Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29
Filter
2.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 37(12): 826-836, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31770071

ABSTRACT

Objective: This systematic review aimed to comprehensively review all available documents regarding photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) application in temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients and to suggest an evidence-based protocol for therapeutic PBM administration for these patients. Background data: The existence of temporomandibular joint and/or pain and dysfunction in masticatory muscles is characterized in TMDs. PBMT is, due to its impact on biological processes, especially inflammation, considered as an adjuvant treatment modality in TMD cases. Materials and methods: All original articles related to PBMT for TMDs in EMBASE, MEDLINE (NCBI PubMed and PMC), Cochrane library, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were reviewed until December 2018. Results: The energy density ranging from 0.75 to 112.5 J/cm2 with 0.9-500 mW power was found to be a window protocol for light application. The best results for pain relief and mandibular movement enhancement were reported after application of GaAlAs diode laser, 800-900 nm, 100-500 mW, and <10 J/cm2, twice a week for 30 days on trigger points. The session of light applications varied from 1 to 20. Conclusions: Although most articles showed that PBMT is effective in reducing pain and contributed to functional enhancement in TMD patients, the heterogenic parameters that have been reported in various studies made the standardization of PBMT complicated. However, such evidence-based consensus can be beneficial for both future research and for clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/therapy , Humans
3.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 37(12): 814-825, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31750798

ABSTRACT

Objective: This article presents a review of current data on the applications of photobiomodulation (PBM) in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS), to guide future research. Background data: Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) has been reported to be effective for various postoperative conditions, including pain relief, improvement of mastication, neurosensory recovery, and wound healing. There is a need for identifying the therapeutic irradiation windows for these conditions, based upon the available literature. Materials and methods: All original articles related to PBM for oral surgery in MEDLINE (NCBI PubMed and PMC), EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were reviewed until December 2018. Results: Forty-six clinical trials were included in this study. These trials were categorized into three different types of PBM applications. After reviewing all these studies, the most effective physical properties for PBM pain reduction after tooth extraction were as follows: wavelength 650-980 nm; power 4-300 mW; and energy density 3-85.7 J/cm2. PBMT at 660-910 nm with 4-500 mW power and 2-480 J/cm2 energy density was effective for decreasing facial swelling. At the same wavelength and power range with 4-106 J/cm2 energy density, PBM was effective for alleviating trismus after tooth extraction. Conclusions: Most papers suggested that PBM seemed to be effective in reducing pain, swelling, and trismus after third molar tooth extraction, neurosensory and nerve recovery after mandibular ramus osteotomy. The heterogeneity of the standardization regarding the parameters of laser calls for caution in interpretation of these results. However, this evidence-based review regarding the best protocols for OMFS applications can be beneficial for both future research and clinical applications.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Surgery, Oral , Humans
4.
Laser Ther ; 28(3): 193-198, 2019 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32009733

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dentin hypersensitivity is a frequent oral condition among patients suffering from gingival recession. Recent studies have suggested that photobiomodulation has the potential to reduce inflammation and relieve pain. The present study aims to assess the effectiveness of a new design of photobiomodulation toothbrush with specific irradiation parameters as a homecare device in treating dentin hypersensitivity and to compare its therapeutic effect with that of fluoride varnish. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with gingival recession and dentin hypersensitivity were selected and randomly assigned to three groups of equal size: fluoride varnish, photobiomodulation, and the combination. Dentin pain and hypersensitivity were measured using visual analog scale (VAS) by two distinct tests: the contact test with a periodontal probe and the air blast test on the areas of gingival recession and denuded root; once at baseline and again one month after the initial application of treatments. Laser irradiation was carried out at the wavelength of 660 nm in CW with an output power of 40 mW for 30 seconds per spot (1.2 J per spot, 6 J/cm2 energy density, and 200 mW/cm2 power density), perpendicularly to denuded root surfaces in non-contact mode. RESULTS: A significant reduction in dentin pain and hypersensitivity was observed in all three groups. However, the reduction was significantly greater in the combination group. CONCLUSION: At-home treatment of dentin hypersensitivity with photobiomodulation toothbrush is a convenient, safe, and effective method for the management of dentin hypersensitivity.

