ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To assess drug-related problems (DRPs) documented by specially trained community pharmacists during the Finnish comprehensive medication review (CMR) procedure and to describe the resulting interventions for home-dwelling and assisted-living primary care patients 65 years or older. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of applicable written CMR case reports for primary care patients 65 years or older by 26 community pharmacists attending a 1.5-year CMR accreditation training (174 patients recruited; 121 included in the analysis). The main outcome measures were DRPs and physicians' acceptance of pharmacists' recommendations. RESULTS: The pharmacists reported a total of 785 DRPs (average of 6.5/patient). DRPs were more common among home-dwelling patients (7.2) than those in the assisted-living setting (5.5; P = 0.014) but were similar in nature. Inappropriate drug choices were the most common DRPs (17% of DRPs), involving most often hypnotics and sedatives. Also, indications with no treatment were common (16%), particularly those associated with cardiovascular diseases and osteoporosis. Pharmacists made 649 recommendations, 55% (n = 360) of which were accepted by physicians without revision. In 51% of DRPs (n = 403), CMRs resulted in change of drug therapy; stopping a drug was the most common change. CONCLUSION: Specially trained pharmacists were able to identify DRPs among elderly primary care patients by using a CMR procedure, and more than one-half of the identified DRPs led to medication changes. The pharmacists' special knowledge of geriatric pharmacotherapy and access to clinical patient data were crucial for recognizing DRPs.
Subject(s)
Assisted Living Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Community Pharmacy Services/organization & administration , Community Pharmacy Services/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Patient Care Planning/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
This commentary describes the development and evidence-base of the Comprehensive Medication Review (CMR) procedure for community and hospital settings in Finland. The development was coordinated by a national steering group. The group collaborated with 26 experienced pharmacists who developed and tested CMR procedures during a 1.5 year accreditation training for CMR. The development consisted of: (1) a literature review and inventory of medication review procedures in different countries; (2) the creation of potential procedures and related documentation; (3) integration of potential procedures into a national standard procedure; and (4) piloting the standard procedure in practice settings. The resulting comprehensive medication review procedure requires access to a patient's clinical information, an in-home patient interview and a case conference with the collaborating physician. This procedure covers the four main dimensions critical for safe and appropriate geriatric pharmacotherapy: aging and safety; co-morbidities; polypharmacy; and adherence. The CMR measures and documentation build on these dimensions.
Subject(s)
Cooperative Behavior , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Medication Reconciliation/methods , Program Development , Finland , Humans , PharmacistsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To implement a long-term continuing education course for pharmacy practitioners to acquire competency in and accreditation for conducting collaborative comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs). DESIGN: A 1(1/2)- year curriculum for practicing pharmacists that combined distance learning (using e-learning tools) and face-to-face learning was created. The training consisted of 5 modules: (1) Multidisciplinary Collaboration; (2) Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacotherapy; (3) Rational Pharmacotherapy; (4) CMR Tools; and (5) Optional Studies. ASSESSMENT: The curriculum and participants' learning were evaluated using essays and learning diaries. At the end of the course, students submitted portfolios and completed an Internet-based survey instrument. Almost all respondents (92%) indicated their educational needs had been met by the course and 68% indicated they would conduct CMRs in their practice. The most important factors facilitating learning were working with peers and in small groups. Factors preventing learning were mostly related to time constraints. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive medication review competencies were established by a 1(1/2)- year continuing education curriculum that combined different teaching methods and experiential learning. Peer support was greatly appreciated as a facilitator of learning by course participants.
