ABSTRACT
The patient in acute care settings can have severe emotional and physical stresses that are also experienced by family and significant others. The experience in a hospital has often been described as overwhelming; it can evoke feelings of fear, anger, helplessness, and isolation. Guided imagery, one of the most well-studied complementary therapies, is used increasingly to improve patients' experiences and healthcare outcomes. More and more, patients are relying on the use of guided imagery to provide a significant source of strength, support, and courage as they prepare for a procedure or manage the stresses of a hospital stay. This article provides a brief review of the research base for guided imagery and broad indications for its use. It describes key elements of the therapy and outlines steps to implement a program of guided imagery that can be used in variety of settings.
Subject(s)
Critical Care/methods , Critical Care/psychology , Holistic Nursing/methods , Imagery, Psychotherapy/methods , Acute Disease/nursing , Acute Disease/psychology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Critical Care/economics , Holistic Nursing/economics , Humans , Imagery, Psychotherapy/economics , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Program Development , Social SupportSubject(s)
Anxiety/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures/psychology , Imagery, Psychotherapy , Pain, Postoperative/psychology , Anxiety/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Data Collection , Humans , Length of Stay , Music Therapy , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of adjuvant guided imagery on patients with chronic tension-type headache. BACKGROUND: Management of chronic tension-type headache often requires a combination of pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies. Guided imagery is a relaxation technique based on visualizing pleasant images and body awareness. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine patients with chronic tension-type headache completed the Headache Disability Inventory and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form (SF-36) at their initial visit to a specialty headache center and again 1 month after the visit. In addition to individualized headache therapy, patients listened to a guided imagery audiocassette tape daily for the month. One hundred thirty-one control subjects received individualized therapy without guided imagery. RESULTS: Controls and the patients who listened to the guided imagery tape improved in headache frequency, headache severity, patient global assessment, quality of life, and disability caused by headache. More guided imagery patients (21.7%) than controls (7.6%) reported that their headaches were much better (P = .004). The guided imagery patients had significantly more improvement than the controls in three of the SF-36 domains: bodily pain (95% CI; guided imagery patients 11.0, controls 0.2), vitality (95% CI; guided imagery patients 10.9, controls 1.7), and mental health (95% CI; guided imagery patients 7.8, controls 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Guided imagery is an effective adjunct therapy for the management of chronic tension-type headache.
Subject(s)
Basal Ganglia/physiopathology , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Adult , Dopamine/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Neural Pathways/physiopathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Guided imagery uses the power of thought to influence psychologic and physiologic states. Some studies have shown that guided imagery can decrease anxiety, analgesic requirements, and length of stay for surgical patients. This study was designed to determine whether guided imagery in the perioperative period could improve the outcome of colorectal surgery patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized trial of patients undergoing their first elective colorectal surgery at a tertiary care center. Patients were randomly assigned into one of two groups. Group 1 received standard perioperative care, and Group 2 listened to a guided imagery tape three days preoperatively; a music-only tape during induction, during surgery, and postoperatively in the recovery room; a guided imagery tape during each of the first six postoperative days. Both groups had postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. All patients rated their levels of pain and anxiety daily, on a linear analog scale of 0 to 100. Total narcotic consumption, time to first bowel movement, length of stay, and number of patients with complications were also recorded. RESULTS: Groups were similar in age and gender distribution, diagnoses, and surgery performed. Median baseline anxiety score was 75 in both groups. Before surgery, anxiety increased in the control group but decreased in the guided imagery group (median change, 30; P < 0.001). Postoperatively, median increase in the worst pain score was 72.5 for the control group and 42.5 for the imagery group (P < 0.001). Least pain was also significantly different (P < 0.001), with a median increase of 30 for controls and 12.5 for the imagery group. Total opioid requirements were significantly lower in the imagery group, with a median of 185 mg vs. 326 mg in the control group (P < 0.001). Time to first bowel movement was significantly less in the imagery group (median, 58 hours) than in the control group (median, 92 hours; P < 0.001). The number of patients experiencing postoperative complications (nausea, vomiting, pruritus, or ileus) did not differ in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Guided imagery significantly reduces postoperative anxiety, pain, and narcotic requirements of colorectal surgery and increases patient satisfaction. Guided imagery is a simple and low-cost adjunct in the care of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