5.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 36(2): 59-60, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29227207
7.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 33(6): 343-4, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26067944
8.
Lasers Med Sci ; 30(2): 797-800, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24036971

ABSTRACT

The aim was to assess the significance of scaling and root planing (SRP) with adjunctive use of a water-cooled pulsed neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser for the treatment of periodontal inflammation. Thirty-nine patients were equally divided into three groups. In group 1, the upper jaw was treated with Nd:YAG laser application; whereas in groups 2 and 3, the upper jaw was treated with SRP alone and Nd:YAG laser application immediately after SRP, respectively. In each group, probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) were measured and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) volume was determined after using at 1 week and after 3 months. Three-month follow-up results showed that PPD, PI, GI, and GCF volume were significantly reduced in group 3 compared to groups 1 and 2. In short term, SRP with a single application of a water-cooled pulsed Nd:YAG laser reduced PI, GI, PPD, and GCF volume more significantly compared to when Nd:YAG laser and SRP are used alone to treat periodontal inflammation.


Subject(s)
Dental Scaling/methods , Inflammation/surgery , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Periodontal Pocket/surgery , Root Planing/methods , Adult , Aged , Dental Plaque Index , Female , Gingival Crevicular Fluid , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neodymium , Periodontal Index , Prospective Studies , Random Allocation , Water
9.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 32(6): 313-4, 2014 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24905926
10.
Cranio ; 32(1): 38-44, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24660645

ABSTRACT

AIMS: This study investigated the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) for the management of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) osteoarthritis. METHODOLOGY: In a double-blind clinical trial, 20 patients with TMJ osteoarthritis were randomly divided into laser and placebo groups. The patients in the laser group received irradiation from an 810 nm low-level laser (Peak power 80 W, average power 50 mW, 1500 Hz, 1 micro s pulse width, 120 seconds, 6 J, 3.4 J/cm(2) per point), which was applied on four points around the TMJs and on painful muscles three times a week for 4 weeks. In the placebo group, the treatment was the same as that in the laser group, but with laser simulation. The patients were evaluated before laser therapy (T1), after 6 (T2) and 12 (T3) laser applications and 1 month after the last application (T4), and the amount of mouth opening and the pain intensity were recorded. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in mouth opening either between the study groups or between the different evaluation times in each group (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in pain symptoms of the masticatory muscles and TMJ between the laser and the placebo groups (P>0.05), but some significant within-group improvements were present for Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores of the body of the masseter and TMJ in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: LLLT using the present laser parameters was no more effective than the placebo treatment for reducing pain and improving mouth opening in patients with TMJ osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Facial Pain/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Osteoarthritis/radiotherapy , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/radiotherapy , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Masticatory Muscles/physiopathology , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Range of Motion, Articular , Statistics, Nonparametric
11.
Lasers Med Sci ; 29(2): 551-7, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23318917

ABSTRACT

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been commonly used for the treatment of painful musculoskeletal conditions, but the results of previous studies on this subject are controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of LLLT in the management of patients with myogenic temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs). In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 20 patients with myogenic TMD were randomly divided into laser and placebo groups. In the laser group, a pulsed 810-nm low-level laser (average power 50 mW, peak power 80 W, 1,500 Hz, 120 s, 6 J, and 3.4 J/cm(2) per point) was used on painful muscles three times a week for 4 weeks. In the placebo group, the treatment was the same as that in the laser group, but without energy output. The patients were evaluated before laser therapy (T1), after six sessions of laser application (T2), at the end of treatment (T3), and 1 month after the last application (T4), and the level of pain and the amount of mouth opening were measured. There was a significant increase in mouth opening and a significant reduction of pain symptoms in the laser group (p < 0.05). A similar improvement was not observed in the placebo group (p > 0.05). Between-group comparisons revealed no significant difference in pain intensity and mouth opening measurement at any of the evaluation time points (p > 0.05). LLLT can produce a significant improvement in pain level and mouth opening in patients affected with myogenic TMD.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/radiotherapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
12.
Lasers Med Sci ; 29(4): 1517-29, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23584730

