Enhancing hypertension pharmacotherapeutics education by integrating social determinants of health.

OBJECTIVE: Social determinants of health (SDOHs) play a significant role in hypertension management. Pharmacy program accreditation standards include that students should understand SDOHs. However, there are limited data regarding approaches to incorporating SDOHs within pharmacotherapeutics courses. This study evaluated the changes in student knowledge, understanding, perceptions, beliefs, and confidence by integrating SDOH topics in hypertension pharmacotherapeutics lectures. METHODS: The study invited students enrolled in cardiovascular pharmacotherapeutics courses at 2 institutions to participate. Participation involved a preintervention questionnaire, a lecture on clinical management of hypertension incorporating SDOH concepts, an assignment involving reading a journal article and answering related questions, and a postintervention questionnaire. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS, with a predetermined α level of 0.05 for statistical significance. Mean composite questionnaire scores were calculated and compared with Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Of 109 students, the response rate was 85.3 % (93 participants). The combined questionnaire results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in all questionnaire item composites. The open-ended knowledge assessment yielded a mean score of 5.75 (range 3-6). CONCLUSION: The study intervention enhanced student knowledge, understanding, perceptions, beliefs, and confidence regarding the impact of SDOHs on hypertension. This practical and reproducible approach offers a valuable method for incorporating SDOH concepts into pharmacotherapeutics courses.

Evolution of a Continuing Professional Development Program Based on a Community of Practice Model for Health Care Professionals in Resource-Limited Settings.

INTRODUCTION: The Baylor International Pediatric AIDS Initiative (BIPAI) Network supports a network of independent nongovernmental organizations providing health care for children and families in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Using a community of practice (CoP) framework, a continuing professional development (CPD) program was created for health professionals to enhance knowledge and exchange best practices. METHODS: An online learning platform (Moodle), videoconferencing (Zoom), instant messaging systems (Whatsapp), and email listserv facilitated learning and interaction between program participants. Target participants initially included pharmacy staff and expanded to include other health professionals. Learning modules included asynchronous assignments and review of materials, live discussion sessions, and module pretests and posttests. Evaluation included participants' activities, changes in knowledge, and assignment completion. Participants provided feedback on program quality via surveys and interviews. RESULTS: Five of 11 participants in Year 1 earned a certificate of completion, and 17 of 45 participants earned a certificate in Year 2. Most modules showed an increase in module pretest and posttest scores. Ninety-seven percent of participants indicated that the relevance and usefulness of modules were good or outstanding. Ongoing evaluation indicated changes in Year 2 for program improvement, and notable outcomes indicated how CoP added value in developing a true community. DISCUSSION: Using a CoP framework allowed participants to improve their personal knowledge and become part of a learning community and network of interdisciplinary health care professionals. Lessons learned included expanding program evaluation to capture potential value creation of the community of practice in addition to individual-level development; providing briefer, more focused programs to better serve busy working professionals; and optimizing use of technological platforms to improve participant engagement.

Baseline Assessment of Systemic Racism Education in Pharmacy Curricula.

Objective. To determine, by survey, the inclusion of systemic racism education in US Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curricula and identify barriers and facilitators to addressing this content.Methods. A survey was developed and distributed to curricular representatives at US colleges and schools of pharmacy. The survey assessed inclusion of systemic racism education in curricula, faculty involvement in teaching systemic racism content, barriers to adding systemic racism content in curricula, and future curricular plans. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for institutional background information, curricular content, and barriers to inclusion. Relationships between the inclusion of systemic racism content at public versus private programs were examined, and associations between traditional and accelerated programs were assessed.Results. Fifty-eight colleges and schools of pharmacy provided usable responses. Of the respondents, 84% indicated that teaching systemic racism content and its impact on health and health care was a low priority. For 24% of respondents, systemic racism content was not currently included in their curriculum, while 34% indicated that systemic racism content was included in one or more courses or modules but was not a focus. Despite systemic racism content being offered in any didactic year, it was rarely included in experiential curricula. Top barriers to inclusion were lack of faculty knowledge and comfort with content and limited curricular space. No significant differences were found between program types.Conclusion. Based on the current level of systemic racism education and barriers to inclusion, faculty need training and resources to teach systemic racism concepts within pharmacy curricula. The inclusion of systemic racism concepts and guidance in the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education's Accreditation Standards could help to drive meaningful change and promote health equity.