Impact of age at first calving on performance traits in Irish beef herds.

Reducing age at first calving (AFC) has been a challenge in beef herds. There is anecdotal evidence that herd owners choose to calve heifers older because of the perceived consequences of calving heifers at 24 mo of age compared to 36 mo on performance traits in beef herds. The objective of this study was to estimate the association of calving heifers at younger ages on subsequent performance traits, calving interval, longevity, cow weight, dystocia, and progeny weaning weight for parities 1 to 5. Available to the study after data edits were 219,818 calving interval records, 219,818 longevity records, 118,504 cow live-weight records, 230,998 dystocia records, and 230,998 weaning weight records. Linear mixed models were used to quantify performance of each trait in AFC groups for each parity. As parity increased, there was a favorable reduction in calving interval and dystocia (P < 0.001), while the likelihood of cows surviving reduced (P < 0.001). Both cow live weight and progeny weaning weight increased as parity increased. Age at first calving only had a significant association with dystocia within parity 1 (P < 0.001), where older heifers at first calving subsequently had lower risk of calving. Calving interval for parity 1 cows was observed to be longer by 6 d in cows that calved for the first time at 33 to 36 mo compared to cows calved for the first time at 22 to 24 mo (P < 0.001). No statistical difference was observed for longevity between cows with an AFC of 22 to 24 mo compared to cows with an AFC of 33 to 36 mo (P > 0.05). Cows that calved at a younger age did wean lighter calves for their first three lactations (P < 0.01) but had no association with weaning weight for parity 4 and 5 cows (P > 0.05). Cows with a lower AFC were lighter for parity 1 to 4 (P < 0.001); at parity 5, AFC had no association with cow live weight (P > 0.05). The performance of mature cows for calving interval, longevity, calving difficulty, cow live weight, and weaning weight was not impacted by AFC. In conclusion, calving cows for the first time at younger ages do pose risks and associated performance loss but this risk and loss should be minimized by good management.

Reducing the age at first calving (AFC) in beef cows is known to be economically and environmentally beneficial for beef herds. The age of heifers at first calving is influenced by genetics and management. Additionally, beef herd owners choose to delay the breeding of young heifers because of the anecdotal perception that there is a higher risk of calving difficulty and potential negative consequences on lifetime performance of cows that calve at a younger age. This study aimed to estimate the potential risks and consequences of reducing AFC on beef herds which is known to economically beneficial. It was observed that cows that calved at younger ages were more likely to receive assistance at calving at their first calving. This negative consequence could be negated by good management and breeding decisions. In addition, younger calving cows weaned lighter calves for their first three lactations and had lighter cow live weights for their first four lactations. Overall, the impact of AFC was biologically small on key performance traits in beef herds. Results from this study should provide confidence to beef herd owners to calve cows for the first time at 24 mo of age.

Validation of a beef cattle maternal breeding objective based on a cross-sectional analysis of a large national cattle database.

Despite the importance of validating any technology prior to recommendation for use, few studies exist in the scientific literature which have demonstrated the superior performance of high-ranking animals in a given total merit index; this is especially true for maternal cattle selection indexes. The objective of the present study was to demonstrate the impact of the Irish total merit maternal-based index and provide the benefits of using the Irish total merit maternal-based beef index as part of a breeding policy. The validation exercise was undertaken using 269,407 records (which included the cow's own records and her progeny records) from 92,300 females differing in a total merit index for maternal value; a comparison was also made with the Irish terminal index. Association analyses were undertaken within the framework of linear and threshold mixed models; the traits analyzed were fertility (e.g., calving interval), slaughter (e.g., harvest weight), live weight (e.g., weaning weight), and producer-recorded traits (e.g., docility). All traits were analyzed with the maternal index and terminal index fitted as covariate(s) separately. Depending on the independent variable analyzed, the other fixed effects included: parity of cow, heterosis and recombination loss of cow and/or progeny, gender of progeny, and the estimated breeding value of the sire; contemporary group was included as a random effect. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of using total merit indexes to improve performance in a whole range of different traits, despite the often antagonistic genetic correlations among traits that underpin the index. Cows excelling on the maternal index had less calving difficulty, superior fertility performance, lighter carcasses, and live weight, as well as being more easily managed. Additionally, progeny of higher maternal index cows were lighter at birth and more docile albeit with a small impact on slaughter traits. In contrast, higher terminal index cows had more calving difficulty, compromised fertility and had heavier carcasses themselves as well as their progeny. While the differences in phenotypic performance between groups on maternal index was, in most instances, relatively small, the benefits are: (1) expected to be greater when more genetically extreme groups of animals are evaluated and (2) expected to accumulate over time given the cumulative and permanent properties of breeding schemes.

