Pressure-Controlled Intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion: A Novel Approach to Improve Microvascular Flow and Reduce Infarct Size in STEMI.

Despite successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), myocardial salvage is frequently suboptimal resulting in large infarctions with increased rates of heart failure and death. Microvascular dysfunction after the procedure is frequently present and contributes directly to poor outcomes in STEMI. Pressure-controlled intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PiCSO) is a novel technology designed to mitigate microvascular dysfunction in STEMI. Non-randomized studies have suggested that PiCSO use during primary PCI in STEMI is safe, improves microvascular perfusion and reduces infarct size. Randomized trials are ongoing to investigate the safety and effectiveness of PiCSO in high-risk patients with anterior STEMI undergoing primary PCI.

Angiographic classification of patterns of restenosis following femoropopliteal artery intervention: A proposed scoring system.

OBJECTIVES: To propose a classification system for characterizing angiographic femoropopliteal artery restenosis patterns associated with common endovascular modalities. BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease is a worldwide issue affecting millions of people. Despite a myriad of endovascular technologies available to treat peripheral artery disease of the femoropopliteal arteries, restenosis remains a common failure mode. Characterizing common patterns of restenosis is important to discern the potential impact of baseline patient, lesion, and procedural characteristics, as well as treatment modalities on either the primary success or the failure patterns associated with restenosis. METHODS: Studies included in the analysis were from previous core laboratory-adjudicated femoropopliteal artery disease trials and registries reflecting a wide array of treatment modalities. RESULTS: From the subjects enrolled and analyzed, there were 403 total angiograms for analysis and adjudication. Target lesion revascularization images of the 32 validation cases were evaluated for index treated length, diameter stenosis, and lesion morphology characteristics. The following lesion types are proposed: Type 1 "Focal" pattern, which may be "Edge Proximal" or "Edge Distal" depending on location; a Type 2 "Multifocal" pattern which may also exhibit edge restenosis, but may also be "Edge Bilateral"; a Type 3 "Moderate" pattern and a Type 4 "Diffuse" pattern; and finally, a Type 5 "Occlusion". CONCLUSIONS: A classification system that enables healthcare professionals to anticipate and describe failures following the index procedure, thereby impacting the choice of options for retreatment, may facilitate consistency and standardization within the heterogeneous field of endovascular device treatments for the femoropopliteal artery.

Stenting for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction is associated with less neointimal hyperplasia in the pooled IVUS analysis from HORIZONS-AMI and the TAXUS IV and V and ATLAS workhorse, long lesion, and direct stent studies.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the difference in neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), stable angina pectoris (SAP), and unstable angina pectoris (UAP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From formal core laboratory intravascular ultrasound substudies, we compared NIH after paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) or bare metal stents (BMS) in STEMI lesions from HORIZONS-AMI trial with SAP and UAP lesions from TAXUS IV, V, and ATLAS studies. RESULTS: At follow-up, %NIH at the minimum lumen area (MLA) site was less in STEMI (n=212) than in UAP (n=233) and SAP (n=440) lesions treated with PES (19.6 vs. 26.2 vs. 25.0%, P=0.002; all intravascular ultrasound data shown as least-square means in abstract) and less in STEMI (n=66) than in UAP (n=72) and SAP (n=143) lesions treated with BMS (34.0 vs. 26.7 vs. 45.5%, P=0.0003). As a result, MLA at follow-up was larger in STEMI than in UAP and SAP lesions treated with PES (5.9 vs. 5.2 vs. 5.0 mm, P<0.0001) or treated with BMS (5.1 vs. 4.3 vs. 4.0 mm, P=0.002). Net volume obstruction ([NIH/stent volume]×100) at follow-up was significantly less in STEMI than in UAP and SAP lesions treated with PES (7.8 vs. 13.4 vs. 13.4%, P<0.0001) or BMS (20.6 vs. 28.5 vs. 32.1%, P<0.0001). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed that STEMI was correlated independently and inversely with net volume obstruction compared with SAP (regression coefficient -6.99, P<0.0001) or UAP (regression coefficient -6.29, P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Implantation of PES or BMS in STEMI compared with UAP and SAP was associated with less NIH.

