Needle anxiety in children with type 1 diabetes and their mothers.

PURPOSE: To report the prevalence of fear, distress, pain, and level of cooperation with insulin injections and blood glucose fingersticks in children with newly diagnosed diabetes and their mothers, and the association with diabetes control. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty-six subjects (23 children and mother pairs) completed the Perceptions of Insulin Shots and Fingersticks Survey at diagnosis and 6 to 9 months later. Standard descriptive statistics, Fisher's exact tests, and Spearman correlation coefficients were used to analyze the data. Scores were analyzed for associations with age and hemoglobin A1c as a marker of diabetes control. RESULTS: More young children as compared to older subjects reported fear and pain with injections and fingersticks. A high percentage of mothers reported high fear and distress with needles at diagnosis. Although most improve, 13.6% of mothers continued to report high fear and distress 6 to 9 months later. Mothers' continued report of high distress correlated with the poor cooperation of children, which correlated with poorer diabetes control. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Nurses should incorporate assessment and intervention for needle anxiety in children and parents at diagnosis of diabetes through informal interview or formal survey. Nurses can effectively incorporate coping strategies into their teaching of parents and children to administer injections and fingersticks.

Incidence of type 1 diabetes in Philadelphia is higher in black than white children from 1995 to 1999: epidemic or misclassification?

OBJECTIVE: To determine the epidemiology of type 1 diabetes in children in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from 1995 through 1999 and compare these data with previous cohorts. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a report of a retrospective population-based registry maintained since 1985. Hospital records meeting the following criteria were reviewed: newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes, age 0-14 years, residing in Philadelphia at the time of diagnosis, and diagnosed from 1 January 1995 to 31 December 1999. The secondary source of validation was the School District of Philadelphia. Incidence rates by race and age were compared with 1985-1989 and 1990-1994 cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 234 case subjects were identified, and the registry was determined to be 96% complete. The overall age-adjusted incidence rate in Philadelphia was 14.8 per 100,000/year. Incidence rates in Hispanic children (15.5 per 100,000/year) and white children (12.8 per 100,000/year) have been relatively stable over 15 years. The incidence in black children (15.2 per 100,000/year), however, has increased dramatically, rising 64% in children 5-9 years of age (14.9 per 100,000/year) and 37% in the 10- to 14-year age-group (26.9 per 100,000/year). CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of type 1 diabetes in Philadelphia is increasing and is similar to other U.S. registries. These are the first data reporting a higher incidence in black children in a registry of children 0-14 years of age. The etiology of the marked increase in incidence in the black population is unknown and underscores the need to establish type 1 diabetes as a reportable disease, so that environmental risk factors may be thoroughly investigated.

Parents' perceptions of factors that affect successful diabetes management for their children.

OBJECTIVE: To learn which factors parents perceive to be most influential in determining successful type 1 diabetes management. METHODS: A 4-stage mixed qualitative-quantitative method that consists of a series of focus groups, a survey, and in-depth interviews was used to ensure that parents generated, prioritized, and explained their own ideas. In each stage, parents offered a new level of insight into their perception of how children achieve good metabolic control while living as normal a life as possible. The survey responses were divided into statistically different ranks, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the results between subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 149 parents participated in the formative qualitative phases, 799 families (66%) responded to the parent-generated survey, and 67 explanatory interviews were conducted. The families who responded to the survey had children of varied ages (mean: 11.9 years; SD: 4.44) and diabetes control (mean hemoglobin A1c: 8.22%; SD: 1.65); 84.1% of respondents were white, 12.3% were black, and 89% were privately insured. The 30 survey items were statistically discriminated into 8 ranks. The items cover a wide range of categories, including concrete ways of achieving better control, families' or children's traits that affect coping ability, actions of the health care team that support versus undermine families' efforts, and the availability of community supports. No clear pattern emerged regarding 1 category that parents perceived to matter most. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians can affect many of the factors that parents perceive to make a difference in whether they can successfully raise a resilient child in good diabetes control. Future research needs to determine whether health care teams that address the concerns that parents raised in this study are more effective in guiding children to cope well with diabetes, to incorporate healthier lifestyles, and ultimately to achieve better metabolic control.

Education and telephone case management for children with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.

The purpose of the study was to compare three nursing interventions and their impact on glycemic control among children with type I diabetes. The 75 subjects' mean +/- SD age was 12.5 +/- 3.4 years, 55% were boys, and 55% were White. Subjects were randomly assigned to a standard care (SC), an education (ED), or an education and telephone case management (ED + TCM) group. The primary outcome measure was glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c, or HbA1c). Secondary outcome measures were diabetes knowledge (KNOW), parent-child teamwork (TEAM), and adherence (ADH). After 6 months of follow-up, results demonstrated no significant differences among groups in HbA1c. KNOW and TEAM scores improved slightly in the ED and ED + TCM groups, but no statistically significant differences were found among the three groups. Significant improvement in ADH scores among ED + TCM groups was reported when compared with the ED and SC groups. This change may represent a move toward improved adherence to diabetes care and subsequent improvement in diabetes control. The challenges of recruitment and retention of subjects in this study will also be discussed.