ABSTRACT

Recurrent herpes labialis is a worldwide life-long oral health problem that remains unsolved. It affects approximately one third of the world population and causes frequent pain and discomfort episodes, as well as social restriction due to its compromise of esthetic features. In addition, the available antiviral drugs have not been successful in completely eliminating the virus and its recurrence. Currently, different kinds of laser treatment and different protocols have been proposed for the management of recurrent herpes labialis. Therefore, the aim of the present article was to review the literature regarding the effects of laser irradiation on recurrent herpes labialis and to identify the indications and most successful clinical protocols. The literature was searched with the aim of identifying the effects on healing time, pain relief, duration of viral shedding, viral inactivation, and interval of recurrence. According to the literature, none of the laser treatment modalities is able to completely eliminate the virus and its recurrence. However, laser phototherapy appears to strongly decrease pain and the interval of recurrences without causing any side effects. Photodynamic therapy can be helpful in reducing viral titer in the vesicle phase, and high-power lasers may be useful to drain vesicles. The main advantages of the laser treatment appear to be the absence of side effects and drug interactions, which are especially helpful for older and immunocompromised patients. Although these results indicate a potential beneficial use for lasers in the management of recurrent herpes labialis, they are based on limited published clinical trials and case reports. The literature still lacks double-blind controlled clinical trials verifying these effects and such trials should be the focus of future research.


Subject(s)
Herpes Labialis/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Animals , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Herpes Labialis/drug therapy , Humans , Photochemotherapy , Photosensitizing Agents/therapeutic use , Recurrence
13.
ISRN Otolaryngol ; 2013: 839256, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24319598
14.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 30(3): 160-6, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22233558

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this split-mouth, double blinded, short-term, controlled clinical trial was to study the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for treatment of chronic periodontitis. BACKGROUND DATA: LLLT is reported to improve the outcome of traditional SRP, but the evidence is still weak. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with a probing pocket depth (PPD) of 4-6 mm involving at least three teeth in each quadrant were recruited for the study. Afterwards, SRP quadrants were randomly assigned for 10 sessions of LLLT. RESULTS: Results showed that when compared to sites treated with SRP alone, those treated with SRP+LLLT (10 sessions, 830 nm, 100 mW, 3 J per point, 3 J/cm(2)) exhibited greater reductions in PPD at 5 weeks and 3 months but not at 6 months. Further, SRP+LLLT-treated sites had a statistically significant increase in mean radiographic bone density when comparing 6- and 12-month data and overall from baseline to 12 months. There was a trend to reduce interleukin (IL)-1ß but the difference between control and laser sites was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: SRP combined with LLLT improved radiographic bone density and short-term PPD reduction in patients with chronic periodontitis, but did not significantly affect either the gingival crevicular fluid of IL-1ß or the gingival or plaque index.


Subject(s)
Chronic Periodontitis/radiotherapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Periodontal Index , Root Planing/methods , Adult , Bone Density , Chronic Periodontitis/diagnostic imaging , Chronic Periodontitis/therapy , Dental Plaque Index , Dental Scaling/methods , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Radiography , Reference Values , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
15.
Lasers Med Sci ; 27(3): 537-42, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21614480

