Prevalence and Correlates of Antipsychotic Medication Use in Oregon Assisted Living.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate how assisted living and residential care (AL/RC) and memory care (MC) contexts are associated with the 90-day prevalence of antipsychotic medication use (APU), considered a quality measure in long-term care. DESIGN: All licensed AL/RC settings in Oregon received an annual mailed questionnaire to provide aggregate resident demographics, health acuity, health service use, payment type, and organizational policies. Organizational measures were collected from state websites. METHODS: Random intercepts regression models were estimated to assess organizational and resident population characteristics associated with 90-day APU prevalence over 3 study waves (2017-2019). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We examine 932 observations in 463 AL/RC settings from 2017 to 2019 (137 settings participated in all 3 waves, 195 in 2 waves, and 131 in 1 wave). RESULTS: The average 90-day APU prevalence in 464 Oregon AL/RC settings is 30.7%, although rates differ by MC endorsement (23.9% in AL/RC and 42.7% in MC). Nonprofit settings were associated with lower rates of APU in both AL/RC [ß = -4.4 (percentage points), 95% CI -8.4, -0.4] and MC (ß = -12.4, 95% CI -21.2, -3.6). Compared with low-Medicaid settings, settings with very high proportions of Medicaid residents were associated with higher APU prevalence, +8.9 in AL/RC (95% CI 1.7, 16.1) and +11.0 percentage points in MC (95% CI 2.3, 19.8). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: APU prevalence in MC settings and with high-Medicaid populations is considerably higher than non-MC and lower-Medicaid settings. Federal policies guide APU in nursing homes but not AL/RC. No national database of AL/RC exists; thus, state-based studies can inform the discussion of state policy and practice development. Additional study is needed to contextualize the relationships between AL/RC population-level practices and characteristics and the APU prevalence to inform policy and practice development related to this measure as a quality indicator.

Family Involvement among Oregon Adult Foster Home Residents, 2018-2023.

OBJECTIVES: To track the changes that occurred in family involvement among Oregon Adult Foster Home (AFH) residents following the COVID-19 pandemic and to examine the associations between home and resident characteristics and family involvement. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of repeated cross-sectional data. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2027 responses from AFH providers that replied to a mailed questionnaire from a sample of eligible licensed Oregon AFH selected to participate annually between 2018 and 2023 (6 waves). METHODS: AFH providers filled out a questionnaire containing questions about family involvement (residents who received 6 types of support from family members or friends, such as help with personal care or social visit) and resident characteristics (activities of daily living needs, payer mix, age, gender, dementia status). Additional contextual data (size, rural/urban) were obtained from state agencies. Associations among family involvement and home and resident characteristics were examined using multivariable linear regression models. RESULTS: Bivariate analyses showed statistically significant declines in social visits and outings and help getting to medical appointments during the first 2 years (2021 and 2022) of the COVID-19 pandemic, but little change in help with personal care or taking medications or phone calls. By 2023, social visits had recovered to pre-pandemic levels but remained significantly lower for help getting to medical appointments and going on outings. Multiple regression models that included controls showed that rural AFH and those with higher Medicaid use reported significantly lower family involvement in social visits, outings, and help getting to medical appointments. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The continued decline in assistance for medical appointments and outings portends potential challenges in resident socioemotional well-being and accessing health care services in this setting. Understanding the long-term impacts of the pandemic on quality of life and quality of care for residents living in community-based care settings may require a multifaceted approach to measuring family involvement.

The Resident VIEW in Community-Based Care Residential Settings.

The Resident VIEW is a measure of person-centered care (PCC) from residents' perspectives and was previously studied in nursing homes. The current study presents descriptive data for the Resident VIEW in community-based care settings including assisted living, residential care (AL/RC), and adult foster homes (AFH). Using a two-stage sampling design, we recruited 31 AL/RC and 119 AFH in Oregon and completed face-to-face structured interviews with 227 and 195 residents, respectively. Residents provided ratings for both the importance of and their experience with 66 items that tapped into PCC practices in eight domains. Results are provided for each item, many of which are significantly associated with greater quality of life, better resident satisfaction, and fewer depressive symptoms, especially in the domains of personalized care and being treated like a person. Incongruence between importance and experience ratings indicate many residents experience unmet needs across multiple domains. The Resident VIEW performed well in different types of settings, providing an important tool for researchers and providers who wish to learn about the PCC experience from residents' points of view.

