranted. Two phase 2 studies of miricorilant in patients with recent and long-standing antipsychotic-induced weight gain are currently in progress.

Talazoparib Exposure-Efficacy Analysis in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations in the EMBRACA Trial.

In the phase 3 EMBRACA trial, treatment with the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, talazoparib, led to significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-0.71; P < .0001). We conducted an exposure-efficacy analysis using EMBRACA data from 285 patients who were treated with talazoparib and had available pharmacokinetic parameters to evaluate the effect of talazoparib exposure (time-varying average talazoparib concentration [Cavg,t ]) and other baseline variables on PFS. Graphical examination of the relationship between Cavg,t and PFS and a Cox proportional model were used. Exposure-response analyses showed that higher talazoparib exposure, absence of visceral disease, lower baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels, and disease-free interval >12 months were independent covariates associated with longer PFS. The association of talazoparib exposure with PFS (higher exposure, longer PFS) suggests the recommended starting dose of 1 mg once daily (the maximum tolerated dose) is appropriate.

Exposure-Safety Analyses of Talazoparib in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA1/2 Mutations in the EMBRACA and ABRAZO Trials.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, such as talazoparib, may affect hematopoiesis. This analysis characterized the relationship between talazoparib exposure and the most common grade ≥ 3 hematopoietic adverse events (AEs) leading to dose modification in the phase 2 (ABRAZO) and phase 3 (EMBRACA) trials. The relationship between time-varying average talazoparib concentration (Cavg,t ), along with other baseline variables, and grade ≥ 3 anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia were evaluated both by graphical examination and using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. The results indicated that higher Cavg,t was associated with a higher risk of anemia and thrombocytopenia. A trend toward an association between higher Cavg,t and neutropenia was observed, although not statistically significant. Higher risk of all tested safety end points was associated with lower baseline hemoglobin. Higher risk of neutropenia was associated with lower baseline absolute neutrophil count and lower body weight. These findings support the proposed management of AEs through talazoparib dosing modification.

Outcomes in Clinically Relevant Patient Subgroups From the EMBRACA Study: Talazoparib vs Physician's Choice Standard-of-Care Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Talazoparib is a poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that causes death in cells with breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 (BRCA1/2) mutations. METHODS: EMBRACA (NCT01945775) was a randomized phase III study comparing efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of talazoparib (1 mg) with physician's choice of chemotherapy (PCT: capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, vinorelbine) in locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer with a germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutation. Prespecified patient subgroups were analyzed for progression-free survival, objective response, clinical benefit, duration of response, and safety. PROs were evaluated in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subgroups. RESULTS: Of 431 patients, 287 were randomly assigned to talazoparib and 144 to PCT. Prespecified subgroup analyses showed prolonged progression-free survival with talazoparib (HR+/HER2-: hazard ratio = 0.47, 95% confidence interval = 0.32 to 0.71; TNBC: hazard ratio = 0.60, 95% confidence interval = 0.41 to 0.87) and greater objective response rate (odds ratio = 1.97 to 11.89), clinical benefit rate (odds ratio = 2.05 to 7.77), and duration of response with talazoparib in all subgroups. PROs in HR+/HER2- and TNBC subgroups showed consistent overall improvement and delay in time to definitive clinically meaningful deterioration with talazoparib vs PCT. Across subgroups, common adverse events included anemia, fatigue, and nausea with talazoparib and neutropenia, fatigue, and nausea with PCT. Seven patients (2.4%) receiving talazoparib had grade II alopecia and 22.7% had grade I alopecia. CONCLUSIONS: Across all patient subgroups with gBRCA-mutated advanced breast cancer, talazoparib demonstrated clinically significant superiority in outcomes compared with PCT.

