Proteomic identification of allergenic seed proteins, napin and cruciferin, from cold-pressed rapeseed oils.

In Finland and France atopic children commonly react to seeds of oilseed rape and turnip rape in skin prick tests (SPT) and open food challenges. These seeds are not as such in dietary use and therefore the routes of sensitization are unknown. Possible allergens were extracted from commercial cold-pressed and refined rapeseed oils and identified by gel-based tandem nanoflow liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Napin (a 2S albumin), earlier identified as a major allergen in the seeds of oilseed rape and turnip rape, and cruciferin (an 11S globulin), a new potential seed allergen, were detected in cold-pressed oils, but not in refined oils. Pooled sera from five children sensitized or allergic to oilseed rape and turnip rape seeds reacted to these proteins from cold-pressed oil preparations and individual sera from five children reacted to these proteins extracted from the seeds when examined with IgE immunoblotting. Hence cold-pressed rapeseed oil might be one possible route of sensitization for these allergens.

Sensitization to Malassezia in children with atopic dermatitis combined with food allergy.

BACKGROUND: The yeast Malassezia belongs to our normal cutaneous flora, but is capable of sensitizing individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD). Our objective was to investigate the prevalence of sensitization to Malassezia with a 10-yr follow-up among children suffering from AD combined with food allergy (FA) in relation to the extent of AD in infancy. METHODS: One hundred and eighty seven infants diagnosed with AD and milk/wheat allergy before 1 yr of age were included in the study. The area of AD was estimated from patient records of the first visit and measured with SCORAD at the 10-yr follow-up. Specific IgE against Malassezia was determined with ImmunoCAP™ at 11 yr of age. RESULTS: In infancy, 24 children (13%) were allergic to milk, 71 (38%) to wheat, and 92 (49%) to both milk and wheat, and 94 (50%) children had mild, 57 (30%) moderate and 36 (19%) severe AD. At the 10-yr follow-up visit, 19 (10%) of the children had ongoing milk and/or wheat allergy; 147 children (79%) had mild AD and 30 (16%) had SCORAD index of 0. Specific IgE against Malassezia mix was positive (≥0.35 kU/l) in 27% and specific IgE against M. sympodialis in 20% of the 187 children. The area of AD in infancy was associated with a greater risk of having allergen-specific IgE to Malassezia at the 10-yr follow-up. The risk ratio for FA was 3.11 (95% CI: 2.05-4.72; p < 0.001) if specific IgE to Malassezia was positive. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with severe AD and FA seem to have a greater risk of becoming sensitized to Malassezia during a 10-yr follow-up.

Sensitization and allergy to turnip rape: a comparison between the Finnish and French children with atopic dermatitis.

AIM: Finnish children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are frequently sensitized and show positive food challenge to turnip rape. We examined whether French children are also allergic to this oilseed plant and whether mustard could be the cross-reacting allergen. METHODS: Turnip rape and mustard challenge was performed to 14 Finnish and 14 French children with atopic dermatitis and positive skin prick test to turnip rape. Specific IgE antibodies were measured by ImmunoCAP and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: Open labial or oral challenge to turnip rape was positive in 14 (100%) Finnish and five (36%) French children and mustard challenge in five Finnish and five French children. IgE antibodies to oilseed rape and mustard were slightly more frequent in the Finnish (100% and 93%) than in the French (93% and 71%) children but rare (4%) in the 28 matched controls. The same findings were true for IgE antibodies to purified 2S albumin allergens, which showed similar cross-wise IgE inhibition patterns. CONCLUSION: French children with atopic dermatitis show IgE antibodies to turnip rape, oilseed rape and mustard similarly to the Finnish children. 2S albumin allergens in the seeds of these plants are highly cross-reactive and therefore, they all could be important sensitizers in children with atopic dermatitis.

Latex allergy: low prevalence of immunoglobulin E to highly purified proteins Hev b 2 and Hev b 13.

