Return to work as a measure of outcome in adults hospitalized for acute burn treatment.

Rehabilitation of patients with burn injuries is receiving renewed interest because survival has improved, and health reform has mandated outcomes assessment. To determine factors affecting return to work, a survey was conducted among 234 employed patients treated from 1986 through 1993. The mean burn size was 13.3% total body surface area. Patients returned to work in a mean of 14.3 weeks; a number initially returned to light-duty or part-time jobs as a "bridge" to full-time employment. Length of hospitalization, number of surgeries, total and full-thickness burn size, and subjective assessments by patients of their functional ability correlated with time off work. Patients with health insurance were more likely to resume work than was expected, whereas those covered by Medicaid and those involved in injury-related lawsuits were less likely to return to work. It is hoped that this information can be used to design interventions aimed at improving this outcome of burn treatment.

Self-inflicted patient burns: suicide versus mutilation.

Though suicide by burning is well-described, little information is available regarding patients who mutilate themselves by burning without suicidal intent. We reviewed 31 patients admitted from 1980 to 1991 with self-inflicted burns to describe differences between self-mutilation and attempted suicide (AS). In 16 patients who had mutilated themselves, mean burn size was 1.6% TBSA (range 0.3% to 9.0% TBSA) compared with 35.4% TBSA in the 15 patients who had attempted suicide (range 11.5% to 90% TBSA; p < 0.0001). Twelve of 15 patients who had attempted suicide used flammable liquids for self-immolation, whereas patients who had mutilated themselves often used techniques that they could control, including scalding, chemicals, and contact injuries. Most patients in both groups and previous histories of psychiatric disorders. Self-mutilators had a high incidence of personality disorders (56%), whereas the AS group more frequently suffered from depression (47%). Nine (56%) patients who had mutilated themselves had previous self-inflicted burns, compared with only one patient in the AS group. Mean lengths of stay, number of surgeries, and hospital and physician charges were higher for the AS group. Case examples of both types of injuries are presented. Burn care professionals should be familiar with syndrome of self-mutilation by burning. Patients often present with puzzling injuries and require psychiatric treatment in addition to burn care.

Enhancing clinical nursing research: a vital role for staff development educators.

Staff development educators can play a vital role in clinical nursing research. To accomplish this, they must first broaden their role concept to include research facilitation. Second, they must utilize resourceful means to facilitate the research learning process. This article outlines essential steps to guide the staff development educator in enhancing research efforts of staff nurses.

A quality improvement focus for patient rights: advance directives.

This article highlights the implementation and evaluation phases of specific mechanisms developed in a university hospital setting to comply with the Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) of 1991. The article describes the program within the context of a continuous quality improvement cycle beginning with a philosophy about patient involvement in health care decision making. The article takes the reader through each phase of the process, culminating in the development of a revised quality improvement plan.

Multiple organ failure in patients with thermal injury.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and significance of multiple organ failure in patients with burn injuries. DESIGN: Retrospective review and prospective assessment of patients with acute burns. SETTING: University hospital burn center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed 529 patients admitted for acute burn treatment whose lengths of stay exceeded 72 hrs. A new scoring system, the Thermal Injury Organ Failure Score, was used to assign scores from 0 (normal) to 6 (severe dysfunction) to each of 6 organ systems, which were then totaled to compile the overall score. This system was also used for prospective assessment of 83 adult burn patients, and compared with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scoring system during the first week of treatment. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For 496 survivors, mean organ failure score was 3.28, compared with 23.1 in 33 nonsurvivors (p < .0001). All nonsurvivors but one had scores of > or = 15, indicating dysfunction of at least three organs. Scores and mortality rate increased with age and burn size. Pulmonary dysfunction was the most frequent form of organ failure seen, but correlated less with outcome than did cardiovascular or neurologic scores. Sepsis was present in 22 of 33 patients who died. In the prospective study, organ failure scores correlated with outcome more closely than did APACHE II scores. Weekly evaluation of these patients demonstrated progressive divergence in scores between survivors and nonsurvivors. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple organ failure was almost invariably present in burn patients who died > 72 hrs after injury. Burn victims, who have been excluded from reviews of multiple organ failure, appear to manifest organ failure in a manner similar to that of other surgical populations. The scoring system reported here may prove useful in evaluating organ failure in thermally injured patients.