Talazoparib in Patients with a Germline BRCA-Mutated Advanced Breast Cancer: Detailed Safety Analyses from the Phase III EMBRACA Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the EMBRACA phase III study (NCT01945775), talazoparib was associated with a significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with physician's choice of chemotherapy (PCT) in germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). Herein, the safety profile of talazoparib is explored in detail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall, 412 patients received ≥1 dose of talazoparib (n = 286) or PCT (n = 126). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated, including timing, duration, and potential overlap of selected AEs. The relationship between talazoparib plasma exposure and grade ≥3 anemia was analyzed. Time-varying Cox proportional hazard models assessed the impact of dose reductions on PFS. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with common AEs and health resource utilization (HRU) were assessed in both treatment arms. RESULTS: The most common AEs with talazoparib were hematologic (195 [68.2%] patients) and typically occurred within the first 3-4 months of receiving talazoparib. Grade 3-4 anemia lasted approximately 7 days for both arms. Overlapping grade 3-4 hematologic AEs were infrequent with talazoparib. Higher talazoparib exposure was associated with grade ≥3 anemia. Permanent discontinuation of talazoparib due to hematologic AEs was low (<2%). A total of 150 (52.4%) patients receiving talazoparib had AEs associated with dose reduction. Hematologic toxicities were managed by supportive care medication (including transfusion) and dose modifications. Among patients with anemia or nausea and/or vomiting AEs, PROs favored talazoparib. After accounting for the treatment-emergent period, talazoparib was generally associated with a lower rate of hospitalization and supportive care medication use compared with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Talazoparib was associated with superior efficacy, favorable PROs, and lower HRU rate versus chemotherapy in gBRCA-mutated ABC. Toxicities were manageable with talazoparib dose modification and supportive care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Talazoparib was generally well tolerated in patients with germline BRCA-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer in the EMBRACA trial. Common toxicities with talazoparib were primarily hematologic and infrequently resulted in permanent drug discontinuation (<2% of patients discontinued talazoparib due to hematologic toxicity). Hematologic toxicities typically occurred during the first 3-4 months of treatment and were managed by dose modifications and supportive care measures. A significant efficacy benefit, improved patient-reported outcomes, lower rate of health resource utilization and a tolerable safety profile support incorporating talazoparib into routine management of germline BRCA-mutated locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer.

Enzalutamide for the Treatment of Androgen Receptor-Expressing Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Purpose Studies suggest that a subset of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have tumors that express the androgen receptor (AR) and may benefit from an AR inhibitor. This phase II study evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of enzalutamide in patients with locally advanced or metastatic AR-positive TNBC. Patients and Methods Tumors were tested for AR with an immunohistochemistry assay optimized for breast cancer; nuclear AR staining > 0% was considered positive. Patients received enzalutamide 160 mg once per day until disease progression. The primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 16 weeks. Secondary end points included CBR at 24 weeks, progression-free survival, and safety. End points were analyzed in all enrolled patients (the intent-to-treat [ITT] population) and in patients with one or more postbaseline assessment whose tumor expressed ≥ 10% nuclear AR (the evaluable subgroup). Results Of 118 patients enrolled, 78 were evaluable. CBR at 16 weeks was 25% (95% CI, 17% to 33%) in the ITT population and 33% (95% CI, 23% to 45%) in the evaluable subgroup. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 3.7 months) in the ITT population and 3.3 months (95% CI, 1.9 to 4.1 months) in the evaluable subgroup. Median overall survival was 12.7 months (95% CI, 8.5 months to not yet reached) in the ITT population and 17.6 months (95% CI, 11.6 months to not yet reached) in the evaluable subgroup. Fatigue was the only treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse event with an incidence of > 2%. Conclusion Enzalutamide demonstrated clinical activity and was well tolerated in patients with advanced AR-positive TNBC. Adverse events related to enzalutamide were consistent with its known safety profile. This study supports additional development of enzalutamide in advanced TNBC.