Carcass and efficiency metrics of beef cattle differ by whether the calf was born in a dairy or a beef herd.

Beef originates from the progeny of either dairy or beef dams. The objective of the present study was to identify contributing factors to the differences in the carcass merit of progeny from both dam types. This goal was achieved using slaughter records from 16,414 bucket-reared dairy animals (DXD), 5,407 bucket-reared dairy-beef animals (BXD), 42,102 suckle-reared animals from a beef × dairy F1 cross dam (BXF1), and 93,737 suckle-reared animals from a beef × beef cow (BXB). Linear mixed models were used to quantify the least squares means for carcass characteristics in the various progeny genotypes. Nuisance fixed effects adjusted for in the models were: animal heterosis and recombination loss, dam parity, age at slaughter, and contemporary group; age at slaughter was replaced as an independent variable with both carcass weight and carcass fat score where the dependent variable was age at slaughter. In a follow-up analysis, models were re-analyzed where the genetic merit of the sire was adjusted for; a further analysis set the genetic merit of the dam for the dependent variable to be identical for both the dairy and beef dams. The final analysis adjusted to a common sire and dam genetic merit facilitating the estimation of just differences in early-life rearing strategies. Irrespective of the genetic merit of the sire and dam, animals originating from beef herds had heavier and more conformed carcasses. BXB animals had a 67 kg heavier carcass, with a conformation score (scale 1 [poor] to 15 [excellent]) of 5 units greater compared with DXD animals. When the genetic merit of all dams was set to be equal, BXB animals were heavier and better conformed than BXD animals. When the genetic merit for both the sire and dam were set to be equal, carcasses of the BXB animals were 15 kg heavier, with a 0.69 unit superior conformation score compared with the DXD animals; this difference is due to early life experiences. In conclusion, the majority of the inferiority in carcass metrics of calves from dairy herds compared with beef herds is due to differences in the genetic merit of the parents. Nevertheless, even after adjusting the parents to the same genetic merit, progeny from dairy herds were still inferior to their contemporaries born in beef herds, due most likely to the persistence of early life experiences.

Genome-wide association study of endo-parasite phenotypes using imputed whole-genome sequence data in dairy and beef cattle.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative genetic studies suggest the existence of variation at the genome level that affects the ability of cattle to resist to parasitic diseases. The objective of the current study was to identify regions of the bovine genome that are associated with resistance to endo-parasites. METHODS: Individual cattle records were available for Fasciola hepatica-damaged liver from 18 abattoirs. Deregressed estimated breeding values (EBV) for F. hepatica-damaged liver were generated for genotyped animals with a record for F. hepatica-damaged liver and for genotyped sires with a least one progeny record for F. hepatica-damaged liver; 3702 animals were available. In addition, individual cow records for antibody response to F. hepatica on 6388 genotyped dairy cows, antibody response to Ostertagia ostertagi on 8334 genotyped dairy cows and antibody response to Neospora caninum on 4597 genotyped dairy cows were adjusted for non-genetic effects. Genotypes were imputed to whole-sequence; after edits, 14,190,141 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 16,603,644 SNPs were available for cattle with deregressed EBV for F. hepatica-damaged liver and cows with an antibody response to a parasitic disease, respectively. Association analyses were undertaken using linear regression on one SNP at a time, in which a genomic relationship matrix accounted for the relationships between animals. RESULTS: Genomic regions for F. hepatica-damaged liver were located on Bos taurus autosomes (BTA) 1, 8, 11, 16, 17 and 18; each region included at least one SNP with a p value lower than 10-6. Five SNPs were identified as significant (q value < 0.05) for antibody response to N. caninum and were located on BTA21 or 25. For antibody response to F. hepatica and O. ostertagi, six and nine quantitative trait loci (QTL) regions that included at least one SNP with a p value lower than 10-6 were identified, respectively. Gene set enrichment analysis revealed a significant association between functional annotations related to the olfactory system and QTL that were suggestively associated with endo-parasite phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: A number of novel genomic regions were suggestively associated with endo-parasite phenotypes across the bovine genome and two genomic regions on BTA21 and 25 were associated with antibody response to N. caninum.