A provisional strategy for treating true bifurcation lesions employing a scoring balloon for the side branch: final results of the AGILITY trial.

BACKGROUND: The provisional approach for bifurcation stenting with side-branch balloon angioplasty is associated with dissections and suboptimal results requiring kissing balloon techniques or bailout stenting. We hypothesized that using a scoring balloon for the side branch and a drug-eluting stent for the main vessel might improve outcomes of true bifurcation lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 93 patients with complex bifurcations were enrolled in a multicenter, single-arm, prospective clinical trial. A drug-eluting stent was deployed in the main vessel following dilatation of the side-branch stenosis with a scoring balloon. The overall angiographic success rate was 93.5%, and procedural success rate was 91.4%. The final diameter stenosis was 13.9% ± 7.2% for the main vessel and 33.3% ± 22.9% for the side branch. Crossover to stent deployment in the side branch was required in 10.8%. The postscoring balloon dissection rate was 8.2% and 6% (all ≤ class C) for the main vessel and side branch respectively, which was reduced to 1.1 and 2.1% poststenting. At 9-month follow-up, the composite MACE rate [cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization (TLR)] was 5.4%, including a TLR rate of 3.3% (1.1% from hospital discharge to 9 months). CONCLUSION: The 9-month results of the AGILITY trial support a simple provisional strategy for treating complex true bifurcation lesions with deployment of a drug-eluting stent in the main vessel after dilatation of the side-branch vessel with a scoring balloon. This strategy was associated with excellent and safe procedural results, a low rate of crossover to side-branch stenting, and favorable outcomes.

Economic modeling of new stent platforms to evaluate cost effectiveness: analysis of the TAXUS Liberté versus TAXUS express stents.

BACKGROUND: With the changing health care environment, cost effectiveness is an important adjunct to clinical investigation when assessing new medical devices. This study presents an economic model to evaluate cost effectiveness of coronary stents. METHODS: Markov modeling was developed comparing total costs (Medicare payer perspective) between TAXUS Liberté and TAXUS Express based on 3-year clinical outcomes from the TAXUS ATLAS Small Vessel and Long Lesion trials. RESULTS: The TAXUS Liberté 2.25-mm stent provided cost savings relative to TAXUS Express from a payer perspective ($17,605 vs. $20,281), driven by reduced target vessel revascularization (0.16 events/patient vs. 0.33 events/patient). In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, TAXUS Liberté was less costly with fewer major adverse cardiac events in over 99% of parameter sets. The TAXUS Liberté Long (38 mm) stent was cost neutral relative to TAXUS Express from a payer perspective ($18,545 vs. $18,551) with fewer myocardial infarctions and cardiac deaths. Accounting for angiography-driven revascularizations, TAXUS Liberté 2.25 mm still provided cost savings relative to TAXUS Express ($16,822 vs. $19,139), although TAXUS Liberté Long was more expensive than TAXUS Express ($17,886 vs. $17,652). From a hospital perspective, TAXUS Liberté Long provided cost savings up to a price premium of $671/stent, driven by fewer stents employed per patient. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms the utility of economic modeling in assessing new stent platforms. TAXUS Liberté 2.25 mm is economically dominant relative to TAXUS Express when treating small vessels. TAXUS Liberté Long is cost neutral to modestly more costly than TAXUS Express 2.25 mm from a payer perspective.