Androgen Receptor Immunohistochemistry as a Companion Diagnostic Approach to Predict Clinical Response to Enzalutamide in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: The androgen receptor (AR) is increasingly recognized as a potential biomarker for identifying a subset of patients with possible hormonally driven triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, its performance as a companion diagnostic remains elusive. Thus, we evaluated AR expression by immunohistochemistry in patients with advanced TNBC before treatment with the AR inhibitor enzalutamide. METHODS: We optimized and validated immunohistochemistry assays in breast and prostate cancer cell lines and tissues using two commercial AR monoclonal antibodies (SP107 and AR441). AR expression was then examined in patients with advanced TNBC enrolled in a phase II study of enzalutamide (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01889238) on archived or fresh tissue before treatment. Association with clinical response was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), drop-out rate, and survival. RESULTS: AR expression was detected in 80% and 63% of breast cancer tissue using SP107 and AR441, respectively. SP107 was selected for additional analyses because of its higher sensitivity and robustness. Total AR nuclear staining demonstrated the best accuracy in predicting clinical response (area under receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.72; P = .0001). At a threshold of 10%, 74.6% of patients were AR positive, leading to 30% PPV, 90% sensitivity, and 30% specificity. These patients showed a significantly higher median progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.88; P = .011) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.91; P = .019) compared with those with AR-negative (< 10%) TNBC. CONCLUSION: At a threshold of ≥ 10% nuclear expression, the AR was associated with TNBC response to enzalutamide. However, the modest PPV may restrict its clinical application, and additional diagnostic tools may be helpful for improved patient selection.

Changes in Brain Volume with Bapineuzumab in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Bapineuzumab, an anti-amyloid-ß monoclonal antibody, was evaluated in two placebo-controlled trials in APOE*ɛ4 carriers and noncarriers, respectively, with Alzheimer's disease. OBJECTIVES: A volumetric magnetic resonance imaging substudy was performed to determine if bapineuzumab altered brain volume rate of change. METHODS: Bapineuzumab dosages included 0.5 mg/kg in carriers and 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg in noncarriers, every 13 weeks for 78 weeks. Volumetric outcomes included annualized brain, ventricular, and mean hippocampal boundary shift integrals (BBSI; VBSI; HBSI) up to Week 71. Treatment differences were estimated using mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: For BBSI and HBSI, there were no significant treatment-related differences within either study, but, compared to pooled carriers and noncarriers receiving placebo, noncarriers receiving1.0 mg/kg bapineuzumab had greater increases in these measures. Bapineuzumab-treated patients showed significantly greater VBSI rates compared with placebo for 0.5 mg/kg in carriers and 1.0 mg/kg (but not 0.5 mg/kg) in noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: Bapineuzumab produced an increase in ventricular volume compared with placebo. Etiology for this increase is unclear but may be related to amyloid-ß clearance or its consequences.

Two phase 3 trials of bapineuzumab in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Bapineuzumab, a humanized anti-amyloid-beta monoclonal antibody, is in clinical development for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. METHODS: We conducted two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials involving patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease--one involving 1121 carriers of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele and the other involving 1331 noncarriers. Bapineuzumab or placebo, with doses varying by study, was administered by intravenous infusion every 13 weeks for 78 weeks. The primary outcome measures were scores on the 11-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-cog11, with scores ranging from 0 to 70 and higher scores indicating greater impairment) and the Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating less impairment). A total of 1090 carriers and 1114 noncarriers were included in the efficacy analysis. Secondary outcome measures included findings on positron-emission tomographic amyloid imaging with the use of Pittsburgh compound B (PIB-PET) and cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau (phospho-tau) concentrations. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in the primary outcomes. At week 78, the between-group differences in the change from baseline in the ADAS-cog11 and DAD scores (bapineuzumab group minus placebo group) were -0.2 (P=0.80) and -1.2 (P=0.34), respectively, in the carrier study; the corresponding differences in the noncarrier study were -0.3 (P=0.64) and 2.8 (P=0.07) with the 0.5-mg-per-kilogram dose of bapineuzumab and 0.4 (P=0.62) and 0.9 (P=0.55) with the 1.0-mg-per-kilogram dose. The major safety finding was amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema among patients receiving bapineuzumab, which increased with bapineuzumab dose and APOE ε4 allele number and which led to discontinuation of the 2.0-mg-per-kilogram dose. Between-group differences were observed with respect to PIB-PET and cerebrospinal fluid phospho-tau concentrations in APOE ε4 allele carriers but not in noncarriers. CONCLUSIONS: Bapineuzumab did not improve clinical outcomes in patients with Alzheimer's disease, despite treatment differences in biomarkers observed in APOE ε4 carriers. (Funded by Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy and Pfizer; Bapineuzumab 301 and 302 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00575055 and NCT00574132, and EudraCT number, 2009-012748-17.).

