[Story of a multi-professional health center in Lyon, France. Individuals, a group, serving complex patients.] / Histoire d'une maison de santé à Lyon (France). Un exercice coordonné pluridisciplinaire au service de patients complexes.

The Mermoz multi-professional health center is a healthcare practice, including 24 professionals, on the outskirts of a major French metropolis. This article presents the challenges faced from the idea to the implementation of an interprofessional primary care offer. The difficulty of freeing up time for the construction of the common real estate and sanitary project has been overcome thanks to powerful motivations: the desire for more interprofessionality in practices that are sometimes fragmented, the need for support in the management of complex patients, the pleasure of being a group, and the improvement of healthcare. The horizontal mode of governance enabled a health care offer adapted to the specific health needs of a multicultural and precarious sector to be combined with a place for teaching and research.

La maison de santé pluriprofessionnelle Mermoz est un jeune cabinet comprenant 24 personnes, en périphérie d'une grande métropole française. Cet article présente les choix retenus et les défis relevés depuis l'idée de sa création à la mise en place d'une offre de soins de premier recours interprofessionnelle. Les difficultés pour détacher du temps dédié à la construction d'un projet commun, aussi bien immobilier que sanitaire ont pu être résolues grâce à la motivation pour l'interprofessionnalité, le soutien dans la prise en charge de patients complexes, le plaisir d'être un groupe, et l'amélioration des pratiques de soins. Le mode de gouvernance horizontal a permis de combiner une offre de soins adaptée aux besoins en santé spécifiques d'un quartier multiculturel et précaire avec un lieu d'enseignement et de recherche.

Self-reported symptoms in French primary care SARS-CoV-2 patients: association with gender and age group.

INTRODUCTION: The early identification of COVID-19 patients is of outmost importance in the current pandemic. As with other pathogens, presenting symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 may vary, depending on sociodemographic factors. We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients by age/gender and to assess whether the diagnostic performance of these symptoms varied according to these variables. METHODS: We analysed data from a cross-sectional study involving primary care patients undergoing RT-PCR testing in Lyon, France. Among patients who tested positive, we examined whether there was an association between age/gender and various symptoms. In addition, we calculated the diagnostic performance of the most specific symptoms (smell/taste disorder). RESULTS: Among 1543 consecutive patients, 253 tested positive (16%). There were significant age/gender-related differences in symptoms. In middle-aged women, the diagnostic performance of smell/taste disorders were AUC = 0.65 [95%CI 0.59-0.71] and PPV = 72% [95%CI 53-87%], that is higher than in the entire sample (smell/taste disorders: AUC = 0.59 [95%CI 0.57-0.62] and PPV = 57% [95%CI 47-67%]. In contrast, the negative predictive values of smell/taste disorders were similar in both groups (85% [95%CI 81-89%] for middle-age women and 86% [95%CI 85-88%] for the entire sample). CONCLUSION: We found significant age/gender-related differences in the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients. Screening strategies based on smell/taste disorders performed better in middle-aged women, but could not ensure a diagnosis of COVID-19 in any subgroup of patients. Future diagnostic strategies should use age/gender differentiated approaches.

Cross sectional study of the clinical characteristics of French primary care patients with COVID-19.

The early identification of patients suffering from SARS-CoV-2 infection in primary care is of outmost importance in the current pandemic. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics of primary care patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. We conducted a cross-sectional study between March 24 and May 7, 2020, involving consecutive patients undergoing RT-PCR testing in two community-based laboratories in Lyon (France) for a suspicion of COVID-19. We examined the association between symptoms and a positive test using univariable and multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for clustering within laboratories, and calculated the diagnostic performance of these symptoms. Of the 1561 patients tested, 1543 patients (99%) agreed to participate. Among them, 253 were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (16%). The three most frequently reported 'ear-nose-throat' and non-'ear-nose-throat' symptoms in patients who tested positive were dry throat (42%), loss of smell (36%) and loss of taste (31%), respectively fever (58%), cough (52%) and headache (45%). In multivariable analyses, loss of taste (OR 3.8 [95% CI 3.3-4.4], p-value < 0.001), loss of smell (OR 3.0 [95% CI 1.9-4.8], p < 0.001), muscle pain (OR 1.6 [95% CI 1.2-2.0], p = 0.001) and dry nose (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.1-1.6], p = 0.01) were significantly associated with a positive result. In contrast, sore throat (OR 0.6 [95% CI 0.4-0.8], p = 0.003), stuffy nose (OR 0.6 [95% CI 0.6-0.7], p < 0.001), diarrhea (OR 0.6 [95% CI 0.5-0.6], p < 0.001) and dyspnea (OR 0.5 [95% CI 0.3-0.7], p < 0.001) were inversely associated with a positive test. The combination of loss of taste or smell had the highest diagnostic performance (OR 6.7 [95% CI 5.9-7.5], sensitivity 44.7% [95% CI 38.4-51.0], specificity 90.8% [95% CI 89.1-92.3]). No other combination of symptoms had a higher performance. Our data could contribute to the triage and early identification of new clusters of cases.

