Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Clin Ter ; 170(1): e89-e98, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31916427

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular tumor in the adult population. It can affect any part of the uveal tract: the iris, ciliary body, and choroid. Historically, enucleation has been the mainstay of treatment for primary melanoma. In the last decade, however, radiotherapy has acquired an increasingly important role and has now become our first-line modality. However, it is still widely debated what is the most effective radiotherapy technique for this tumor. Purpose to perform a literature review on the utility of radiotherapy for primary ocular melanoma and determine the most effective radiotherapy technique Materials and Methods: We included all systematic and narrative reviews on the topic, published between September 2007 and November 2017 on PubMed and SCOPUS. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility criteria for each article using the PRISMA checklist. The methodological quality of narrative and systematic reviews was evaluated with the INSA and AMSTAR checklists, respectively Results: Our study analyzed a total of 23 studies, including 18 narrative reviews and 5 systematic reviews. Radiotherapy with Brachytherapy, Proton Therapy, SRS/SRT with gamma knife and cyber knife, are the most common choices for the treatment of primary ocular melanoma. These techniques allow for excellent lesion spread control, eye, and vision conservation, and improve overall patients' quality of life. Among the narrative reviews, the highest INSA score was 5/7, the lowest 2/7, the mean was 3.83/7 and median was 4/7. Among the systematic reviews, the highest AMSTAR score was 9/12, the lowest 4/12, the mean 5.6/7 and median 4/7 Conclusion: The number of studies available on this topic is scarce. Among those published, the methodological quality is modest, as assessed with the INSA and AMSTAR checklists. As a result, we are not able to determine what the most effective radiotherapy technique is


Subject(s)
Eye Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Procedures and Techniques Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Uveal Diseases/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Clin Ter ; 170(1): e11-e14, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31850478

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A commonly recognized complication of intravitreal steroids is ocular hypertension (OHT).The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy in controlling this side effect, even in patients receiving sequential injections. METHODS: A total of 146 injections were performed on 78 patients over 3 years. 78 eyes were treated with 1 injection, 44 eyes were treated with 2 injections; 24 eyes were treated with 3 injections. The intravitreal corticosteroid used in this observational study is 0.7mg dexamethasone, commercially known as 0.7mg Ozurdex®. RESULTS: Following the first injection, mean intraocular pressure (IOP) increased by 1,90 mmHg. Following the second injection, mean IOP increased by 0.23 mmHg. Following the third injection, there was no statistically significant change. Patients with IOP >= 21mmHg (7% of all participants) were started on topical pressure-lowering medications. CONCLUSIONS: Intravitreal dexamethasone implants increased IOP of variable degrees in different patients. However, secondary OHT was effectively controlled with pharmacotherapy alone. This allowed for continuation of dexamethasone therapy.


Subject(s)
Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Intraocular Pressure/drug effects , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Ocular Hypertension/chemically induced , Ocular Hypertension/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Ter ; 170(1): e87-e88, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31850490
4.
Clin Ter ; 168(5): e340-e343, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29044359

ABSTRACT

Si prevede che la malattia diabetica con tutte le sue complicanze avrà un forte aumento di incidenza con un grosso impatto socioeconomico nei prossimi decenni in tutto il mondo. Pertanto ben si comprende l'importanza di individuare attraverso una fine diagnostica quanto più precocemente la comparsa dei sintomi diabetici, migliorare lo stile di vita ed impostare cure efficienti. Riportiamo la serie di raccomandazioni EURETINA 2017, dei maggiori esperti in Europa per la gestione della malattia diabetica e delle complicanze della retina. Per combattere questa "pestilenza" occorre un team medico preparato. Il trattamento laser è stato considerato sino a non molto tempo fa il Gold standard della retinopatia diabetica e dell'edema diabetico (RD e EMD). Recenti studi hanno dimostrato, invece, che si possono raggiungere risultati migliori mediante l'iniezione diretta di farmaci nella cavità vitreale. In particolare è emerso terapia di prima linea, molecole in grado di inibire il fattore di crescita endoteliale vascolare (anti VEGF) mentre non è più raccomandata la fotocoagulazione laser per il trattamento del DME. Nell'ambito delle molecole farmacologiche gli steroidi hanno mantenuto un ruolo nella gestione del DME cronicamente persistente.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy/therapy , Macular Edema/therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/pathology , Female , Humans , Male
5.
Clin Ter ; 164(2): e121-6, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23698213