Central nervous system metastases in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: incidence, treatment, and survival in patients from registHER.

PURPOSE: registHER is a prospective, observational study of 1,023 newly diagnosed HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Baseline characteristics of patients with and without central nervous system (CNS) metastases were compared; incidence, time to development, treatment, and survival after CNS metastases were assessed. Associations between treatment after CNS metastases and survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 1,012 patients who had confirmed HER2-positive tumors, 377 (37.3%) had CNS metastases. Compared with patients with no CNS metastases, those with CNS metastases were younger and more likely to have hormone receptor-negative disease and higher disease burden. Median time to CNS progression among patients without CNS disease at initial MBC diagnosis (n = 302) was 13.3 months. Treatment with trastuzumab, chemotherapy, or surgery after CNS diagnosis was each associated with a statistically significant improvement in median overall survival (OS) following diagnosis of CNS disease (unadjusted analysis: trastuzumab vs. no trastuzumab, 17.5 vs. 3.8 months; chemotherapy vs. no chemotherapy, 16.4 vs. 3.7 months; and surgery vs. no surgery, 20.3 vs. 11.3 months). Although treatment with radiotherapy seemed to prolong median OS (13.9 vs. 8.4 months), the difference was not significant (P = 0.134). Results of multivariable proportional hazards analyses confirmed the independent significant effects of trastuzumab and chemotherapy (HR = 0.33, P < 0.001; HR = 0.64, P = 0.002, respectively). The effects of surgery and radiotherapy did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.062 and P = 0.898, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with HER2-positive MBC evaluated in registHER, the use of trastuzumab, chemotherapy, and surgery following CNS metastases were each associated with longer survival.

Evaluation of the abuse potential of extended release hydromorphone versus immediate release hydromorphone.

Immediate release (IR) hydromorphone has experienced significant misuse and abuse. An extended release (ER) hydromorphone formulation has been developed to provide sustained pain relief and may reduce the likelihood for abuse by delaying absorption. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, 2-part crossover study, the abuse potential of single oral doses of hydromorphone ER (intact: 16-, 32-, and 64-mg; milled: 8-mg) was compared with 8-mg hydromorphone IR and placebo. After drug administration, subjects with a history of recreational opioid use completed a series of assessments, including subjective effects visual analog scales (eg, drug liking) and Addiction Research Center Inventory With Cole Modification, at several timepoints up to 48 hours postdose. Independent of formulation, maximum at-the-moment drug liking was higher for hydromorphone versus placebo. Maximum drug liking occurred earlier and was higher for 8-mg IR versus 16-mg ER but similar to 32- and 64-mg ER. Most positive effects were lower after 16-mg ER compared with other doses, including 8-mg IR. Bad drug effects were higher for hydromorphone ER, particularly the 64-mg dose. Milled 8-mg ER produced similar subjective effects to 8-mg IR. Comparison of scores after administration of 8-mg IR on 2 separate occasions showed that most assessments exhibited good test-retest reliability, although some scores declined marginally between test and retest. Delayed onset of good drug effects and prominent bad drug effects of hydromorphone ER suggest that, when administered intact, this formulation may have lower abuse potential than hydromorphone IR.

Long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of OROS hydromorphone in patients with chronic pain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of long-term repeated dosing of OROS hydromorphone in chronic pain patients. DESIGN: This multicenter, open-label extension trial enrolled patients from three short-term OROS hydromorphone trials. SETTING: Fifty-six centers in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Adults with chronic cancer pain or chronic nonmalignant pain who were receiving stable doses of OROS hydromorphone (> or = 8 mg/day). Three hundred and eighty-eight patients were enrolled, 106 patients completed at least 12 months of therapy. INTERVENTIONS: OROS hydromorphone (individualized doses) was administered once daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Safety and efficacy (Brief Pain Inventory and patient and investigator global evaluations) were assessed at monthly visits. RESULTS: The median duration of extended OROS hydromorphone therapy was 274 days. The median daily dose of study medication was 32.0 mg at extension-study baseline, 40.0 mg at month 3, and 48.0 mg at months 6, 9, and 12, respectively. The most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (n = 93, 24.0 percent) and constipation (n = 75, 19.3 percent). The analgesic effects of OROS hydromorphone, assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory, were maintained throughout the extension. At 12 months, 72.4 percent of patients and 75.9 percent of investigators rated overall treatment as good, very good, or excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily OROS hydromorphone is an osmotically driven, controlled-release preparation that may be particularly well suited to long-term use, because it provides consistent plasma concentrations and sustained around-the-clock analgesia. In this study, the benefits of OROS hydromorphone attained in short-term studies were maintained in the long-term when daily administration was continued.

Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily OROS hydromorphone and twice-daily extended-release oxycodone in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis pain: results of a 6-week, randomized, open-label, noninferiority analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of a once-daily controlled-release formulation of hydromorphone (OROS) hydromorphone, Janssen-Cilag, Beerse, Belgium) and twice-daily extended-release (ER) oxycodone in patients with chronic, moderate to severe osteoarthritis (OA) pain. OROS hydromorphone is currently available only in Europe. METHODS: Adults who met American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria for OA of the knee or hip with moderate to severe mean daily pain intensity despite chronic use of stable doses of NSAIDs or other nonsteroidal, nonopioid therapies were eligible for participation in this randomized, open-label study. The study consisted of a 14-day dose-titration and stabilization phase and a 28-day maintenance phase. OROS hydromorphone and ER oxycodone were initiated at dosages of 8 mg QD and 10 mg BID, respectively. Patients maintained diaries in which they rated their pain (from 0 = none to 3 = severe) and pain relief (from 0 = no relief to 4 = complete relief). Other assessments completed every 14 days included patient and investigator global evaluations of treatment effectiveness (scale from 1 = poor to 5 = excellent), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Osteoarthritis Index, and the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale. Adverse events (whether observed by study personnel, identified in response to questioning, or spontaneously reported) and vital signs were monitored throughout the study. The primary efficacy measures were the mean pain relief score at end point and the time from initiation of treatment to the third day of moderate to complete pain relief, as reported in the patient diary. Noninferiority analyses were conducted on all primary and secondary efficacy variables. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients (71 OROS hydromorphone, 67 ER oxycodone) received treatment (safety population), and 83 (60.1%) completed the study. Data from 124 patients were included in the efficacy analyses; the majority of these patients were white (85.5%) and female (69.4%), with a mean age of 63.6 years. The most commonly affected joint was the knee (79.8 %). At end point, the OROS hydromorphone group had a mean pain relief score of 2.3 (median, 2.0) and the ER oxycodone group had a mean pain relief score of 2.3 (median, 2.3) (95% CI, -0.30 to infinity). The mean time to the third day of moderate to complete pain relief was 6.2 days (median, 4.0) in the OROS hydromorphone group and 5.5 days (median, 5.0) in the ER oxycodone group (95% CI, -0.31 to infinity). Mean pain intensity decreased from baseline to end point by 0.6 point in the OROS hydromorphone group and by 0.4 point in the ER oxycodone group. Mean scores on the patient global evaluation improved by a respective 1.2 and 1.0 points (median, 1 in both groups). Approximately two thirds of patients in each group (67.2% and 66.7%) rated the overall effectiveness of treatment as good to excellent at end point. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in total WOMAC scores at end point, and similar improvements from baseline in the WOMAC physical function, stiffness, and pain scales were observed in both groups. Whereas MOS sleep outcomes scores improved from baseline in both groups, OROS hydromorphone was associated with a significantly greater improvement on the MOS Sleep Problems Index I compared with ER oxycodone (P < 0.045). Adverse events were comparable in both groups; the most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (35.2% and 29.9%), constipation (29.6% and 25.4%), somnolence (25.4% and 17.9%), vomiting (16.9% and 11.9%), and dizziness (14.1% and 22.4%). Adverse events led to study discontinuation in 35.2% (25/71) of patients in the OROS hydromorphone group and 32.8% (22/67) in the ER oxycodone group. Discontinuations due to adverse events during the titration phase were numerically greater in the OROS hydromorphone group (29.6% [21/71]) than in the ER oxycodone group (19.4% [13/67]). Only 1 serious adverse event (diarrhea in a patient receiving OROS hydromorphone) was considered possibly related to study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily OROS hydromorphone and twice-daily ER oxycodone provided similar pain relief in these patients with OA of the knee or hip. The tolerability profiles of the 2 agents were similar.

