Thrombus remodelling by reversible and irreversible P2Y12 inhibitors.

Pharmacological inhibition of the platelet ADP-receptor P2Y12 is a cornerstone in the prevention of atherothrombotic events in adult patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Thienopyridines such as clopidogrel and prasugrel exert their antithrombotic effect by means of active metabolites that irreversibly inhibit P2Y12. Due to the short half-life of these metabolites, a subpopulation of ADP-responsive platelets will form in between dosing. With increased platelet turnover rate or poor patient compliance, the fraction of ADP-responsive platelets will increase, potentially increasing the risk for new thrombotic events. In contrast, the reversible P2Y12 inhibition produced by direct-acting ADP blockers such as ticagrelor and cangrelor inhibit the entire platelet population. In this study, we evaluated the impact of these pharmacological differences on thrombus formation in an ex vivo flow chamber model. A customized image analysis pipeline was used for automatized, large-scale identification and tracking of single platelets incorporated into the thrombus, enabling quantitative analysis of the relative contribution of inhibited and uninhibited platelets to thrombus growth and consolidation. Comparative experiments were conducted using the irreversible and reversible P2Y12 inhibitors prasugrel active metabolite (PAM) and ticagrelor, respectively. Our results show that PAM inhibited thrombus platelet recruitment more gradually than ticagrelor, with a slower onset of inhibition. Further, we show that the presence of a small fraction (<10%) of uninhibited platelets did not abrogate the antithrombotic effect of PAM to any significant extent. Finally, we demonstrate a gradual enrichment of inhibited platelets in the thrombus shell due to selective recruitment of inhibited platelets to the thrombus periphery.

Effects of Heparin and Bivalirudin on Thrombin-Induced Platelet Activation: Differential Modulation of PAR Signaling Drives Divergent Prothrombotic Responses.

Heparin and bivalirudin are widely used as anticoagulants in the setting of acute thrombosis. In this study, we investigated how these drugs affect the ability of thrombin to generate a prothrombotic platelet response via activation of the protease-activated receptors (PARs) 1 and 4. We examined the effects of heparin/antithrombin and bivalirudin on PAR1- and PAR4-mediated intracellular calcium mobilization, aggregation, α-granule release, and procoagulant membrane exposure in platelets exposed to thrombin concentrations likely to be encountered in the thrombus microenvironment during thrombosis. At physiological antithrombin levels, heparin treatment resulted in complete and sustained inhibition of thrombin-induced PAR4-mediated platelet activation, but transient PAR1 signaling was sufficient to elicit significant α-granule release and platelet aggregation. In contrast, bivalirudin treatment resulted in rapid and profound inhibition of signaling from both PAR receptors, followed by a delayed phase of PAR4-mediated platelet activation, resulting in a robust prothrombotic response. Combination treatment with bivalirudin and subtherapeutic concentrations of heparin completely inhibited the residual platelet activation observed with single drug treatment at all time-points. Our results show that heparin and bivalirudin have different and complementary inhibitory effects on the activation of PAR1 and PAR4 by thrombin.

Quantification of Platelet Contractile Movements during Thrombus Formation.

Imaging methods based on time-lapse microscopy are important tools for studying the dynamic events that shape thrombus formation upon vascular injury. However, there is a lack of methods to translate the vast amount of visual data generated in such experiments into quantitative variables describing platelet movements that can be subjected to systematic analysis. In this study, we developed experimental and computational protocols allowing for a detailed mathematical analysis of platelet movements within a developing thrombus. We used a flow chamber-based model of thrombosis wherein a collagen strip was used to initiate platelet adhesion and activation. Combining the use of a platelet staining protocol, designed to enable identification of individual platelets, and image processing, we tracked the movements of a large number of individual platelets during thrombus formation and consolidation. These data were then processed to generate aggregate measures describing the heterogeneous movements of platelets in different areas of the thrombus and at different time points. Applying this model and its potential, to a comparative analysis on a panel of platelet inhibitors, we found that total platelet intra-thrombus movements are only slightly reduced by blocking the interactions between glycoproteins IIb/IIIa and Ib and their ligands or by inhibiting thromboxane synthesis or P2Y12 signalling. In contrast, whereas 30 to 40% of the platelets movements (for the CD42a-labelled platelets) and 20% (for the pro-coagulant platelets), within a thrombus, are contractile, i.e., towards the centre of the thrombus, this contractile component is almost totally abolished in the presence of agents inhibiting these pathways.