ABSTRACT

Several studies suggest a biomodulatory influence of low-level laser irradiation in the inflammatory and reparative processes of dental tissues. The aim of this study was to investigate the stimulatory effect of 808-nm laser irradiation on root development of rat molars and also to evaluate the histological reaction of pulp and periapical tissues. Twenty-four 30-day-old Wistar male rats were randomly assigned to three-time and five-time laser therapy groups. After initial x-ray, using mammography equipment, laser energy was applied at a wavelength of 808 nm (2 J/cm(2), 100 mW, 20 s) to the midroot area of the lower molars of one side of mouth at repeated intervals of the 48 h. The animals were killed 1 day after the final treatment, and root length development of the experimental samples was compared to contra-lateral non-irradiated molars using mammography. The histological reaction of the pulp and periapical tissue was evaluated under light microscopy. Root development was more advanced in irradiated groups than in the non-irradiated controls (p < 0.001). No significant differences, however, could be found between the root development changes in the three-time and five-time laser therapy groups (p > 0.05). Histological findings showed that the occurrence of secondary cement formation was significantly higher in the irradiation groups compared to the controls (p = 0.003). However, there were no statistically significant differences for the frequencies of pulp hyperemia, periodontal ligament fiber organization, or lamina dura remodeling between the groups (p > 0.05). Under the conditions used in this study, 808-nm low-level laser accelerates the rat molar root development in the presence of favorable histological reactions.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Molar/radiation effects , Tooth Root/radiation effects , Animals , Dental Pulp/radiation effects , Male , Models, Animal , Molar/diagnostic imaging , Odontogenesis/radiation effects , Periapical Tissue/radiation effects , Radiography , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Tooth Root/diagnostic imaging , Tooth Root/growth & development
17.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 30(1): 37-40, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22047597

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this work was to study the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the healing and relapse intervals in patients with recurrent labial herpes simplex infections. BACKGROUND DATA: Several pharmaceuticals are available to reduce symptoms and improbé healing of labial herpes, but only LLLT has been reported to significantly influence the length of the recurrence period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In an initial study, 232 patients with herpes simplex type 1 virus symptoms were consecutively selected for either LLLT or conventional therapy, including acyclovir cream or tablets. One of the dentists was responsible for the diagnosis, a second dentist for the treatment, and and a third for the evaluation, to allow for a semi-blinded procedure. Patients in the laser group received 670-nm laser irradiation, 40 mW, 1.6 J, 2.04 J/cm(2), 51 mW/cm(2) per blister in the prodromal stage and 4.8 J in the crust and secondarily infected stages, plus 1.2 J at the C2-C3 vertebrae. Patients were monitored daily during the first week to control healing, and monthly for 1 year to check on recurrence. In a consecutive study, 322 patients receiving LLLT were followed during 5 years to observe the period of ocurrences. RESULTS: An obvious effect of LLLT was found for both initial healing and for the length of the recurrence periods. CONCLUSIONS: LLLTof herpes simples virus 1 (HSV-1) appears to be an effective treatment modality without any observed side effects.


Subject(s)
Herpes Labialis/radiotherapy , Herpesvirus 1, Human , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Herpes Labialis/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Recurrence , Young Adult
18.
Support Care Cancer ; 19(8): 1069-77, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21660670

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to review the effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in the prevention and treatment of cancer therapy-induced oral mucositis (OM). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials of LLLT performed during chemotherapy or radiation therapy in head and neck cancer patients. RESULTS: We found 11 randomised placebo-controlled trials with a total of 415 patients; methodological quality was acceptable at 4.10 (SD ± 0.74) on the 5-point Jadad scale. The relative risk (RR) for developing OM was significantly (p = 0.02) reduced after LLLT compared with placebo LLLT (RR = 2.03 (95% CI, 1.11 to 3.69)). This preventive effect of LLLT improved to RR = 2.72 (95% CI, 1.98 to 3.74) when only trials with adequate doses above 1 J were included. For treatment of OM ulcers, the number of days with OM grade 2 or worse was significantly reduced after LLLT to 4.38 (95% CI, 3.35 to 5.40) days less than placebo LLLT. Oral mucositis severity was also reduced after LLLT with a standardised mean difference of 1.33 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.98) over placebo LLLT. All studies registered possible side-effects, but they were not significantly different from placebo LLLT. CONCLUSIONS: There is consistent evidence from small high-quality studies that red and infrared LLLT can partly prevent development of cancer therapy-induced OM. LLLT also significantly reduced pain, severity and duration of symptoms in patients with cancer therapy-induced OM.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/complications , Low-Level Light Therapy/instrumentation , Stomatitis/radiotherapy , Confidence Intervals , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Risk , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics as Topic , Stomatitis/etiology
19.
Int Wound J ; 8(4): 413-8, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21496209

