ABSTRACT
In this paper we describe the application of a non-radioactive DNA double labelling and staining method to an analysis of cell proliferation kinetics by flow cytometry, aimed at the direct measurement of recruitment rates in cell cultures. The method is based on the application of two halogenated deoxyuridines: iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) and chlorodeoxyuridine (CldUrd) which are incorporated into DNA synthesizing cells. By applying two commercially available monoclonal antibodies both deoxyuridines can be detected separately. To measure recruitment all proliferating cells in a plateau phase culture were labelled first with IdUrd applied during a time interval approximately equal to the cell cycle time. Subsequently, recruitment induced by a medium change was analysed by flow cytometric assessment of incorporation of CldUrd in cells which had not taken up IdUrd. Experiments designed to determine the toxicity of continuous labelling with IdUrd in different concentrations and of pulse labelling with CldUrd showed that there was no effect on the progression of cells through the cell cycle. The aim of this study is to test the sensitivity of the procedure to detect changes in proliferation kinetics, in particular the entrance of resting cells into the S phase. Although the cell culture model used is very simple, the results demonstrate clearly that a low rate of recruitment can be detected. It is suggested that the procedure described here is specific and sensitive enough to quantify changes in cell proliferation in tumours induced by various treatments and has advantages over other methods, which measure recruitment indirectly, or directly by using two radioactive thymidines.
Subject(s)
Cell Separation/methods , Deoxyuridine/analogs & derivatives , Flow Cytometry/methods , Idoxuridine , Staining and Labeling , Animals , Cell Cycle , Cell Division , DNA/biosynthesis , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Rats , Resting Phase, Cell Cycle , S Phase , Tumor Cells, CulturedABSTRACT
In this paper we describe an indirect fluorescence double staining procedure for the simultaneous detection of IdUrd and CldUrd in the same cell nucleus. Two commercially available antibodies were selected for this purpose. A rat anti-BrdUrd monoclonal antibody from Sera-lab was found to bind specifically to CldUrd and BrdUrd. A mouse monoclonal anti-BrdUrd antibody from Becton Dickinson used in a 1:2 dilution binds to all halogenated deoxyuridines but, when the cells were extensively washed with Tris buffer with a high salt concentration, almost no binding to CldUrd was observed. An immunofluorescence procedure was developed, based on these primary antibodies, raised in different species (rat and mouse), in combination with highly purified second antibodies: FITC conjugated goat antirat and Texas-Red conjugated goat antimouse.
Subject(s)
DNA/chemistry , Deoxyuridine/analogs & derivatives , Flow Cytometry/methods , Idoxuridine/analysis , Animals , Cells, Cultured , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , Deoxyuridine/analysis , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , MiceABSTRACT
This report describes the results of the comparison of three different methods and three monoclonal antibodies to stain cells in suspension for incorporated bromodeoxyuridine and total DNA content. The procedures were tested in three different experimental tumour cell lines. The sensitivity of the different procedures was expressed as the ratio of the anti-BrdUrd fluorescence intensities of the S and G1 phase cells (FS/FG1 ratio). There were remarkable differences in sensitivity between the different procedures. With the heat denaturation the most favourable FS/FG1 ratio's were obtained but substantial cell loss occurred during this procedure which is a disadvantage for clinical application. With the pepsin digestion + acid denaturation procedure cell loss was negligible. The standard acid denaturation procedure was inferior to the other two methods. Using the pepsin digestion + acid denaturation procedure we examined the variations in sensitivity for the different monoclonal antibodies and cell lines and the influence of BrdUrd concentration, labelingtime and cell concentration. The binding characteristics for the various antibodies differed considerably in our hands. Only with the IU4 antibody we obtained FS/FG1 ratio's comparable with those described in the literature. No difference was observed between the cell lines. Variation in cell concentration between 1 x 10(4) to 1 x 10(6) ml nor BrdUrd concentration appeared to influence the sensitivity of the procedure. A labelingtime of 1 h or even 30 min seems to be more than sufficient for an optimal FS/FG1 ratio. Our results indicate that using the appropriate antibody and immunofluorescence BrdUrd can be detected by flow cytometry, after incorporation into the DNA of tumour cells under a wide range of culture conditions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