Impact of drug-eluting stents on distal vessels.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have not addressed vessel response >5 mm distal to the stent edge. Therefore, we investigated the impact of paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) versus bare metal stents (BMS) on distal vessels in the serial intravascular ultrasound substudies of TAXUS IV, V, and VI. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS IV, V, and VI were double-blind, randomized, multicenter, controlled trials comparing PES with BMS. In their intravascular ultrasound substudies, 103 patients (54 BMS, 49 PES) had intravascular ultrasound data ≥10 mm distal to the stent both postprocedure and at 9 months follow-up. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Multilevel modeling was used to account for the variation between patients and within patients among distal segments. Effect of stent type, time, and their interaction was tested using a mixed effect model controlling for distal segments. Postprocedure lumen and vessel were not significantly different between PES versus BMS; however, lumen (P=0.006) and vessel (P=0.0001) were significantly reduced for BMS at 9-month follow-up but not for PES. Conversely, there was a significant plaque increase from postprocedure to 9-month follow-up for PES (P=0.0008) but not for BMS. These vessel responses were statistically consistent among 0- to 5-mm versus 5- to 10-mm versus 10- to 15-mm segments distal to the stent in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: PES use was associated with plaque increase from baseline to 9-month follow-up >5 mm distal to the stent along with positive remodeling, whereas BMS use was associated with negative remodeling and no plaque increase. These vessel responses were consistent in 5-mm long subsegments: 0 to 5 mm versus 5 to 10 mm versus 10 to 15 mm distal to the stent. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: HTTP://WWW.CLINICALTRIAL.GOV. Unique identifiers: TAXUS IV: NCT00292474; TAXUS V: NCT00301522; TAXUS VI: NCT00297804.

Propensity-matched patient-level comparison of the TAXUS Liberté and TAXUS element (ION) paclitaxel-eluting stents.

Stent design, metal alloy composition, and strut thickness may influence late lumen loss and clinical outcomes after bare metal stent deployment; however, their impact on outcomes after drug-eluting stent deployment is unknown. Although the TAXUS Liberté and ION paclitaxel-eluting stents use similar polymer and drug, the ION stent incorporates a novel thin-strut platinum chromium metal alloy and cell design. We therefore compared patient-level data from 2,298 subjects enrolled into the TAXUS ATLAS (TAXUS Liberté) and PERSEUS (ION) clinical trials. Propensity-score (1:1) matching was performed to adjust for covariate imbalance between stent types. Twelve-month major adverse cardiac events were less frequent after use of the ION compared to the TAXUS Liberté (12.7% vs 8.3%, p <0.001, unadjusted; 12.0% vs 7.5%, p = 0.007, propensity matched) largely because of decreased non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI; 2.9% vs 1.4%, p = 0.01, unadjusted; 3.2% vs 0.9%, p = 0.004, propensity matched). The MI difference was predominantly periprocedural and in patients treated with a single stent. In conclusion, this exploratory post hoc analysis demonstrated that the ION was associated with fewer adverse clinical events than the TAXUS Liberté because of decreased non-Q-wave MI. Stent platform-related variables may influence clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent use despite similar polymer and drug elution. Differences in adjunctive pharmacotherapy and/or stenting technique may also be contributory.

Late-term clinical outcomes with zotarolimus- and sirolimus-eluting stents. 5-year follow-up of the ENDEAVOR III (A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions).

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare late safety and efficacy outcomes following percutaneous coronary revascularization with zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) and sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). BACKGROUND: Despite higher late lumen loss and binary restenosis with ZES compared with SES, it is uncertain whether differences in early angiographic measures translate into more disparate late clinical events. METHODS: Clinical outcomes were prospectively evaluated through 5 years in the ENDEAVOR III (A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Medtronic Endeavor Drug [ABT-578] Eluting Coronary Stent System Versus the Cypher Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent System in De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions) that randomized 436 patients of relatively low anatomic and clinical risk to treatment with ZES (n = 323) or SES (n = 113) and evaluated a primary endpoint of 8-month angiographic late lumen loss. RESULTS: At 5 years (completeness of follow-up: 95.2%), pre-specified endpoints of all-cause mortality (5.2% vs. 13.0%, p = 0.02), myocardial infarction (1.0% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.03), and the composite event rates of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (1.3% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.009) and major adverse cardiac events (14.0% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.05) were significantly lower among patients treated with ZES. Rates of target lesion (8.1% ZES vs. 6.5% SES, p = 0.68) and target vessel revascularization were similar between treatment groups. Stent thrombosis was infrequent and similar in both groups (0.7% ZES vs. 0.9% SES, p = 1.0). Between 9 months and 5 years, progression of major adverse cardiac events was significantly more common with SES than with ZES (16.7% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Despite initially higher angiographic late lumen loss, rates of clinical restenosis beyond the protocol-specified angiographic follow-up period remain stable with ZES compared with the rates for SES, resulting in similar late-term efficacy. Over 5 years, significant differences in death, myocardial infarction, and composite endpoints favored treatment with ZES. (The Medtronic Endeavor III Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System Clinical Trial [ENDEAVOR III]; NCT00217256).