BACKGROUND: Hevea brasiliensis (Hev b) 2 and Hev b 13 have recently been identified as major latex allergens by detecting specific IgE antibodies in >50% of sera from Hev b latex-allergic individuals. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the prevalence rates for sensitization to extensively purified latex allergens in patients from three diverse geographical areas. METHODS: Native Hev b 2, Hev b 5, Hev b 6.01 and Hev b 13 were purified by non-denaturating chromatography and were used in ELISAs to assess sera from 215 latex-allergic patients and 172 atopic non-sensitized controls from Finland, Spain and the United States to detect allergen-specific IgE antibodies. RESULTS: Unexpectedly, even highly purified Hev b 13 contained epitope(s) to which Hev b 6-specific human IgE antibodies bound effectively. Further purification, however, reduced the prevalence of IgE antibody reactivity to low levels: 15%, 5% and 11% for Hev b 2, and 18%, 30% and 27% for Hev b 13 among latex-allergic Finnish, Spanish and American patients, respectively. Interestingly, Finnish patients had a lower prevalence of Hev b 5-specific IgE antibody (28%) as compared with Spanish (49%) and American (71%) patients. The prevalence of Hev b 6.01-specific IgE reactivity was uniformly >50% in all three populations. CONCLUSION: Neither Hev b 2 nor Hev b 13 appear to be major latex allergens when evaluated in serological assays using highly purified allergens. The reason(s) for the observed differences in published sensitization rates in various geographic regions requires further study. The purity of the allergen preparations has a marked impact on the accuracy of latex-specific IgE antibody detection in epidemiological studies and in the serological diagnosis of latex allergy.

Eczematous reactions to food in atopic eczema: position paper of the EAACI and GA2LEN.

Food allergy and atopic eczema (AE) may occur in the same patient. Besides typical immediate types of allergic reactions (i.e. noneczematous reactions) which are observed in patients suffering from AE, it is clear that foods, such as cow's milk and hen's eggs, can directly provoke flares of AE, particularly in sensitized infants. In general, inhaled allergens and pollen-related foods are of greater importance in older children, adolescents and adults. Clinical studies have revealed that more than 50% of affected children with AE that can be exacerbated by certain foods will react with a worsening of skin eczema either alone or in addition to immediate symptoms. Adolescents and adults may also react to foods, but reactions to 'classical' food allergens, such as hen's eggs and cow's milk, are not as common as in childhood. Some patients with AE do react to pollen-associated foods. Food-induced eczema should not be neglected by the allergologist: On the one hand, food can be a relevant trigger factor of persistent moderate-to-severe AE; on the other hand, unnecessary diets which are not based on a proper diagnosis may lead to malnutrition and additional psychological stress on patients suffering from AE. Eczematous reactions to food can only be diagnosed by a thorough diagnostic procedure, taking into account the patient's history, the degree of sensitization and the clinical relevance of the sensitization. The latter has often to be proven by oral food challenges. Upon oral food challenge it is most important to evaluate the status of the skin with an established score (e.g. SCORAD, EASI) after 24 h and later because otherwise worsening of eczema will be missed.

Latex allergy: the sum quantity of four major allergens shows the allergenic potential of medical gloves.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of allergenic potential of medical devices made of natural rubber latex (NRL) requires the measurement of concentrations of specific allergenic proteins or polypeptides eluting from rubber. METHODS: Four NRL allergens (Hev b 1, 3, 5, and 6.02) were quantified in all medical glove brands marketed in Finland in 1999, 2001, and 2003 (n = 208) by a capture enzyme immunoassay. The results were compared with those obtained from previous nationwide market surveys, using a skin prick test-validated human IgE-based ELISA-inhibition method. RESULTS: A high overall correlation (r = 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.90) emerged between the sum values of the four allergens(microg/g glove) and IgE-ELISA inhibition (allergen units, AU/ml, 1 : 5 diluted glove extract). The sum of four allergens when set at 0.15 microg/g discriminated 'low allergenic' (<10 AU/ml) from 'moderate- to high-allergenic' (>/=10 AU/ml) gloves at a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI 0.85-0.98) and specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.94). When the sum was below the detection limit (0.03 microg/g) all gloves belonged to the previously defined low-allergen category. CONCLUSIONS: By comparing the sum concentration of four selected NRL allergens with results obtained in human IgE-ELISA inhibition, it was possible set a cut-off level (0.15 microg/g) below which virtually all gloves contain low or insignificant amounts of allergens, and can be considered as low allergenic. At different cut-off-points, one could calculate the likelihood of a given glove to belong to the previously defined low, moderate or high allergen categories.

EAACI/GA2LEN position paper: present status of the atopy patch test.

A number of scientific reports have been published on patch tests with protein allergens performed on patients with atopic eczema (AE). Evaluation of eczematous skin lesions with an atopy patch test (APT) can be used as a diagnostic tool in characterizing patients with aeroallergen- and food-triggered AE. Indications for testing with APT, choice of allergens (aeroallergens and foods), test materials and technique, including present knowledge on sensitivity and specificity, are reviewed on the basis of available literature. This position paper also points out the need for future research on the clinical use of the APT.

Diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children and adults: European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology/American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology/PRACTALL Consensus Report.

There are remarkable differences in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of atopic dermatitis practiced by dermatologists and pediatricians in different countries. Therefore, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology nominated expert teams who were given the task of finding a consensus to serve as a guideline for clinical practice in Europe as well as in North America. The consensus report is part of the PRACTALL initiative, which is endorsed by both academies.

Turnip rape and oilseed rape are new potential food allergens in children with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: When skin prick testing (SPT) young children with atopic dermatitis (AD) for suspected food allergy, we frequently found positive reactions with turnip rape (Brassica rapa) and oilseed rape (Brassica napus). We performed food challenge to examine whether these children react clinically to turnip rape. METHODS: A total of 1887 children were screened with SPTs for sensitization to turnip rape and oilseed rape. Twenty-eight children with clearly positive SPT (> or =5 mm) were first subjected to labial challenge with turnip rape seeds followed, if negative, by open oral challenge for up to 7 days. Twenty-five children with AD but negative SPT to turnip rape and oilseed rape served as controls. RESULTS: Two-hundred and six (10.9%) children had positive SPT to turnip rape and/or oilseed rape. Twenty-five (89%) of 28 children showed a positive challenge reaction to turnip rape. Seventeen reacted with labial whealing, and eight in oral challenge with facial urticaria, flare-up of AD or abdominal symptoms. All 25 control children remained negative in the labial challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Turnip rape and oilseed rape seem to be new important food allergens in young children with AD. The modes of exposure to these allergens and the possible routes of sensitization remain to be established.

Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995-1997 and 2000-2002 in Finland--a multicentre study.

Contact sensitivity to cosmetics is common, but the sensitizing chemicals vary between countries and study periods. The present survey aimed at revealing the recent trends in patch test sensitivity with cosmetic chemicals in Finland. We report a retrospective multicentre survey of patch test reactions focusing on cosmetic-related substances and comparing the test results in 1995-97 with those in 2000-02. The most striking increases in the frequency of the patch test sensitivity were found with balsam of Peru and propolis from 4.0% to 6.2% (P < 0.001) and from 0.5% to 1.4% (P < 0.001), respectively, whereas the most prominent decreases were found with methylchloro/methylisothiazolinone and chlorhexidine diglugonate from 2.4% to 1.3% (P < 0.001) and from 1.2% to 0.5% (P < 0.001), respectively. The level of patch test sensitivity to methyldibromo glutaronitrile increased, although not significantly, from 1.0% to 1.5%. An increasing tendency was also found with hair dye chemicals 4-aminophenol and toluene-2,5-diamine or toluene-2,5-diamine sulfate from 1.3% to 3.8% and from 1.4% to 5.2%, respectively, while such a tendency was not found among permanent wave chemicals. The sensitivity level of fragrance mix remained the same (6% - 7%). We conclude that surveys revealing the state of sensitivity to cosmetic chemicals should be performed periodically in different countries.

Alpha/beta intraepithelial lymphocytes, serum gliadin antibodies and allergy test positivity in children.

AIM: To determine whether the amount of alphabeta-positive intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) is connected to allergy test positivity in children with gastrointestinal symptoms and whether elevated serum gliadin antibodies have any role in the diagnosis. METHODS: Twenty-seven children suffering from gastrointestinal-symptoms in whom intestinal biopsies had previously been obtained via endoscopy or with capsule biopsy to exclude coeliac disease were included into the study. The other inclusion criteria were increased amounts of CD3 and alphabeta-positive IELs with normal amounts of gammadelta-positive IELs in duodenal or jejunal biopsy specimens. At the control visit, the children underwent a physical examination and parents filled in a questionnaire concerning gastrointestinal- and atopic symptoms. Skin prick- and patch tests were done and serum gliadin, endomysium, transglutaminase antibodies and specific IgEs were measured. RESULTS: Only nine children (33%) had at least one positive result in the allergy tests, the rest remaining test negative. In children with digestive symptoms, IgG-class gliadin antibody titres were higher than those of the non-symptomatic children. A significant correlation was found between IgG-class gliadin antibodies and total amount of alphabeta-positive IELs (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: No positive skin test or specific IgE positivity for cereals in children with high intestinal T-cell densities was observed. The correlation between IgG-class gliadin antibodies and the total amount of alphabeta-TCR positive-cells is likely to be a reflection of local immune response of the gut.