ABSTRACT

Radiotherapy produces both acute and delayed effects on mucosal tissues, disturbing their healing. This report shows a successful treatment with laser phototherapy (LPT) on a delayed wound healing in oral mucosa previously submitted to radiotherapy with a follow up of 3 years. A 47-year-old patient treated 6 months earlier for tongue squamous cell carcinoma by surgery and radiotherapy presented with a mass in the operated area. Biopsy showed chronic inflammatory infiltrate around a residual polyglactin suture. After 2 months there was a painful mucosal dehiscence on the biopsy site. LPT was performed using a semiconductor laser with 660-nm wavelength (InGaAlP) and spot size of 0·04 cm(2) . The parameters applied were 40 mW, 4 Jcm(2) /point, 0·16 J/point, 2·4 J/session. The irradiation was performed punctually, through contact mode in 15 points (4 seconds/point), on top of and around the lesion, during ten sessions. The wound healed completely after ten sessions. This treatment proved to be conservative and effective, inducing healing of a chronic wound in a tissue previously submitted to radiotherapy.


Subject(s)
Cranial Irradiation/adverse effects , Lasers, Semiconductor/therapeutic use , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Mouth Mucosa/radiation effects , Oral Ulcer/radiotherapy , Radiation Injuries/radiotherapy , Wound Healing/radiation effects , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth Mucosa/pathology , Oral Ulcer/etiology , Oral Ulcer/pathology , Radiation Injuries/pathology , Time Factors , Tongue Neoplasms/diagnosis , Tongue Neoplasms/radiotherapy
20.
Photomed Laser Surg ; 29(1): 67-9, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20973736

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) is a life-threatening dermatosis characterized by epidermal sloughing and stomatitis. We report the case of a 7-year-old boy in whom laser phototherapy (LPT) was highly effective in reversing the effects of an initial episode of SJS that had apparently developed in association with treatment with phenobarbital for a seizure disorder. The patient was first seen in the intensive care unit (ICU) of our institution with fever, cutaneous lesions on his extremities, trunk, face, and neck; mucosal involvement of his genitalia and eyes (conjunctivitis); ulcerative intraoral lesions; and swollen, crusted, and bleeding lips. He reported severe pain at the sites of his intraoral and skin lesions and was unable to eat, speak, swallow, or open his mouth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trying to prevent and minimize secondary infections, gastric problems, pain, and other complications, the patient was given clindamycin, ranitidine, dipyrone, diphenhydramine (Benadryl) drops, and morphine. In addition, he was instructed to use bicarbonate solution and Ketoconazole (Xylogel) in the oral cavity. Because of the lack of progress of the patient, the LPT was selected. RESULTS: At 5 days after the initial session of LPT, the patient was able to eat gelatin, and on the following day, the number and severity of his intraoral lesions and his labial crusting and swelling had diminished. By 6 days after his initial session of LPT, most of the patient's intraoral lesions had disappeared, and the few that remained were painless; the patient was able to eat solid food by himself and was removed from the ICU. Ten sessions of LPT were conducted in the hospital. The patient underwent three further and consecutive sessions at the School of Dentistry, when complete healing of his oral lesions was observed. CONCLUSION: The outcome in this case suggests that LPT may be a new adjuvant modality for SJS complications.


Subject(s)
Low-Level Light Therapy , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/radiotherapy , Child , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...