ABSTRACT
Prolactin may contribute to an atherogenic phenotype. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that prolactin levels increase in situations of acute stress and inflammation. We therefore aimed to investigate the relationship between prolactin, acute stress and inflammation in patients with myocardial infarction. We performed a case-control study in 40 patients with myocardial infarction and 39 controls, aged 41-84 years. Blood for assessment of prolactin and high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was drawn at inclusion, that is, during the acute phase of the event, and 2-3 weeks later. Unexpectedly, prolactin levels at inclusion did not differ between cases and controls (7.0 ng/ml and 6.0 ng/ml, respectively, p=0.28). 2-3 weeks later prolactin levels in cases had not decreased. However, univariate regression analysis indicated that hsCRP is associated with prolactin levels (regression coefficient ß 0.11; [95% CI 0.01; 0.21]; p=0.03) in cases during the acute phase of myocardial infarction. Our findings may suggest that prolactin is involved in the systemic inflammatory response, which takes place during myocardial infarction; however, this association may not be strong enough to induce higher prolactin levels in patients with myocardial infarction.
Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction/immunology , Prolactin/immunology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , C-Reactive Protein/immunology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a co-dominant monogenic disorder of lipoprotein metabolism, characterised by severely elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from birth onwards. Treatment of FH patients with cholesterol-lowering medication is mandatory to prevent premature cardiovascular disease (CVD). As a result of a nationwide screening in the Netherlands, a large group of women with FH in the child-bearing age range has been identified. Physicians are faced with a treatment dilemma if these females present either with a wish for pregnancy or an established pregnancy, since all systemically absorbed lipid-lowering medication is contraindicated during pregnancy. Currently, no evidence-based guidelines exist on the optimal clinical approach in these patients. Animal studies have shown conflicting data on potential teratogenicity of statins. In humans, there is no strong adverse safety signal, but prospective studies are lacking. The consequences of maternal hypercholesterolaemia during pregnancy for both mother and child are not well determined, although it has been suggested that it may increase the risk of CVD in the offspring. This review describes two representative cases from clinical practice, and discusses clinical considerations for treating pregnant FH patients supplemented with what is known from the literature.