Rapid adoption of electronic health record and health information exchange among assisted living communities, 2010-2018.

Adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and health information exchange (HIE) is a key tool to improving the quality of care in assisted living communities (ALC). We examined whether EHRs were being used in ALC to support HIE in 2010 and 2018. We found that adoption of EHR and HIE functions increased substantially over the study period. However, adoption of HIE functions lagged significantly behind EHR functions in both 2010 and 2018 and was accompanied by growing disparities in the adoption of EHR functions among smaller, nonchain, and for-profit communities. To improve the quality of care for this important and growing population, targeted policies are needed to support the adoption of both EHR and HIE functions in ALC.

Survey Deficiencies as Quality Indicators in Oregon Assisted Living Communities.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: License inspection data have commonly been used as a quality measure for nursing homes but have not yet been used to assess the quality of assisted living/residential care (AL/RC) communities. Drawing on resource dependency theory, we test the hypothesis that structural and environmental characteristics influence AL/RC quality as measured by deficiency citations ("deficiencies") issued during license inspections. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from 526 licensed AL/RC communities in Oregon that received a license inspection visit between 2008 and 2016, we examined the prevalence of deficiencies by type and year. We estimated regression models to identify structural and environmental characteristics associated with the number of deficiencies. RESULTS: Most (79%) inspections resulted in at least one deficiency. The most common deficiencies concerned medications and treatments (57%), change of condition and monitoring (48%), and resident health services (45%). Structural characteristics associated with higher odds of receiving one or more deficiencies included larger size, memory care designation, shorter administrative tenure, and for-profit status. Environmental characteristics associated with higher odds of receiving one or more deficiencies included rural location, lower unemployment, and market concentration. The number and likelihood of a given community receiving a deficiency decreased over time. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Resource dependency theory constitutes a useful framework to consider the role of structural and environmental factors that affect AL/RC quality, including resident needs, institutional knowledge, resource availability, and market pressure. License inspection data are a viable option for assessing the quality of AL/RC communities.

"What Keeps Me Awake at Night": Assisted Living Administrator Responses to COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Assisted living (AL) constitutes an important sector of residential long-term care, yet there has been limited research about the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in this setting. This qualitative study sought to understand the impact of the early stages of the pandemic (February-August 2020) from AL administrators' perspectives. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Semistructured phone interviews were conducted with 40 AL administrators in Oregon. A stratified sampling method emphasizing rurality, profit status, Medicaid acceptance, and memory care designation was used to maximize variation in perspectives. We asked 8 questions aimed at understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their roles and AL residents and their families, as well as AL operations, such as staffing and resource procurement. Audio-recorded interviews were transcribed and analyzed using an iterative thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified 3 themes that characterize AL administrators' response to COVID-19: emotion and burnout management, information management, and crisis management. Based on their experiences, administrators made suggestions for managing future crises. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our findings demonstrate the slow-burning but devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in AL communities similar to recent findings in nursing homes. Coupled with the limited resources, perceived external pressures, and the ongoing pandemic, many administrators were managing but not thriving in these domains. AL as a care setting, and the role of administrators, requires more scholarly and policy attention, especially regarding emergency preparedness and response.

Person-centered care practices in nursing homes: Staff perceptions and the organizational environment.

Person-centered care (PCC) is considered the standard to assure quality of care and quality of life in long-term care, benefiting both residents and staff. This study examines the associations between nursing home staff perceptions of person-centered care practices, the organizational system, and work-related attitudes in a sample of 340 nurses and direct care workers across 32 nursing homes in Oregon. Random-intercepts regression models were used to estimate within- and between-nursing home variation in staff perceptions of PCC practices as measured by the Staff Assessment of Person-Directed Care (SA-PDC), and identify characteristics associated with these perceptions. Staff in nursing homes that accept Medicaid reported lower SA-PDC scores, and higher scores were reported in nonprofit nursing homes. Staff perceptions varied extensively within nursing homes, suggesting a lack of staff cohesion regarding core aspects of PCC. Cultivating a supportive work environment is key to promoting person-centered care practices, increasing job satisfaction, elevating affective commitment, and reducing turnover intention.

Cognition-Enhancing, Antipsychotic, and Opioid Medication Use Among Assisted Living and Residential Care Residents in Oregon.

