Bibliometric Analysis on Cholecystectomy Surgery in the Nursing Field.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to bibliometrically examine nursing publications regarding cholecystectomy surgery. DESIGN: The study is a bibliometric analysis. METHODS: The study was conducted in the Web of Science database. The keywords "cholecystectomy AND nursing" were used during the scanning. The data were evaluated in quantitative aspects. FINDINGS: In the study, 481 publications were identified, publications were made between 1987 and 2023, the average number of years since the release of the publication was 10.2, and the annual increase rate was 8.19%. The most active country was the United States, and the journal most often published in was the "Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing." In the last 3 years, the themes of "meta-analysis, complication, pain, anxiety, quality of life" have been trending, the most working and continuing to develop our "laparoscopic cholecystectomy" and "pain" themes, and the leading theme in the field was "anxiety". CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first bibliometric study examining nursing studies on cholecystectomy and provides a comprehensive overview of cholecystectomy and nursing issues over 36 years. In quantitative data, it was concluded that although studies in this field have a long history, the number of publications is low, and the annual growth rate is low. According to the quantitative evaluation results, it was found that the most studied topic in this field was laparoscopic cholecystectomy and pain, minimally invasive intervention and perioperative period topics remained isolated, and computerized tomography and gallbladder themes were among the newly emerging themes.

Factors Affecting Postoperative Pain Beliefs Among Surgical Patients in Türkiye: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: Frequency, ability to cope, and severity of pain; the genetic structure of the individual affects their emotional and cultural characteristics, beliefs, and personal characteristics. It is stated that pain beliefs are one of the factors affecting emotional pain control and approach to pain. AIMS: This study, it is aimed to determine the pain beliefs of individuals experiencing postoperative pain. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study. Surgical services of a single secondary care hospital. 170 patients who were in the first week after surgery, experienced acute pain, were between the ages of 18-65, and did not have a psychiatric disorder were evaluated. Collection Tools: Postoperative pain levels of the patients were evaluated with a Visual Analog Scale. As the VAS score increases, the pain level increases. Pain beliefs were evaluated with the Pain Beliefs Scale. Pain Beliefs Scale increases in the score obtained from the sub-score of the scale indicate that the pain beliefs related to that test are high. A student T-Test was used for bivariate comparisons between groups. One-way ANOVA was used to compare trivariate groups. In addition, Spearman's Correlation analysis was performed. Statistically, a confidence interval of >95% was used. The statistical significance level was set as p < 0.05. RESULTS: It was found that the pain levels of the patients participating in the study were low and the scores they received from the Pain Beliefs Scale subscales were moderate. It was determined that those with lower education levels had higher scale scores in the psychological beliefs sub-dimension of the Pain Beliefs Scale. In the organic beliefs sub-dimension, it was determined that those with lower income levels had higher organic beliefs. It was determined that the postoperative pain experienced did not affect pain beliefs (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that there was no relationship between the pain level and pain beliefs of patients with low pain in the postoperative period. Individuals experiencing postoperative pain believe that pain occurs due to the influence of both organic and psychological factors. For this reason, it is recommended factors that nurses who care for individuals experiencing postoperative pain provide care for both organic and psychological sources of pain.

The Effect of Preintervention Preparation on Pain and Anxiety Related to Peripheral Cannulation Procedures in Children.

This study was performed to determine the effect of several preintervention preparation practices on pain and anxiety related to the peripheral cannulation procedure in children ages 9-12 years. The study included 60 Turkish children (28 female, 32 male, randomly selected by lot), 30 of whom were included in the intervention group and 30 of whom were included in the control group. The children's demographic data were collected by a data collection form prepared by the researcher. The children in the intervention group read the training manual before peripheral cannulation, and the procedure was demonstrated on a teddy bear. Their level of pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale, and their level of anxiety was determined by the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children, before and during the procedure in both groups. Results showed that while anxiety and pain scores increased during the actual procedure compared to the preparatory procedure in the control group (anxiety t = -4.957, pain Z(a) = -4.048), anxiety and pain scores decreased during the actual procedure in the intervention group compared to the preparatory procedure (anxiety t = 7.896, pain t = 6.196). When the pain and anxiety scores were examined, it was found that both anxiety and pain scores in the intervention group were significantly lower than in the control group. In conclusion, children in this study experienced pain and situational anxiety during peripheral cannulation, and this pain can be reduced by preparing the child in advance of the procedure. It is suggested that children should be informed about and able to practice the procedure on a toy or model before peripheral cannulation. Preparation of the children to painful procedures in accordance with their cognitive development can reduce anxiety and pain.