"Atopy patch tests" in the diagnosis of delayed food hypersensitivity.

The prevalence of atopic diseases is increasing worldwide. Food allergies are the earliest manifestation of atopy. Atopic eczema affects about 18% of infants in the first 2 years of life and the main cause is allergy to multiple foods. A strong association has been shown between atopic eczema and IgE mediated allergy to milk, egg or peanut, but more than two-thirds of patients intolerant to food proteins have no evidence of IgE sensitization to the relevant food protein. Recently, patch testing with proteins has been found to be helpful in diagnosing food allergy in cases where skin prick tests and estimation of specific antibodies have failed. The methodology of atopy patch test (APT) is unstandardized, and contradictory results have been reported. In contrast to the more standardized APT methodology with aeroallergens, the sensitivities and specificities of food allergens can easily be estimated with food challenge tests. With multiallergic children adding of APTs to the skin prick tests and specific antibody estimation tests give more information for planning a wide enough elimination diet to get the skin and gastrointestinal tract symptomless in order to perform the challenge test which remains the only reliable test for food allergy. Standardization of the APT materials and reading procedure will add to the reliability of this new test method.

Positive skin and oral challenge responses to potato and occurrence of immunoglobulin E antibodies to patatin (Sol t 1) in infants with atopic dermatitis.

The clinical significance and molecular specificity of hypersensitivity reactions to raw and cooked potatoes remain ambiguous. We therefore investigated the clinical hypersensitivity to raw and cooked potato in infants suspected to have potato allergy and compared the findings with the occurrence of immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies to patatin (Sol t 1), characterized as the primary allergen of potato. Twelve infants (10 to 24 months of age) suffering from atopic dermatitis (AD) and suspected to have adverse reactions to potato, were examined. As a skin exposure test we used rubbing with both raw and cooked potato, and used open oral challenge with cooked potato for 7 days. A special eczema scoring system (SCORAD) was used to assess the severity of symptoms and signs of AD. Skin-prick tests (SPTs) were performed with raw potato and natural Sol t 1, and serological studies included measurement of total serum IgE and IgE antibodies to Sol t 1, and potato radioallergosorbent testing (RAST). The skin-rubbing test with raw potato was positive in seven (58%) and the oral challenge positive in eight (67%) infants. One infant presented with an immediate reaction and seven with a delayed reaction, i.e. exacerbation of AD, after oral challenge responses to cooked potato. Nine (75%) infants had IgE antibodies to Sol t 1 in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and SPT to natural Sol t 1 was positive in six (50%) potato-allergic infants. In conclusion, we observed positive challenge responses to both raw and cooked potato in food-allergic atopic infants. The presence of IgE antibodies and concomitant positive SPTs to the heat-stable potato allergen, Sol t 1, suggest that cooked potato can be an allergenic food for infants suffering from AD.

Identification of four novel potato (Solanum tuberosum) allergens belonging to the family of soybean trypsin inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: We have previously identified patatin (Sol t 1) of potato tubers as a major food allergen among atopic children. In addition to Sol t 1, concomitant IgE binding to other, then unidentified, potato proteins was observed. METHODS: Purification and identification of the putative allergens were done by both standard and advanced methods of protein chemistry. The patient series comprised 39 children with positive skin prick test (SPT) to raw potato. Immunoblotting and ELISA were used to examine IgE-binding ability and skin prick testing to assess in vivo reactivity of the purified potato proteins. RESULTS: Four IgE-binding potato proteins with molecular masses ranging from 16 to 20 kDa were purified and identified as cathepsin D-, cysteine-, and aspartic protease inhibitors belonging to the family of soybean trypsin inhibitors (Kunitz type). The proteins were designated Sol t 2, Sol t 3.0101, Sol t 3.0102, and Sol t 4. In ELISA, 51% of the sera of the 39 atopic children showed specific IgE to Sol t 2, 43% to Sol t 3.0101, 58% to Sol t 3.0102, and 67% to Sol t 4, respectively. All these four allergens were able to produce positive wheal-and-flare responses in SPT. CONCLUSION: In addition to Sol t 1, potato tubers contain several proteins belonging to the family of soybean trypsin inhibitors against which atopic children with positive SPT responses to raw potato have in vitro and in vivo reactive IgE antibodies.

A multicenter study of patch test reactions with dental screening series.