The Integrity bare-metal stent made by continuous sinusoid technology.

The Integrity Coronary Stent System (Medtronic Vascular, CA, USA) is a low-profile, open-cell, cobalt-chromium-alloy advanced bare-metal iteration of the well-known Driver/Micro-Driver Coronary Stent System (Medtronic Vascular). The Integrity stent is made with a process called continuous sinusoid technology. This process allows stent construction via wrapping a single thin strand of wire around a mandrel in a sinusoid configuration, with laser fusion of adjacent crowns. The wire-forming process and fusion pattern provide the stent with a continuous preferential bending plane, intended to allow easier access to, and smoother tracking within, distal and tortuous vessels while radial strength is maintained. Continuous sinusoid technology represents innovation in the design of stent platforms and will provide a future stent platform for newer technology, including drug-eluting stent platforms, drug-filled stents and core wire stents.

Long-term benefit of the TAXUS Liberté stent in small vessels and long lesions. TAXUS ATLAS program.

BACKGROUND: The long-term impact of treating de novo coronary lesions in native vessels and challenging small vessel and long lesion subsets with TAXUS Liberté stents is unknown. This report examines the 3-year efficacy and safety from the TAXUS ATLAS program. METHODS AND RESULTS: TAXUS ATLAS WH, Small Vessel, and Long Lesion are non-randomized studies comparing TAXUS Liberté (n = 871), TAXUS Liberté 2.25 mm (n = 261), and TAXUS Liberté 38 mm (n = 150) stents, respectively, to case-matched TAXUS Express historical controls. TAXUS Liberté demonstrated comparable 3-year rates of major adverse cardiac events (19.0% vs. 20.2%, P = 0.51) in de novo lesions, reduced target lesion revascularization (TLR, 10.0% vs. 22.1%, P = 0.008) in small vessels, and reduced myocardial infarction (MI, 2.9% vs. 10.4%; P = 0.01) and stent thrombosis (ST, 0.0% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.03) in long lesions vs. TAXUS Express. After propensity score adjustment, no statistically significant effect of TAXUS Liberté on TLR (9.7% vs. 16.9%, P = 0.12) in small vessels or MI (2.9% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.05) in long lesions was noted, although reduced ST (0.0% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.02) remained in long lesions. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that TAXUS Liberté treatment significantly reduced TLR by 66% in small vessels, and MI by 75% in long lesions, vs. TAXUS Express. CONCLUSIONS: TAXUS Liberté suggests durable 3-year effectiveness in reducing restenosis and improved clinical outcomes in small vessels and long lesions compared with TAXUS Express.

