Real-world effectiveness of IDegLira compared with intensified conventional insulin therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: IDegLira is a fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide with proven efficacy against simpler regimens and non-inferiority against basal-bolus insulin therapy. However, the evaluation of its real-world effectiveness is hindered by technical issues and requires further exploration. Thus we aimed to compare effectiveness of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus intensified conventional insulin therapy (ICT) for type 2 diabetes in a real-world setting. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study from an outpatient clinic in Hungary included people who initiated IDegLira due to inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c > 7.0% [53.0 mmol/mol]) with oral and/or injectable antidiabetic drugs. Data were compared with a historical cohort who initiated ICT. Outcomes included HbA1c, body weight, and hypoglycaemia differences over 18 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Data were included from 227 and 72 people who initiated IDegLira and ICT, respectively. Estimated mean difference (MD) in HbA1c at 18 months favoured IDegLira versus ICT (MD 0.60, 95% CI 0.88-0.32 [MD 6.6 mmol/mol, 95% CI 9.6-3.5]). More people reached target HbA1c ≤7.0% (53.0 mmol/mol) with IDegLira than ICT (odds ratio 3.36, 95% CI 1.52-7.42). IDegLira treatment was associated with weight loss compared with gain for ICT (MD 6.7 kg, 95% CI 5.0-8.5). The hazard ratio for hypoglycaemia comparing IDegLira with ICT was 0.18 (95% CI 0.08-0.49). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with IDegLira over 18 months resulted in greater HbA1c reductions, weight loss versus gain, and a lower rate of hypoglycaemia versus ICT in people with type 2 diabetes.

[Etanercept-induced subacute thyroiditis. Case report and literature review]. / Etanercept okozta szubakut pajzsmirigygyulladás.

65 years old male patient received 4 mg/day methylprednisolone baseline therapy and 50 mg/week etanercept treatment for 5 years due to rheumatoid arthritis. The patient experienced pain in neck, and developed weakness, fever and dysphagia. He had normal blood count but accelerated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (88 mm/hour), elevated CRP (49.3 mg/l) and hyperthyroidism (TSH 0.006 mIU/l, fT4 27.22 pmol/l, fT3 5.61 pmol/l). The autoimmune origin could be excluded because of normal values of antibodies against thyreoidea peroxidase and TSH receptor. The ultrasound investigation showed focal hypoechogenic structure and low vascularisation. Based on the laboratory and ultrasound results as well as clinical signs etanercept related subacute thyroiditis was supposed. As part of the treatment we interrupted the etanercept treatment and gave 16 mg methylprednisolone for 5 days, then 8 mg for 7 days, after that the patient received the daily 4 mg of methylprednisolone as baseline therapy. After rapid improvement the symptoms got worse again so we repeated the administration of methylprednisolone treatment with a higher dose (16 mg/day for 5 days then 8 mg/day for two months). Thyroid functions and the inflammatory markers got normalized. We conclude the necessity of monitoring the thyroid function during etanercept treatment thus avoiding this rare but serious side effect. Orv Hetil. 2017; 158(39): 1550-1554.