Little genetic variability in resilience among cattle exists for a range of performance traits across herds in Ireland differing in Fasciola hepatica prevalence.

It is anticipated that in the future, livestock will be exposed to a greater risk of infection from parasitic diseases. Therefore, future breeding strategies for livestock, which are generally long-term strategies for change, should target animals adaptable to environments with a high parasitic load. Covariance components were estimated in the present study for a selection of dairy and beef performance traits over herd-years differing in Fasciola hepatica load using random regression sire models. Herd-year prevalence of F. hepatica was determined by using F. hepatica-damaged liver phenotypes which were recorded in abattoirs nationally. The data analyzed consisted up to 83,821 lactation records from dairy cows for a range of milk production and fertility traits, as well as 105,054 young animals with carcass-related information obtained at slaughter. Reaction norms for individual sires were derived from the random regression coefficients. The heritability and additive genetic standard deviations for all traits analyzed remained relatively constant as herd-year F. hepatica prevalence gradient increased up to a prevalence level of 0.7; although there was a large increase in heritability and additive genetic standard deviation for milk and fertility traits in the observed F. hepatica prevalence levels >0.7, only 5% of the data existed in herd-year prevalence levels >0.7. Very little rescaling, therefore, exists across differing herd-year F. hepatica prevalence levels. Within-trait genetic correlations among the performance traits across different herd-year F. hepatica prevalence levels were less than unity for all traits. Nevertheless, within-trait genetic correlations for milk production and carcass traits were all >0.8 for F. hepatica prevalence levels between 0.2 and 0.8. The lowest estimate of within-trait genetic correlations for the different fertility traits ranged from -0.03 (SE = 1.09) in age of first calving to 0.54 (SE = 0.22) for calving to first service interval. Therefore, there was reranking of sires for fertility traits across different F. hepatica prevalence levels. In conclusion, there was little or no genetic variability in sensitivity to F. hepatica prevalence levels among cattle for milk production and carcass traits. But, some genetic variability in sensitivity among dairy cows did exist for fertility traits measured across herds differing in F. hepatica prevalence.

Genetic correlations between endo-parasite phenotypes and economically important traits in dairy and beef cattle.

Parasitic diseases have economic consequences in cattle production systems. Although breeding for parasite resistance can complement current control practices to reduce the prevalence globally, there is little knowledge of the implications of such a strategy on other performance traits. Records on individual animal antibody responses to Fasciola hepatica, Ostertagia ostertagi, and Neospora caninum were available from cows in 68 dairy herds (study herds); national abattoir data on F. hepatica-damaged livers were also available from dairy and beef cattle. After data edits, 9,271 dairy cows remained in the study herd dataset, whereas 19,542 dairy cows and 68,048 young dairy and beef animals had a record for the presence or absence of F. hepatica-damaged liver in the national dataset. Milk, reproductive, and carcass phenotypes were also available for a proportion of these animals as well as their contemporaries. Linear mixed models were used to estimate variance components of antibody responses to the three parasites; covariance components were estimated between the parasite phenotypes and economically important traits. Heritability of antibody responses to the different parasites, when treated as a continuous trait, ranged from 0.07 (O. ostertagi) to 0.13 (F. hepatica), whereas the coefficient of genetic variation ranged from 4% (O. ostertagi) to 20% (F. hepatica). The antibody response to N. caninum was genetically correlated with the antibody response to both F. hepatica (-0.29) and O. ostertagi (-0.67); a moderately positive genetic correlation existed between the antibody response to F. hepatica and O. ostertagi (0.66). Genetic correlations between the parasite phenotypes and the milk production traits were all close to zero (-0.14 to 0.10), as were the genetic correlations between F. hepatica-damaged livers and the carcass traits of carcass weight, conformation, and fat score evaluated in cows and young animals (0.00 to 0.16). The genetic correlation between F. hepatica-damaged livers in cows and milk somatic cell score was 0.32 (SE = 0.20). Antibody responses to F. hepatica and O. ostertagi had favorable genetic correlations with fertility traits, but conversely, antibody response to N. caninum and F. hepatica-damaged livers were unfavorably genetically correlated with fertility. This study provides the necessary information to undertake national multitrait genetic evaluations for parasite phenotypes.