Improved strut coverage and less late incomplete apposition with thin-strut TAXUS Liberté vs. TAXUS Express: the importance of stent platform design for drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) analysis was to evaluate the vascular response of the thin-strut TAXUS Liberté stent compared with the otherwise identical TAXUS Express stent. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The TAXUS ATLAS and TAXUS ATLAS Long Lesion studies are nonrandomized trials comparing the thin-strut TAXUS Liberté stent to historical TAXUS Express controls from the TAXUS IV and TAXUS V trials. A total of 377 patients enrolled in the two TAXUS ATLAS studies were randomly selected for the IVUS subset and compared to 314 TAXUS Express IVUS controls. RESULTS: Despite increased lesion complexity in the TAXUS Liberté group, neointimal formation at 9 months was similar in both stents (TAXUS Liberté 13.8±11.0%; TAXUS Express 13.1±13.8%, P=.56). However, this neointima covered more of the overall stent in the TAXUS Liberté (67.9±32.5%) compared with the TAXUS Express (54.4±37.2%, P<.001), suggesting more uniform neointimal distribution. TAXUS Liberté also showed less pronounced negative remodeling at both stent edges and had significantly less (4.3% vs. 9.6%, P=.04) late incomplete stent apposition (ISA). CONCLUSIONS: Despite identical polymer and drug release characteristic, the thin-strut TAXUS Liberté stent demonstrates improved neointimal coverage, better edge remodeling, and less late ISA vs. TAXUS Express, hereby highlighting the importance of the platform design for drug-eluting stents.

Long-term impact of routinely detected early and late incomplete stent apposition: an integrated intravascular ultrasound analysis of the TAXUS IV, V, and VI and TAXUS ATLAS workhorse, long lesion, and direct stent studies.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the 2-year impact of early and late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA) on clinical events. BACKGROUND: The late clinical impact of early or late-acquired ISA in bare-metal stents (BMS) and TAXUS stents (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) is debatable. METHODS: We evaluated 1,580 patients enrolled in the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudies of TAXUS IV, V, VI and TAXUS-ATLAS WH, LL, and DS trials. RESULTS: There were 96 cases of early ISA in 26 (7.2%) BMS patients, 35 (9.7%) TAXUS Express patients (p = 0.28 vs. BMS), and 35 (7.3%) TAXUS Liberté patients (p = 0.21 vs. TAXUS Express, and p = 1.00 vs. BMS). Major adverse cardiovascular events were similar at 9 months in patients with early ISA versus control subjects with no ISA for BMS (3.8% vs. 15.2%, p = 0.13) and for TAXUS (11.6% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.45). There was no impact of early ISA on stent thrombosis. At 9-month follow-up, there were 36 cases of late-acquired ISA in 7 (2.7%) BMS patients, 17 (3.1%) patients with TAXUS slow-release (TAXUS Express or TAXUS Liberté), and 12 (15.4%) patients receiving TAXUS moderate-release. Over 2 ensuing years, major adverse cardiovascular events were similar in patients with late-acquired ISA versus control subjects with no ISA for BMS (14.3% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.54), TAXUS (overall, 8.3% vs. 8.1% p = 0.87), or TAXUS slow-release formulation (0% vs. 7.9%, p = 0.28). There was no impact of late-acquired ISA on stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Neither routinely detected acute ISA nor routinely detected late-acquired ISA in BMS or TAXUS patients was associated with adverse clinical events over long-term follow-up.

Contemporary incidence and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after saphenous vein graft intervention with embolic protection (an AMEthyst trial substudy).

The incidence and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein grafts have not been evaluated in the era of routine embolic protection device (EPD) use and the current standards of antiplatelet therapy. The Assessment of the Medtronic AVE Interceptor Saphenous Vein Graft Filter System (AMEthyst) is the largest randomized trial of vein graft intervention comparing the Interceptor EPD and either the GuardWire or FilterWire EPD as the control. The baseline demographic, procedural, and clinical characteristics and the 30-day major adverse cardiac events ([MACE] death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization [either surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention] of the target vessel) were recorded for 748 patients who had undergone vein graft intervention with distal embolic protection. At 30 days, MACE had occurred in 58 patients (7.8%). The univariate predictors of MACE at 30 days included plaque volume (odds ratio 1.005/mm(3), p <0.0001), target lesion length (odds ratio 1.046/mm, p <0.001), vein graft degeneration score (odds ratio 1.631, p = 0.001), coronary narrowing classification (odds ratio 1.697, p = 0.004), reference vessel diameter (odds ratio 1.689, p = 0.004), and male gender (odds ratio 2.406, p = 0.046) and was independent of device type (p = 0.74). The plaque volume was the most important and only multivariate predictor of MACE. The highest quartile of plaque volume defined a subset at particular risk, despite EPD use (MACE 15.8% vs 5.0%, p <0.001). In conclusion, in a patient population in which EPD and preprocedure thienopyridine therapy were uniformly implemented, MACE occurred with an incidence of 7.8% at 30 days. An increasing plaque volume was the most important determinant of MACE and defined a population at particular risk.

