ABSTRACT
The prevalence of antiHA was assessed in 594 hospital employees and in control groups comprising 932 "healthy" adults not working in the hospital, selected from different socioeconomic classes. Age specific antiHA prevalence which was lower in doctors than in nurses and ancillary staff, was also found to be lower in each group than in the respective controls, matched according to socioeconomic criteria. It is concluded that in our population (i.e. high risk area) the hospital environment does not involve an increased risk of HAV infection for personnel. However, precautions should be taken when working in high risk department, as this study demonstrated that a considerable proportion of health care workers (above all doctors) are still susceptible to Hepatitis A virus infection.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis A/immunology , Hepatitis B Surface Antigens/analysis , Occupational Diseases/immunology , Personnel, Hospital , Humans , Immunity , RiskABSTRACT
Sera from 3160 subjects without overt liver disease were tested for the presence of HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc. This group corresponds to a 4%, sample of the population resident in Padova and the surrounding district, selected according to sex and age distribution (in 5 to 5 year classes). The overall prevalence of HBV infection was 23%. The prevalence of HBsAg+ subjects was 3.2% higher in males than in females (3.8% v.s. 2.7%). Children under 5 years of age showed the maximum HBsAg carrier rate (7.3%), which was found to decrease with advancing age. Prevalence of anti-HBs is similar in both sexes (M 15.8% v.s. F 14.2%) and increases with age. Anti-HBc without HBsAg or anti-HBs was found in 4.6%, higher in males than in females (5.8% v.s. 3.6%). These result stress the importance of anti-HBc detection in HBV seroepidemiological surveys and suggest that HBV transmission within the household (both vertical and horizontal) plays a relevant role in HBV spread in our population.