National institutions should improve the information made available to patients about cervical smears.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of the content of leaflets tools and websites of national institutions in United Kingdom and France informing patients about cervical smears. METHODS: We collected and analyzed the data and information on these two websites and leaflets made for patients. We screened those tools with the UP TO DATE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE IPDAS grid. RESULTS: None of the tools specify the level of evidence of the studies on which cervix cancer screening is based. The risk of complication due to cancer is poor. The effectiveness of screening in absolute value is not available. The risks and side-effects due to cervical smears are specified without the frequency. CONCLUSION: Information is truncated and pushes readers towards taking part in screening. This is not in accordance with the quality criteria of shared decision making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patients should take part in the creation of decision making tools, so that the information is the most suited to their representations and understanding. This is why the documents made available by institutions should be based on recognized scientific sources. Responsible of health programs should be independent and separated from those responsible of information tool creation.

Quality of evidence of the efficacy of therapeutic interventions on patient-important outcomes in Cochrane's systematic reviews' abstracts: A survey.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the proportion of therapeutics that have proven their efficacy on patient-important outcomes with a high quality of evidence among Cochrane systematic reviews (SRs). METHODS: We surveyed a random sample of 400 SRs' abstracts published between September 2012 and December 2015, which compared therapeutic interventions with at least a placebo or no intervention control. The primary endpoint was the proportion of SRs with a statistically significant efficacy on a patient-important outcome and with a high quality of evidence. RESULTS: Among the 400 abstracts surveyed, 32 (8%) found efficacy on a patient-important outcome with a high quality of evidence. Half of the 400 SRs (50.2%) evaluated a pharmacological intervention and 12% of these found efficacy of the intervention on a patient-important outcome with a reported high quality of evidence. CONCLUSION: Based on an analysis of 400 abstracts of SRs from the Cochrane Collaboration, we found that there is a low number of therapeutic interventions which have proven their efficacy on patient-important outcomes with a high quality of evidence.

Validity of the Good Practice Guidelines: The example of type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To assess the methodological quality of the systematic reviews of the literature for Good Practice Guidelines (GPGs) for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: The GPGs on treatment of T2D from May 2012 onwards were searched on PubMed, the Guidelines International Network, the National Guidelines Clearing House and the Infobanque des guides de pratique clinique. Quality of the GPGs was assessed by means of grading of levels of evidence, strength of recommendations, statements pertaining to systematic reviews, description of their methods, search for Randomized Controlled Trials meta-analyses, and citations from three meta-analyses which contested the strategy of intensive glycemic control and metformin as first-line treatment. RESULTS: Fiflty-two GPGs were included; half of them had and applied a system of grading and strength of recommendation and 58% stated they had carried out a systematic review. Only one GPG cited the three meta-analyses. Three quarters of the GPGs failed to detail their bibliographic research methods. CONCLUSION: The GPGs for treatment of T2D were of poor quality and their methodological rigor was insufficient. Even though the meta-analyses had a higher level of evidence, they were seldom cited.

Detection of adolescent suicidality in primary care: an international utility study of the bullying-insomnia-tobacco-stress test.

AIM: General practitioners (GPs) are ideally placed to identify suicidality in adolescents. However, adolescents are often reluctant to confide in their GPs about these problems, and GPs are not comfortable when questioning them about suicide. We previously proposed the BITS test, a set of four opening and four additional questions, to alert doctors about possible suicidality in an adolescent. We validated its use in the identification of suicidality ("frequent suicidal ideation or suicide attempts at one time or another)" in 15-year-old adolescents in a school setting. The objective of the present study was to assess the detection utility of this method in 13-to-18-year-olds in primary care. METHODS: We carried out a screening utility study in general practices in 17 French-speaking sites in four countries and three continents. Each GP was instructed to use the bullying, insomnia, tobacco, stress (BITS) test with five to ten 13-to-18-year-old adolescents, consulting consecutively, for any reason. They subsequently asked them questions about their suicidality. RESULTS: One hundred and two GPs tested a total of 693 adolescents; 13.0% of the adolescents (girls 15.4%, boys 9.9%) reported suicidality (1.6% known, 11.4% previously unknown). A score of at least 3 on the BITS scale was associated with suicidality (sensitivity: 65.9, specificity: 82.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The BITS test is a pragmatic instrument, alerting the GP to an adolescent's previously unknown suicidability, whatever the reason for consultation.