The clinical impact of routine angiographic follow-up in randomized trials of drug-eluting stents: a critical assessment of "oculostenotic" reintervention in patients with intermediate lesions.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to study the long-term clinical effects of routine angiographic follow-up and related reintervention after drug-eluting stenting. BACKGROUND: Prior stent trials have shown that protocol-mandated angiographic follow-up increases repeat interventions compared with clinical follow-up alone. The long-term clinical impact of this practice is unknown. METHODS: Long-term outcomes of patients assigned to routine angiographic follow-up in 3 large-scale TAXUS (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) trials were compared with patients assigned to clinical follow-up alone, in a propensity score-adjusted patient-level meta-analysis. Outcomes were also compared in patients with treated versus untreated nonischemic intermediate lesions (quantitative angiographic stenosis between >or=40% and <70%) detected at angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: Target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates at 5 years were significantly higher in the angiographic compared with clinical follow-up cohort (18.3% vs. 11.1%, p < 0.001). This was due to more frequent treatment of intermediate lesions, but there was no associated reduction in rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (8.9% vs. 8.8%, p = 0.93). Of patients with nonischemic intermediate lesions, 17% who were not revascularized at the time of angiographic follow-up had a subsequent TLR, whereas 7% of patients who had TLR at this follow-up angiogram required additional revascularization during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of routine angiographic follow-up increases oculostenotic revascularization of nonischemic intermediate lesions without affecting subsequent rates of cardiac death or myocardial infarction, and TLR was not required in 83% of those lesions. A conservative approach, in which repeat angiography is limited to patients with recurrent ischemia or progressive symptoms, minimizes repeat revascularization of nonischemic intermediate lesions and optimizes long-term event-free survival after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Influence of sex on long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with the paclitaxel-eluting coronary stent: results of the "TAXUS Woman" analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted the "TAXUS Woman" analysis to assess the influence of sex on long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention using paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in a broad spectrum of patients. BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that the sex gap suggesting worse outcomes in women has narrowed. However, limited data are available on long-term sex-based outcomes with drug-eluting stents despite their extensive use in current practice. METHODS: We analyzed 2,271 PES-treated patients (women = 665), from 5 randomized trials and 7,492 PES-treated patients (women = 2,449) from 2 "real-world" registries. The trial and registry datasets were stratified by sex to compare long-term outcomes. Additionally, the outcomes in PES-treated women were compared with bare-metal stent-treated women (n = 395) in the randomized trials. RESULTS: In the randomized trials, PES-treated women had a lower target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate (11.5% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001) than bare-metal stent-treated women, with no significant sex-based differences in death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or TLR through 5 years. In both the trials and the registries, although women had more adverse baseline characteristics including advanced age, hypertension, and diabetes, they had similar outcomes to men. In expanded-use patients, however, women showed significantly higher rates of death and TLR, although only the higher TLR rate was confirmed by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study of nearly 10,000 patients including more than 3,000 women demonstrates that despite their higher-risk profile, women have comparable benefits to men from percutaneous coronary intervention with PES except for a slightly higher revascularization rate in the high-risk cohort.