ABSTRACT

AIM: This observational study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-vitreal injections of pegaptanib during a 12-month follow-up period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty eyes (20 patients) affected by diabetic macular edema were monitored. Twenty were subjected to treatment, and 20 were controls. The treatment involved a cycle of three intravitreal injections of pegaptanib (0.3 mg every 6 weeks), at the end of which treated patients were submitted to a monthly follow-up for a period of 12 months. The aim was to evaluate the clinical condition of the eye after therapy and gauge the efficacy of the long-term use of this drug. Specific criteria were used to measure the efficacy and safety of pegaptanib. Regarding efficacy, we considered the following: an average improvement in the power of vision, or visual acuity, of →10 letters (2 lines), equivalent to an average logMAR score of →0.2, and a reduction in the central macular thickness of →250 µm. Regarding safety, we considered the occurrence of undesired eye and systemic side effects correlated to either the drug itself or the injection procedure. RESULTS: The logMAR score for the measurement of visual acuity at T3 (third intra-vitreal injection at week 13) with respect to T0 decreased from 0.7 ± 0.277 to 0.445 ± 0.216, suggesting an improvement, while the mean Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score increased from 25.75 ± 13.046 to 34.300 ± 11.770 letters. The central macular thickness was reduced from the initial value of 746.95 ± 293.601 to 334.050 ± 93.997 µm. In seven controls, we registered a worsening both in terms of visual acuity and macular thickness in some eyes, justifying a continuation of therapy in eight eyes of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Pegaptanib proved to be efficacious and safe for the treatment of diabetic macular edema throughout the 12-month followup. To evaluate its long-term efficacy, further studies are required with larger numbers of patients and longer observational follow-up periods.


Subject(s)
Aptamers, Nucleotide/administration & dosage , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aptamers, Nucleotide/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
6.
Clin Ter ; 163(5): e269-77, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23099973

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate with criticism the available evidence shown in the literature about the efficacy of pneumotrabeculoplasty (PNT) as a treatment for primary open angle glaucoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PNT is a recent non-surgical and noninvasive technique to safely reduce the intraocular pressure (IOP) in eyes suffering from ocular hypertension or primary open angle glaucoma. The technique consists in the application on the ocular surface of a disposable suction ring that induces a temporary trabecular meshwork stretching, increasing outflow of aqueous humor in the Schlemm's canal. In our study, we compared the results on the efficacy and safety of this treatment published to date in the literature. RESULTS: During follow-up, Authors have observed significant reductions in IOP in about 70% of treated eyes. The first treatment consists in 3 applications at day 0, 7 and 90, repeatable every 90 days. Immediately after suction ring application there is a significant elevation of IOP, however, of short duration and without demonstrable visual field worsening. Side effects observed are of little clinical significance and spontaneously resolving in a short time. CONCLUSIONS: The PNT is a safe and effective technique to reduce IOP in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. It is repeatable, but can not replace drug treatment in patients already receiving topical therapy for glaucoma; however, it has proven effectiveness in maintaining an IOP target over time if accompanied with only a single topical drug, favoring a reduction of antiglaucoma drugs in polytherapy and increasing the compliance with treatment.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/surgery , Trabeculectomy/methods , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Humans , Intraocular Pressure
7.
Ann Ig ; 24(4): 319-24, 2012.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22913175

ABSTRACT

The Authors report three cases of ophthalmic neurosyphilis in patients who complained a visual decrease monocular. The diagnosis was performed with physical and fundus examination, electrophysiological, hemato-chemical and microbiological tests, fluorangiografy and RMN. The physical examination provided standard results about eyes interested while the fundus examination, as well as the electrofunctional and fuorangiografy examinations, showed some alterations. The sockets and encephalon RMN were normal. Moreover; the patients were submitted to specific haematic and microbiological laboratory tests which showed positivity for syphilis. To sum up all patients received an incidental diagnosis of syphilis. This trend could be attributable to an extensive use of antibiotics that changing the natural course of disease, mask clinical evidences and make them harder to diagnose.


Subject(s)
Eye Infections, Bacterial/epidemiology , Neurosyphilis/epidemiology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male
8.
Clin Ter ; 163(1): 19-22, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22362228

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: A double-blind placebo-controlled study on 68 patients suffering by Diabetic Retinopathy was aimed in order to evaluate the effectiveness of Mesoglycan in this pathology. This drug is particularly interested in treatment of disorders of microcirculation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The two treatments were randomly assigned to each patient, using a 100 mg/day dosage of Mesoglycan, and both treatments were prescribed for 6 months. The efficacy of both treatments was based on clinical and instrumental check. RESULTS: The clinical results that emerged in the group treated with Mesoglycan were excellent, although observations are on a limited number of patients appears a direct action of Mesoglycan on the endothelium retinal blood vessels and circulation. Indeed, in the observed patients, was detected a significant reduction of microhemorrhages, microaneurysms and exudates. The same cannot be said of the placebo group; none of patients of that group showed signs of clinical improvement at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Data emerging from our study show a direct action of Mesoglycan on endothelium retinal blood vessels and circulation, as we observed in patients we found a significant reduction in the number of microhemorrhages, microaneurysms and exudates. This action can be explained by the characteristics of drug as antithrombotic profibrinolytic and anti-edema, already found in vitro and experimentally. We conclude that our preliminary study showed an encouraging clinical efficacy, together with excellent tolerability, and therefore our objective has been met, which was to verify the existence of the prerequisites for a larger clinical study.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Glycosaminoglycans/therapeutic use , Aged , Aneurysm/blood , Aneurysm/drug therapy , Aneurysm/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Diabetic Retinopathy/blood , Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Glycosaminoglycans/pharmacology , Humans , Male , Microcirculation/drug effects , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Retinal Hemorrhage/blood , Retinal Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Retinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity
9.
Clin Ter ; 163(6): e413-22, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23306756

