Energy beverages: content and safety.

Exercise is making a resurgence in many countries, given its benefits for fitness as well as prevention of obesity. This trend has spawned many supplements that purport to aid performance, muscle growth, and recovery. Initially, sports drinks were developed to provide electrolyte and carbohydrate replacement. Subsequently, energy beverages (EBs) containing stimulants and additives have appeared in most gyms and grocery stores and are being used increasingly by "weekend warriors" and those seeking an edge in an endurance event. Long-term exposure to the various components of EBs may result in significant alterations in the cardiovascular system, and the safety of EBs has not been fully established. For this review, we searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from 1976 through May 2010, using the following keywords: energy beverage, energy drink, power drink, exercise, caffeine, red bull, bitter orange, glucose, ginseng, guarana, and taurine. Evidence regarding the effects of EBs is summarized, and practical recommendations are made to help in answering the patient who asks, "Is it safe for me to drink an energy beverage when I exercise?"

Altitude and the heart: is going high safe for your cardiac patient?

Our aging population combined with the ease of travel and the interest in high altitude recreation pursuits exposes more patients to the acute physiologic effects of high altitude and lower oxygen availability. Acute exposure to high altitude is associated with significant alterations to the cardiovascular system. These may be important in patients with underlying cardiovascular disease who are not able to compensate to such physiologic changes. Exacerbating factors pertinent to patients with cardiovascular disease include acute hypoxia, increased myocardial work, increased epinephrine release, and increased pulmonary artery pressures. This review summarizes the physiology and clinical evidence regarding acute altitude exposure on the cardiopulmonary system with practical recommendations to address the question: "Is it safe for me to ski in the Rockies or climb Mt. Kilimanjaro?"

Results of a Phase II study of carboplatin plus gemcitabine in patients with untreated extensive small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate (RR) and survival produced by carboplatin + gemcitabine therapy in patients with untreated extensive small cell lung cancer (ESCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment consisted of carboplatin (AUC = 5) on day 1 and gemcitabine (1100 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle for 4 planned cycles (additional cycles allowed as per treating physician). ECOG performance status 0/1/2 was 29, 58, and 13%. Median age was 66.5 years (range: 41.3-83.1), 94% were white, and 50.7% were female. RESULTS: Between August 2000 and February 2002, 69 patients with ESCLC were enrolled. All 69 patients were included in the safety analysis, and 66 patients were evaluable for response. There were 2 CR (3.0%), 26 PR (39.5%), 23 SD (34.8%), and 15 PD (22.7%) resulting in a RR of 42.5%. The median survival was 9.2 months (range: <1-22.6), and the estimated 1-year survival was 33%. The median TTP was 3.9 months (range: <1-12.8), and the estimated 6-month progression free survival was 24%. The median duration of response was 3.8 months (range: 1.0-9.9). Out of 69 patients, 29, 3, and 16 received 4, 5, and 6 cycles of therapy, respectively. The major Grade 3, 4 toxicities included neutropenia (39.1%), thrombocytopenia (31.9%), anemia (13.0%), and fatigue (4.3%). CONCLUSION: This regimen resulted in survival data that was similar to other regimens for ESCLC and treatment appeared to be well tolerated. Gemcitabine in combination with carboplatin or other active drugs in ESCLC may be worth further investigation.

Results of a phase II study of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 2, or age > or = 70 years.

PURPOSE: To determine the 1-year survival, response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP), and safety of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (ESCLC) with an Eastern Cooperative Performance Status performance status (PS) of 2 or an age > or = 70 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with PC (paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the curve = 2) by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4-week cycle for up to six cycles. RESULTS: Between July 2000 and December 2001, 77 eligible patients (50.6% were male, 97.4% were white, 44.2% had PS of 2, with median age of 74 years) with ESCLC were enrolled. Among the 66 patients who were assessable for response, 25 responded to treatment (one complete response and 24 partial responses), for an objective RR of 38%. There were eight cases of stable disease (12.1%) and 33 cases of progressive disease (50%). The median survival was 7.2 months (range, < 1 to 24.4 months), and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 30%. The median TTP was 3.5 months (range, < 1 to 21.2 months), and the estimated 1-year progression-free survival rate was 8%. The median duration of response was 4.5 months (range, 1.6 to 17.5 months). One death (sepsis) was possibly related to the study drugs. Grades 3 and 4 toxicities experienced by > or = 5% of patients included neutropenia (22.1%), fatigue (8.6%), anemia (5.2%), and nausea/vomiting (5.2%). CONCLUSION: This regimen produced relatively few toxicities (only two of the 66 assessable patients received fewer than two cycles because of toxicity), and both the median and 1-year survival were similar to other regimens. This regimen may be a preferable treatment choice for patients with ESCLC who have a poor PS or who are aged > or = 70 years.