Long-term paclitaxel-eluting stent outcomes in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Although drug-eluting stents have become a mainstay of percutaneous coronary intervention, information about drug-eluting stents outcomes in elderly patients is limited. Data from the paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) trials and registries were pooled to assess PES benefits relative to advancing patient age, including comparison with bare-metal stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from 5 randomized trials (2271 patients with PES, 1397 patients with bare-metal stents) and from 2 postmarket registries (7492 patients with PES) were pooled separately. Each dataset was stratified into age groups: <60, 60 to 70, and >70 years. At baseline, patients aged >70 years in both datasets had significantly more adverse characteristics than younger patients. Through 5 years, trial data showed that patients aged >70 years had higher death rates, but comparable rates of myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization with younger patients. Compared with patients with bare-metal stents, patients with PES aged >70 years had comparable rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis but a significantly lower target lesion revascularization rate (22.2 versus 10.2, P<0.001). These findings were echoed in the registry data through 2 years that showed that PES patients aged >70 years had significantly higher death rates, but lower myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and target lesion revascularization rates, compared with younger patients. Although the mortality rates of patients aged >70 years were higher than those of younger patients, they were comparable with those of age- and gender-matched norms in the general population. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of almost 10 000 patients demonstrated that percutaneous coronary intervention with PES is a safe and an effective treatment option that should not be withheld based on age.

Correlations between epicardial flow, microvascular reperfusion, infarct size and clinical outcomes in patients with anterior versus non-anterior myocardial infarction treated with primary or rescue angioplasty: analysis from the EMERALD trial.

AIMS: We compared epicardial and microvascular reperfusion, infarct size, and clinical outcomes after primary and rescue PCI with and without GuardWire distal protection in patients with LAD vs. non-LAD acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In the general AMI population undergoing primary PCI, the use of GuardWire did not yield higher reperfusion success, reduced infarct size, or enhanced event-free survival. Whether GuardWire is beneficial in patients with AMI in certain territories of the coronary circulation is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the EMERALD trial, 501 patients with AMI were randomised to PCI with vs. without distal protection. The outcomes were analysed as a function of culprit vessel (LAD vs. non-LAD) and the use of GuardWire. Patients with LAD vs. non-LAD infarcts had significantly (P< or =0.0001) lower rates of final TIMI flow grade 3 (85.2% vs. 94.4%), myocardial blush grade 3 (40.1% vs. 67.6%), and complete ST-segment resolution (35.1% vs. 79.6%). Patients with LAD infarcts also had larger infarct size (25.8+/-21.8% vs. 11.3_13.7%, p<0.0001) and a trend towards higher rates of 6-month mortality (5.5% vs. 2.1%, p=0.09) and new-onset severe heart failure (3.5% vs. 1.1%, p=0.08). Rates of reperfusion were not related to GuardWire use in patients with LAD infarcts. In patients with non-LAD infarcts, the use of GuardWire was associated with a trend towards better epicardial and microvascular reperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial infarction in the territory of the LAD is associated with worse epicardial and microvascular reperfusion and worse 6-month clinical outcomes. Use of the GuardWire showed a trend towards better epicardial and microvascular flow in patients with a non-LAD infarct-related artery.

Defining the length of stay following percutaneous coronary intervention: an expert consensus document from the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the most common method of coronary revascularization. Over time, as operator skills and technical advances have improved procedural outcomes, the length of stay (LOS) has decreased. However, standardization in the definition of LOS following PCI has been challenging due to significant physician, procedural, and patient variables. Given the increased focus on both patient safety as well as the cost of medical care, system process issues are a concern and provide a driving force for standardization while simultaneously maintaining the quality of patient care. This document: (1) provides a summary of the existing published data on same-day patient discharge following PCI, (2) reviews studies that developed methods to predict risk following PCI, and (3) provides clarification of the terms used to define care settings following PCI. In addition, a decision matrix is proposed for the care of patients following PCI. It is intended to provide both the interventional cardiologist as well as the facilities, in which they are associated, a guide to allow for the appropriate LOS for the appropriate patient who could be considered for early discharge or outpatient intervention.