Asthma care practices, perceptions, and beliefs of Chicago-area primary-care physicians. Chicago Asthma Surveillance Initiative Project Team.

INTRODUCTION: Although primary-care physicians were a principal target audience for the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), there is little published information describing the postguideline asthma care practices of these physicians or their willingness to embrace the NAEPP guidelines. This study examines asthma care practices of Chicago-area primary-care physicians and assesses these practitioners' perceptions and beliefs about several aspects of the NAEPP guidelines. METHODS: In 1997, a self-administered survey was mailed to a randomly selected 10% sample of Chicago-area general pediatricians, internists, and family practitioners. RESULTS: Surveys were returned by 244 of the 405 eligible Chicago-area primary-care physicians (60.2%) in the sample. Of these, 66 (27.6%) were pediatricians, 83 (34.7%) were general internists, and 90 (37.7%) were family practitioners. Physicians reported that 54.6 +/- 2.7% (mean +/- SE) of patients with newly diagnosed asthma have spirometry performed as part of their initial evaluation. For patients with moderate persistent asthma, prescribing of inhaled corticosteroids varied by patient age, with 60.5% of physicians routinely prescribing them for patients < 5 years, compared with 95.7% of physicians prescribing them for patients > or = 5 years. Awareness of the NAEPP guide-lines among these physicians was high, with 88.5% reporting that they have heard of the guidelines, and 73.6% reporting having read them. Of patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma, physicians estimated that 47.7 +/- 2.7% were given written treatment plans. CONCLUSION: Several aspects of the NAEPP guidelines appear to have been incorporated into clinical practice by Chicago-area primary-care physicians, whereas other recommendations do not appear to have been readily adopted. This information suggests areas for interventions to improve primary care for asthma in the Chicago area.

Asthma care practices, perceptions, and beliefs of Chicago-area asthma specialists. Chicago Asthma Surveillance Initiative Project Team.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have closely explored how well physicians who consider themselves specialists in asthma adhere to national guideline recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of asthma. The purpose of this study is to characterize current knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and self-reported treatment practices of the asthma specialists working in one large metropolitan area. METHODS: In 1997, a cross-sectional survey was mailed to asthma specialists (allergists or pulmonologists) engaged in direct patient care with a practice location in the Chicago area (Cook County or one of the five surrounding counties). An approximately 50% random sample of asthma specialists was surveyed. The survey included items on (1) asthma diagnosis; (2) clinical monitoring of asthma patients; (3) pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic asthma treatment; (4) opinions and beliefs about asthma treatment options and reasons for referrals; (5) involvement in continuing medical education; (6) experiences with managed care; (7) use of asthma practice guidelines; (8) demographic information about the respondents; and (9) characteristics of the practice settings. RESULTS: A total of 113 eligible surveys were returned (response rate, 72.0%). Ninety-nine percent of the respondents indicated they would prescribe inhaled corticosteroids for patients > or = 5 years old with moderate persistent asthma, and 85.5% would prescribe them for patients < 5 years old. The respondents reported that 71.2% of their patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma were routinely given written treatment plans. The use of these plans was reported more frequently by allergists than pulmonologists (77.6% vs 58.9%, p = 0.01). Nearly half of the respondents were involved in the development of hospital-based asthma programs; fewer (14.9%) were involved in developing asthma programs for managed care organizations. A majority (63.4%) of the physicians had given a formal professional education presentation on asthma in the past year. A majority of the respondents who care for patients under managed care contracts reported that these patients have encountered barriers to access in seeking specialty care. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that asthma specialists in the Chicago area are providing asthma care that is, in many ways, consistent with national guidelines. However, there are also important differences in care that are not consistent with the guideline recommendations. Perhaps even more notable are differences in reported asthma care between the two subspecialty groups of allergists and pulmonologists. The effect of these differences on the management of persons with asthma is not known. It is hoped that information from this community-based survey will serve to catalyze discussions among Chicago-area asthma specialists as to how they might envision improving care for persons with asthma in their community.

Asthma care practices in Chicago-area emergency departments. Chicago Asthma Surveillance Initiative Project Team.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (EDs) represent an important source of asthma care, yet there are few studies detailing how ED asthma practices vary and to what extent EDs meet expectations of national asthma guidelines. The purpose of this study is to characterize ED care for persons with asthma in a single large community. METHODS: During 1996 and 1997, a cross-sectional, self-administered survey to characterize asthma care practices was conducted among medical directors of the 89 EDs serving the Chicago metropolitan area (six counties). The survey topic areas included asthma-specific demographics and selected utilization statistics; assessment practices; treatment practices; discharge and follow-up activities; and familiarity with, attitudes toward, and utilization of guidelines/ protocols. RESULTS: Sixty-four EDs completed surveys, for a response rate of 71.9%. Ninety-four percent of the respondents were ED medical directors. As part of assessment, peak flow measurements, while common, were used less frequently than pulse oximetry. The average (+/- SE) estimated length of stay for asthma care was 3.0 +/- 0.1 h, and average disposition time (ie, the decision to admit) was 2.5 +/- 0.2 h. Systemic steroids (either i.v. or p.o.) were estimated to be given to 73.2 +/- 3.9% of patients during their ED visits. Systemic steroids were prescribed for 55.9 +/- 3.5% of patients at time of discharge. Only 57.0 +/- 5.4% of patients were estimated to have received any type of written asthma educational materials. Approximately 25% of patients were reported to have been given a detailed follow-up appointment at the time of discharge. CONCLUSION: The results reveal that the medical directors reported many of the Chicago-area EDs as providing asthma care that is consistent with key aspects of national guidelines. However, in certain critical areas of care, the EDs demonstrate a high degree of variation, often with the community falling short of guideline recommendations. By identifying these variations in asthma care, it is now possible to target specific goals for community-wide asthma quality improvement among the EDs in the Chicago metropolitan area.

Development of a survey of asthma knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions: the Chicago Community Asthma Survey. Chicago Asthma Surveillance Initiative Project Team.

Little is known about the general public's perception of the diagnosis of asthma and the impact of asthma on individuals, their families, and their communities. In addition, there appear to be no published survey instruments specifically designed to gain insights into how the general public perceives asthma. The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of such an instrument, the Chicago Community Asthma Survey (CCAS)-32. Development began with two qualitative steps. First, a review of the published literature guided the initial instrument construction (Step 1). Content domains were chosen based on clinical input and the Health Belief Model. Most items were derived from existing instruments. To assess content validity, cognitive interviews and expert reviews were conducted (Step 2). Items were added, modified, and deleted based on the information gathered at each of these steps. In the next step, item performance measurement (Step 3), testing of two samples provided quantitative data to further inform item reduction. Items with uniform correct responses or responses lacking in variability were excluded. The result of this three-step process was a 32-item survey of asthma knowledge, attitudes and perceptions, the CCAS-32. The introduction to the survey was subsequently modified to minimize respondent bias (Step 4). In conclusion, the CCAS-32 was constructed with input from experts in asthma and individuals from the Chicago area. The items in the CCAS-32 appear to have both face validity and acceptable performance characteristics.