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To determine the effectiveness and safety of treatment of intravitreal Ranibizumab for Central Retinal Vein Occlusion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This non-randomized observational clinical study was comprised of a round of therapy with three IVI. Twenty eyes affected by CRVO were recruited. The average age was 65.06 +/- 15 years and criterion for inclusion: age >18 years, best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) from 5 to 40 letters and macular edema with thickness greater than 275 micrometer. The criteria used for reinjection were: CMT> 150 micrometer, ETDRS <10 letters and LogMAR <0.2. The statistical analysis for continuous variables (ETDRS, logMar and CMT) was conducted calculating median and range (min-max), since these variables, due to sample size, were not normally distributed.Time trends of these variables were plotted with boxplot and differences. Events between T0 and T12 were assessed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measurements and the F test (Pillai's trace). The statistical significance was set at p <=0.05. RESULTS: All of the patients showed improvement. In fact, the ETDRS went from a median of 20.00 to 28.50, LogMAR went from a median of 0.75 to 0.55 and the values for CMT went from a median of 556.00 micrometer to 390.00 micrometer. The drug reaches maximum effectiveness after two months of therapy, with T2 remaining constant from the third injection at T3 until the end of 12 months at T12. CONCLUSIONS: The results produced by our study indicate that Ranibizumab is a valid treatment for CRVO.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Retinal Vein Occlusion/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Ranibizumab , Retinal Vein Occlusion/complications , Time Factors
10.
Clin Ter ; 163(6): e423-8, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23306757

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of biofeedback treatment for low-vision rehabilitation in patients affected by macular disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 171 eyes of 99 patients (42 female and 57 male) between 50 to 75 years old (mean age: 64.6) were included in this study. All patients were suffering from age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (122 eyes) or macular myopic degeneration (MMD) (49 eyes). All patients underwent an assessment of examinations including visual acuity, reading speed test, slit lamp examination and tonometry, ophthalmoscopic fundus examination, microperimetry, fixation test, retinal sensitivity, fluorangiography (FAG), optical coherence tomography (OCT). The treatment was divided in 16 sessions, the patients underwent other examination assessment at 6 and 12 months, except for FAG and OCT. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test, and p-value <=0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: After training 130 eyes of 171 in the study group (76.02%) had a statistically significant improvement of the distant visual acuity (p<0.01): 38 eyes suffering from MMD and 92 eyes suffering from AMD. After 12 months of follow-up a group of 25 eyes of 130 (19.23%) had a loss of benefits that were observed at the end of the treatment sessions: 16 eyes and 9 eyes were suffering from MMD and AMD respectively. Examination assessment during follow-up showed that 4 eyes and 2 eyes of the group that lost benefits had a worsening of MMD and AMD primary disease respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It is not yet understood how biofeedback produces amelioration of visual function. According to the 'Eccentric fixation' theory, with biofeedback rehabilitation patients are trained to use the non-damaged retina areas to develop a new preferred retinal locus. In our study group we found a significant improvement in both visual acuity and fixation.


Subject(s)
Macular Degeneration/complications , Myopia, Degenerative/complications , Vision, Low/etiology , Vision, Low/rehabilitation , Aged , Biofeedback, Psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
11.
Clin Ter ; 153(1): 61-4, 2002.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11963637

ABSTRACT

In evolution of hypertension's treatment it may no be sufficient to lower blood pressure to achieve beneficial effects in long term outcomes. Several goals of antihypertensive treatment remain unrealized. There is so great interest for new drugs that may protect target organs and improve outcomes. The angiotensin II, the major effector of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, causes a variety of potentially noxious cardiovascular effects which are specially mediated by AT1 subtype receptors. AT1 receptor blockers (losartan, candesartan, irbesartan, valsartan) are available drugs in the angiotensin-II-antagonist class. This paper examine the peculiar features of this new class of drugs.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Hypertension/drug therapy , Valine/analogs & derivatives , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Biphenyl Compounds/therapeutic use , Humans , Irbesartan , Losartan/therapeutic use , Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 1 , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use , Valine/therapeutic use , Valsartan
12.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 4(3): 59-66, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11558626

ABSTRACT

Thrombomodulin is a glycoprotein that can bind to thrombin and activate protein C, thus mitigating the effects of cytokines produced by inflammatory and immunological processes. The molecule exerts a protective function on endothelial cells. Thrombomodulin is cleaved to its soluble form by neutrophil elastase and by other substances produced during acute and chronic inflammatory responses, immunologic reactions and complement activation. ELISA technique yields normal serum levels of 3.1 +/- 1.3 ng/ml; in males these levels are higher; TM levels also rise during menopause. Other circumstances associated with an increase of serum TM levels are smoking, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), cardiac surgery, atherosclerosis, ARDS, liver cirrhosis, diabetes mellitus, cerebral and myocardial infarction, and multiple sclerosis. Serum levels of TM represent an useful prognostic index, because they are associated with an increase in mortality rate, or however a progression of the underlying pathological condition.


Subject(s)
Thrombomodulin/blood , Biomarkers , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...