Plasma nitrite/nitrate levels in women with postmenopausal hot flushes.

AIM: To study a possible association between the potent vasodilatory nitric oxide and postmenopausal hot flushes. METHODS: We compared the release of nitric oxide in 150 recently menopausal women reporting no (n = 23), mild (n = 34), moderate (n = 30), or severe (n = 63) hot flushes. Plasma samples, collected after a 48-h arginine-poor diet, were assessed for the metabolites of nitric oxide (NOx), using the Griess reaction. RESULTS: Levels of NOx showed no association with the severity of hot flushes. Furthermore, no relationships with individual hot flushes and serum levels of estradiol or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were detected. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data indicate that nitric oxide appears not to be a factor in hot flushes and might not be related to their etiology. Since a fasting plasma NOx measurement may not reflect what happens at the time of the hot flush episode, in future studies there should be an attempt to assess nitric oxide release during a concomitant hot flush.

Hot flushes and biochemical markers for cardiovascular disease: a randomized trial on hormone therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Menopausal hot flushes may affect the responses of various vascular risk factors to hormone therapy (HT). We compared the responses of biochemical markers for cardiovascular diseases to HT in recently postmenopausal women with tolerable or intolerable hot flushes. METHODS: Healthy, non-smoking freshly postmenopausal women (n = 150) with no previous HT use were studied. Seventy-two women reported intolerable hot flushes (> or =7 moderate/severe episodes/day) and 78 women tolerable hot flushes (< or =3 mild episodes/day). The participants were treated in randomized order with either transdermal estradiol gel (1 mg), oral estradiol valerate (2 mg) with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate (5 mg), or placebo for 6 months. Treatment-induced changes in lipids, lipoproteins, apolipoproteins, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were compared. The trial is registered in the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Research Registry (no. NCT00668603). RESULTS: Pretreatment hot flush status was not related to the responses of these markers to different forms of HT. However, when all active regimens were evaluated together as a post-hoc analysis, 7/10 markers showed a tendency toward greater beneficial changes in women with intolerable hot flushes. Furthermore, in women with intolerable hot flushes and with HT use, the increases in SHBG (Spearman's rho = - 0.570, p < 0.001) were related to the reductions in hot flushes during the use of HT. CONCLUSIONS: Hot flushes appear to be no significant determinant for the responses of vascular markers to HT use.