OBJECTIVES: Explore community- and resident-level characteristics associated with polypharmacy and use of cognition-enhancing, antipsychotic, and opioid medications among a statewide representative sample of assisted living and residential care (AL/RC) residents. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, descriptive. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1135 AL/RC residents living in 387 licensed communities in Oregon were recruited. One-third of residents lived in communities certified to provide memory care to residents with dementia. METHODS: All licensed AL/RC communities received a mail survey with questions about 3 randomly selected residents' demographic, health service use, health conditions, medication use, and payment information. We estimated bivariate and multiple logistic regression models, resulting in unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios of resident- and community-level characteristics associated with each medication use indicator. RESULTS: One in 5 residents took a cognition-enhancing medication (20%) in the prior 7 days. Just more than one-fifth (22%) and one-quarter (25%) of residents took opioid or antipsychotic medications, on a scheduled or as-needed basis in the prior 7 days, respectively. Residents with Alzheimer's disease or related dementia (ADRD) living in rural communities were half as likely to take cognitive-enhancing medications compared with their urban counterparts. When controlling for all resident and community covariates, residents with ADRD were almost 3 times as likely to receive an antipsychotic and half as likely to receive an opioid compared to residents without an ADRD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Understanding variation in the use of medications associated with behavioral expressions of ADRD in AL/RC residents is a crucial clinical and policy area.

Revisiting the Role of Physicians in Assisted Living and Residential Care Settings.

As the United States population ages, a higher share of adults is likely to use long-term services and supports. This change increases physicians' need for information about assisted living and residential care (AL/RC) settings, which provide supportive care and housing to older adults. Unlike skilled nursing facilities, states regulate AL/RC settings through varying licensure requirements enforced by state agencies, resulting in differences in the availability of medical and nursing services. Where some settings provide limited skilled nursing care, in others, residents rely on resident care coordinators, or their own physicians to oversee chronic conditions, medications, and treatments. The following narrative review describes key processes of care where physicians may interact with AL/RC operators, staff, and residents, including care planning, managing Alzheimer's disease and related conditions, medication management, and end-of-life planning. Communication and collaboration between physicians and AL/RC operators are a crucial component of care management.

Correlates of Administrator Tenure in US Residential Care Communities.

OBJECTIVE: To determine community- and individual-level correlates of administrator tenure in US residential care communities (RCCs). DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of the 2010 National Survey of Residential Care Facilities designed by the National Center for Health Statistics. Analysis was conducted using Tobit regression. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative sample of RCCs in the United States (n = 2302). MEASURES: The outcome measure for this study is RCC administrator tenure. Residential care community characteristics include chain ownership, size, occupancy rate, profit status, years of operation, if the building was purposely constructed as an RCC, Medicaid census, presence of a dementia care unit, and whether administrative staff provided care. Administrator characteristics included age, gender, race/ethnicity, and level of education. RESULTS: Over a quarter of administrators in this sample remained employed with the same RCC for 10 or more years (28%). Chain membership, community size, and presence of a dementia care unit are associated with shorter administrator tenure (P < .001). Communities with greater than 80% occupancy, administrator's age 40+, and Hispanic race/ethnicity were associated with longer administrator tenure (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Various community and administrator characteristics are associated with shorter or longer tenure within the same community. More setting-specific research is needed to identify how RCC administrators influence care quality and what different lengths of tenure indicate in the context of RCC operations.

The Resident VIEW in Nursing Homes.

This article presents the Resident VIEW (Voicing Importance, Experience, and Well-Being), a measure designed to learn directly from long-term care residents the extent to which they experience support that matters most to them. The Resident VIEW contains 63 items across eight domains developed through cognitive interviews with residents in different types of residential settings (e.g., nursing homes, assisted living, and adult foster care). Residents rate items on both importance and their experience. In total, 258 nursing home residents living in 32 Oregon nursing homes were selected through a two-stage random sampling design and participated in the study. Results demonstrate that what matters most to residents varies, emphasizing the value of asking residents directly about their preferences. The relationship between importance and experience differed by item. Residents who experienced support rated very important within some domains, reported better quality of life and reported lower levels of depressive symptoms than those who did not experience these things. The interaction between importance and experience, however, did not reach statistical significance, suggesting that positive experiences may provide benefit even in some areas that are not perceived as important by residents. Results underscore the value of incorporating the resident perspective into measure development in long-term care.