Combined effects of lifestyle and psychosocial factors on central sensitization in patients with chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Central sensitization is one cause of chronic low back pain. Lifestyle and psychosocial factors are involved in the exacerbation of central sensitization. However, the combined effects of these factors on central sensitization in patients with chronic low back pain are unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the combined effects of lifestyle and psychosocial factors on central sensitization in patients with chronic low back pain. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. The participants were recruited from three orthopedic clinics for a total of 70 patients with chronic low back pain. Data were analyzed using hierarchical multiple regression analysis. In Model 1, lifestyle factors such as sleep quality, physical activity, sitting time, and perceived stress were included. Model 2 included psychosocial factors (pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and depression). RESULTS: The data showed that sleep (b = 0.30) and perceived stress (b = 0.47) were significantly correlated in Model 1, and anxiety (b = 0.41) and perceived stress (b = 0.27) were significantly correlated in Model 2. Furthermore, contributions from sleep (b = 0.14) decreased, and no significant correlations were observed. The coefficient of determination increased significantly from Model 1 to Model 2 (ΔR 2 = 0.12, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we clarified that perceived stress and anxiety were correlated with central sensitization in patients with chronic low back pain. In addition, sleep quality mediates anxiety and may be associated with central sensitization.

Reliability of measurements of hip abduction strength obtained with a hand-held dynamometer.

This study aimed to evaluate intrarater and interrater reliability when measuring hip abductor strength in the supine position using a hand-held dynamometer (HHD) (Study 1), and to elucidate the relationships between measured values and examiners' physical characteristics (Study 2). Three healthy examiners (1 female, 24 y.o. and 2 males 23 and 27 y.o) and 12 subjects (6 females, 24.5 ± 2.8 years and 6 males, 27.7 ± 3.5 years) participated in Study 1, and 20 healthy examiners (7 females, 22.3 ± 1.3 years and 13 males, 29.4 ± 8.2 years) and 2 subjects (1 female, 24 y.o. and 1 male 27 y.o) participated in Study 2. All healthy examiners were hospital employees. Hip abductor strength was measured by HHD with hand fixation and with belt fixation, and examiner age, sex, height, weight, BMI, and dominant hand grip strength were evaluated. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1,1), a measure of intrarater reliability, was 0.89-0.95 with hand fixation and 0.96-0.97 with belt fixation. ICC (2,1), a measure of interrater reliability, was 0.76-0.79 and 0.90-0.93, respectively. In subjects with high muscle strength (the examiner's hand was moved), the examiner's dominant hand grip strength affected muscle strength values with hand fixation (standardized partial regression coefficient = 0.78, determination coefficient R(2 )= 0.61, p < 0.01). In subjects with low muscle strength (the examiner's hand was not moved), no variables had effect. When the muscle strength of the subject is weak, both methods can be used. When the muscle strength of the subject is strong, it is necessary to adjust the value obtained by the examiner's dominant hand grip strength in the hand fixation method.

What predicts 36-item health survey version 2 after total hip arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the factors having the greatest effect on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, version 2 (SF-36v2) score after total hip arthroplasty (THA). DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Private 150-bed hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=659) who underwent initial THA for osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip between April 2007 and January 2009. A total of 138 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were seen at the first follow-up, while 108 patients were included in the second follow-up; all 30 patients excluded at the second follow-up underwent contralateral THA between follow-ups. The average time ± SD from surgery to first follow-up was 195.1±67.7 days, and that to second follow-up was 443.0±108.5 days. Patients' average age ± SD was 61.1±9.9 years at first follow-up and 61.3±10.3 years at second follow-up. Women accounted for 85.5% of patients at first follow-up and 85.2% at second follow-up. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Eight subscales of the SF-36v2, age, sex, body mass index, complications, living alone, contralateral hip OA, range of hip joint motion, walking aids, and preoperative mental health (MH) values from the SF-36v2. RESULTS: Canonical correlation analysis showed that contralateral hip OA had a major effect on the SF-36v2 score at the first follow-up. At the second follow-up, excluding the 30 patients who had undergone contralateral THA, physical function measured by the SF-36v2 was strongly affected by age, and other items were strongly affected by preoperative MH. CONCLUSIONS: When using the SF-36v2 as an assessment scale after THA, adjustments should be made for contralateral hip OA. Moreover, age and preoperative MH should also be considered.

A longitudinal study of the relationship between osteo sono-assessment index and lifestyle in elderly female in nursing homes.

The aim of this study was to investigate the longitudinal effect of mobility and daily activity, in the form of exercise and everyday activities, on the bones of 102 elderly female nursing home residents who had physical disabilities as well as marked postmenopausal bone loss, using calcaneal ultrasound apparatus for bone evaluation.Of the 102 subjects initially measured, 74 (mean age, 83.5±6.55 years; range, 64-99 years) could be measured again approximately one year later. The osteo sono-assessment index (OSI) in this study was determined using an ultrasound bone evaluation device. This device measures the speed of sound (SOS) and transmission index (TI) as ultrasound passes through the calcaneus. The OSI is calculated by computer analysis (OSI=TI×SOS(2)). For mobility, the OSI decreased significantly by an average of 1.8% after 11.8 months in all of the residents who were using a wheelchair (n=41, p<0.01). In contrast, the OSI rose significantly by a mean of 1.9% in the ambulatory group (n=33, p<0.01).The OSI increased significantly in residents who exercised every day, were out of bed for at least seven hours per day, and walked on a regular basis, suggesting that exercise, mainly in the form of walking, may increase the calcaneal OSI.