ABSTRACT
For a long time the attention given to the hip fracture patient group was minor and without any certain consideration to their frailty. To improve the care for these patients Skane University Hospital in Lund has during the past 19 years worked actively with developing the care. This paper aims to describe what impact the care process development has had on functional outcome and mortality, as well as to analyze the impact of comorbidity and fracture type. METHODS: Patients older than 50 years with non-pathological cervical and trochanteric hip fracture admitted between Jan 1st 1999 and Dec 31st 2017 were included and data was retrieved from the National Quality Register for hip fracture patients, RIKSHÖFT. Variables regarding patient characteristics, fracture type, operation method, lead-times and outcome were analyzed. For comparison Fischer's exact test and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used for the categorical data and Pearson correlation coefficient for the continuous. To further analyze the effect over time a linear regression model was used. RESULTS: A total of 7827 patients were included. A significant shift in the overall morbidity was seen, with an increase in patients of higher ASA grade. No correlation was seen between outcome and the care process development. The mortality rate for the group as a whole the mortality rate had decreased over time. The total length of stay had decreased significantly over time. There was no statistically significant change in mortality rate over time when relating it to time-to-surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Although the patients display a higher morbidity over time, the mortality rate has not changed significantly, which might indicate an effect of the care process development. The care process development does not seem to impact on outcome as much as other factors. This study supports the possibility to create a more specific algorithm for hip fracture patients, taking specific subgroups into consideration.
Subject(s)
Hip Fractures/mortality , Process Assessment, Health Care , Registries , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Hip Fractures/surgery , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Sweden/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Nearly 18,000 individuals suffer from hip fracture in Sweden each year. The choice in operation method for femoral neck fractures has changed over the years as well as the overall management. Functional outcome after hip fracture is affected by several factors and the overall functional level for old people in Sweden has improved over the last decades. OBJECTIVE: To describe and analyse the functional outcome and choice of operation method for hip fracture patients between 1988 and 2012. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with cervical or trochanteric hip fracture treated at Lund University Hospital from 1988 until 2012 were collected from the National Quality Register for hip fracture patients, RIKSHÖFT. Patients younger than 50 years and those with pathological fractures were excluded. Data regarding patient characteristics, fracture type, operation method and housing, walking ability and use of walk aids prefracture and at 4-months follow-up was retrieved and analysed. RESULTS: For this study 8723 patients were included with a mean age of 81.6 (men 79.3, women 82.5). The mean age significantly increased over the period studied. Sliding hip screw dominates as method of choice for the trochanteric fractures. For the cervical fractures there is a clear shift from osteosynthesis to arthroplasty. There is a significant decrease in functional outcome at follow-up compared to prefracture. No significant trend change can be seen over 25 years. Functional outcome are worse for the patients with trochanteric fracture. CONCLUSION: Although there have been changes in operation methods for hip fractures and the management has developed, our study does not show any effect on functional outcome over a 25-year period. The medical condition of these patients with increasing age seems to counteract efforts to improve the care.