[Relevancy and efficacy of advanced nursing practice in private practice to promote smoking cessation]. / Pertinence et efficacité d'une pratique infirmière avancée en libéral dans le sevrage tabagique.

Raising awareness of the harmful effects of smoking on health and supporting smokers who wish to quit are important public health challenges. The involvement of nurses in these specific healthcare actions targeting the motivation to change seems to be a promising approach as revealed by a study summarised in this article.

Are patients' pejorative representations of buprenorphine associated with their level of addiction and of misuse?

BACKGROUND: In France, buprenorphine is at once the most widely prescribed and the most commonly misused opioid maintenance treatment (OMT). Unlike other medicines, it is seldom prescribed as a generic drug. Several studies have underlined the influence of the patient's representations when choosing brand-name rather than generic forms. We aim to prove a link between these pejorative representations and misuse, a higher degree of addiction and a preference for brand-name products. METHODS: An observational study carried out at 11 sites in France using self-assessment questionnaires filled out in dispensing pharmacies by patients having come to them for buprenorphine delivery. RESULTS: Analysis was based on 806 usable questionnaires. There indeed exists a significant correlation between pejorative representations of OMT by means of buprenorphine, and a higher degree of addiction and misuse (p < .0001 for each). Preference for the brand-name product is correlated with the representation of OMT as a "trap" (p = .020). CONCLUSION: Our results underscore the existence of a link between patients' negative representations of their OMT and their drug-taking behavior. Prescribing physicians should consequently take these representations into account to more precisely identify the relevant behaviors and help their patients to evolve positively.

Even if they are not aware of it, general practitioners improve well-being in their adolescent patients.

BACKGROUND: Most adolescents consult their general practitioner (GP) for common reasons, somatic or administrative but many of them have hidden feelings of distress. OBJECTIVES: To assess the immediate impact of 'ordinary' consultations on feelings of distress among adolescents and to compare adolescents experiencing difficulties (D) to those with no difficulties (N). To analyse how accurately GPs assess the impact of their consultation on adolescents' feelings. METHODS: GPs were randomly selected from two non-contiguous French administrative areas between April and June 2006. Fifty-three GPs gave two questionnaires to the first 10 to 15 adolescents aged 12 to 20 seen in consultation. One questionnaire was issued before the consultation and the other one afterwards. Adolescents had to position themselves about different aspects of well-being and say where they would seek help if they had problems. A GP questionnaire assessed how well they estimated their impact on the adolescent's feeling of well-being. RESULTS: Six hundred and sixty-five adolescents were assessed. They reported feeling better about their health, being able to talk, having someone to talk to or to confide in and on feeling understood. The D group (n = 147) felt significantly better compared to the N group (n = 518). GPs tended to underestimate this improvement, especially regarding adolescents in the D group feeling better about their health. CONCLUSIONS: Consulting a GP generates increased well-being among adolescents, especially for those experiencing difficulties. GPs tend to underestimate the positive impact they may have. Further studies are needed to explore if this benefit is permanent over time.

What do troubled adolescents expect from their GPs?

BACKGROUND: Adolescents often have emotional and behavioural problems that general practitioners are likely to miss. While nearly 80% of them consult their GP every year, it is usually for physical, not psychological reasons. Trust in their GPs in necessary for screening. OBJECTIVES: To identify the key quality desired by adolescents for them to feel free to confide in GPs. To determine whether this quality differed according to gender, level of at-risk behaviours or interlocutor: friend, parent or GP. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 182 French educational institutions chosen by lot. Fifteen-year-olds completed a self-administered questionnaire under examination conditions. While the questions on behaviour were drawn from the cross-national survey entitled 'Health behaviour in school-aged children (HBSC),' the questions on conditions conducive to trust were drawn from previous studies. RESULTS: A total of 1817 (911 boys, 906 girls) questionnaires were analysed. Adolescents said they seldom confided. The main quality they expected from a GP to whom they could confide in was 'honesty', which meant ensuring secrecy, refraining from judgment, and putting forward the right questions. This priority was modified by neither gender nor experience with health-risk behaviour. The quality of 'reliability' was more closely associated with their parents or friends, while 'emotionality' was cited less often. CONCLUSION: To gain the trust of adolescents, GPs have to be sincere and non-manipulative and have the ability to ensure confidentiality and to put forward the right questions without passing judgment. Can this be verified during consultations? Prospective studies could shed light on this point.[Box: see text].

[New forms of health care coordination in geriatrics]. / Nouvelles formes de coordination paramédicale en gériatrie.

The global care of elderly patients leads to new forms of coordination between allied healthcare professionals. They are based on completely new ethical issues relating to the responsibility of all the healthcare professionals involved. These new practices call for the mobilisation of new skills, the development of new teaching and research into interprofessional collaboration.