Impact of preoperative anemia on outcome in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND: The risk of preoperative anemia in patients undergoing heart surgery has not been described precisely. Specifically, the impact of low hemoglobin per se or combined with other risk factors on postoperative outcome is unknown. Thus, we determined the effects of low preoperative hemoglobin and comorbidities on postoperative adverse outcomes in patients with coronary artery bypass graft in a large comprehensive multicenter study. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia investigated 5065 patients with coronary artery bypass graft at 70 institutions worldwide, collecting approximately 7500 data points per patient. In 4804 patients who received no preoperative transfusions, we determined the association between lowest preoperative hemoglobin levels and in-hospital cardiac and noncardiac morbidity and mortality and the impact of concomitant risk factors, assessed by EuroSCORE, on this effect. In patients with EuroSCORE < 4 (n=2054), only noncardiac outcomes were increased, whereas patients with EuroSCORE > or = 4 (n=2750) showed an increased incidence of all postoperative events, starting at hemoglobin < 11 g/dL. Low preoperative hemoglobin was an independent predictor for noncardiac (renal > cerebral; P<0.001) outcomes, whereas the increase in cardiac events was due to other factors associated with preoperative anemia. CONCLUSIONS: Anemic patients undergoing cardiac surgery have an increased risk of postoperative adverse events. Importantly, the extent of preexisting comorbidities substantially affects perioperative anemia tolerance. Therefore, preoperative risk assessment and subsequent therapeutic strategies, such as blood transfusion, should take into account both the individual level of preoperative hemoglobin and the extent of concomitant risk factors.

Efficacy and safety evaluation of once-daily OROS hydromorphone in patients with chronic low back pain: a pilot open-label study (DO-127).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of once-daily osmotic controlled-release oral delivery system (OROS) hydromorphone in patients with chronic low back pain of moderate-to-severe intensity. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a 6-week, multicenter, nonrandomized, noncomparative, open-label, repeat-dose study of chronic (> or = 6 weeks) low back pain. The study comprised three periods: prior opioid stabilization (2-7 days); OROS hydromorphone conversion, titration, and stabilization (3-14 days); and OROS hydromorphone maintenance (28 days). Patients were evaluated weekly. Baseline pain assessment was performed at the end of prior opioid stabilization. For pain relief rating, endpoint was defined as the mean pain relief score from the last 2 nonmissing days before study termination. For other assessments, endpoint was defined as the last post-baseline evaluation. RESULTS: Of the 207 patients who received the study drug, 131 completed the trial. Scores (mean +/- SD) for Brief Pain Inventory 'worst pain in the last 24 hours' decreased significantly from baseline to endpoint (-0.8 +/- 2.06, p < 0.0001). The proportions of patients and investigators rating the global effectiveness as good, very good, or excellent increased from 31.6% at baseline while patients were on prior opioids to 63.2% at endpoint while patients received OROS hydromorphone, and from 29.8% at baseline while patients were on prior opioids to 65.8% at endpoint while patients received OROS hydromorphone, respectively. Daily pain relief ratings also increased significantly (+0.26 +/- 1.084, p = 0.0008). Significant improvements in health-related quality of life and sleep problems were observed. Adverse events were mild to moderate in severity; the most common of these were constipation, nausea, headache, and somnolence. The limitations of this study include its pilot-type design and the lack of comparison of OROS hydromorphone with a placebo or another drug. Additional comparative and longer-term studies are needed to confirm these findings. CONCLUSIONS: OROS hydromorphone may be an effective treatment for chronic low back pain of moderate-to-severe intensity. Adverse events were typical of those associated with opioid therapy.