BACKGROUND: Dental products contain many allergens, and may cause problems both for patients undergoing dental treatment and for dental personnel because of occupational exposure. Individual patch test clinics may not study sufficient numbers of patients to collect reliable data on uncommon allergens. OBJECTIVE: To collect information on dental allergens based on a multicenter study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Finnish Contact Dermatitis Group tested more than 4,000 patients (for most allergens, 2,300 to 2,600 patients) with dental screening series. Conventional patch testing was performed. The total number and percentage of irritant (scored as irritant [IR] or doubtful [?]) and allergic (scored as +, ++, or +++) patch test reactions, respectively, were calculated, as well as the highest and lowest percentage of allergic patch test reactions recorded by the different patch test clinics. A reaction index (RI) was calculated, giving information on the irritancy of the patch test substances. RESULTS: The most frequent allergic patch test reactions were caused by nickel (14.6%), ammoniated mercury (13%), mercury (10.3%), gold (7.7%), benzoic acid (4.3%), palladium (4.2%) and cobalt (4.1%). 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2.8%) provoked most of the reactions caused by (meth)acrylates. Menthol, peppermint oil, ammonium tetrachloroplatinate, and amalgam alloying metals provoked no (neither allergic nor irritant) patch test reactions. CONCLUSION: Patch testing with allergens in the dental screening series, including (meth)acrylates and mercury, needs to be performed to detect contact allergy to dental products.

Natural rubber latex allergy in children: a follow-up study.

BACKGROUND: Natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy occurs frequently in children with spina bifida and other children with disorders requiring multiple operations. Also atopic children who have not undergone surgery can be sensitized to NRL, but the outcome of these children has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To study how NRL-allergic children manage at home and whether their skin prick test (SPT) reactivity, latex RAST or IgE antibody levels to NRL allergens change during the follow-up. METHODS: Twenty-four NRL-allergic children who had not undergone surgery and eight children with histories of multiple operations were followed up for a mean of 2.8 years. Clinical symptoms were recorded and all children were re-examined with SPT, latex RAST and ELISA for IgE antibodies to prohevein (Hev b 6.01), hevein (Hev b 6.02) and rubber elongation factor (REF, Hev b 1). RESULTS: Nineteen of the 24 NRL-allergic children (79%) who had not undergone surgery had occasionally contacts to balloons and other NRL products at home, and 10 of them experienced symptoms ranging from contact urticaria to systemic reactions. Three of the eight NRL-allergic children with a history of multiple operations had contacts to rubber balloons without any symptoms, and five children underwent 1-8 uneventful operations in a latex-free environment. SPT reactivity to NRL allergens, latex-RAST or IgE antibody levels to prohevein or hevein did not change in either group of NRL-allergic children during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence of clinical symptoms and no decrease in SPT reactivity or IgE levels to NRL allergens in the course of the present follow-up study imply that more attention should be paid to the protection of NRL-allergic children from rubber contacts in the home environment.

Intolerance to cereals is not specific for coeliac disease.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal complaints after ingestion of cereals are not uncommon. We assessed how reliable such a history is as a marker for the presence of overt coeliac disease, and whether we should also take into account latent coeliac disease and cereal allergy. METHODS: The study group comprised 93 consecutive adults from health centres spontaneously reporting abdominal symptoms after consumption of cereals. Small bowel mucosal morphology, CD3+, alphabeta+ and gammadelta+ intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), HLA DQ alleles and serum IgA-class endomysial (EmA), tissue transglutaminase (tTg) and gliadin (AGA) antibodies were determined. Skin prick and patch tests and serum radioallergosorbent tests for cereals were carried out. Thirty non-coeliac adults served as biopsy controls. RESULTS: Eight (9%) patients had coeliac disease and one mild partial villous atrophy. Altogether 17 had an increased density of gamma delta+ IELs without atrophy. However, only seven (8%) showed evidence of latent coeliac disease, i.e. both an increase in gammadelta+ IELs and the presence of coeliac disease-type HLA. One or more of the allergy tests for cereals was positive in 19; 9 adopted a gluten-free diet and abdominal symptoms were alleviated in all. In non-coeliac patients, serum EmA and tTg tests were negative in all, whereas AGA was seen in 40%. CONCLUSIONS: Intolerance to cereals is not a specific sign of overt or latent coeliac disease. All experimental dietary interventions before proper diagnosis of coeliac disease are therefore to be discouraged. Allergy to cereals, on the other hand, should be considered even in adults.