Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 70(15): 1919-1930, 2017 Oct 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28982506

ABSTRACT

Patients with heart failure (HF) and their families experience stress and suffering from a variety of sources over the course of the HF experience. Palliative care is an interdisciplinary service and an overall approach to care that improves quality of life and alleviates suffering for those living with serious illness, regardless of prognosis. In this review, we synthesize the evidence from randomized clinical trials of palliative care interventions in HF. While the evidence base for palliative care in HF is promising, it is still in its infancy and requires additional high-quality, methodologically sound studies to clearly elucidate the role of palliative care for patients and families living with the burdens of HF. Yet, an increase in attention to primary palliative care (e.g., basic physical and emotional symptom management, advance care planning), provided by primary care and cardiology clinicians, may be a vehicle to address unmet palliative needs earlier and throughout the illness course.


Subject(s)
Family Health , Heart Failure , Palliative Care , Patient Comfort , Quality of Life , Disease Progression , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Failure/psychology , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Palliative Care/psychology , Palliative Care/trends , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Severity of Illness Index
3.
Heart Lung ; 46(1): 24-29, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27871724

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To explore the perceptions of palliative care (PC) needs in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and their caregivers. BACKGROUND: IPF carries a poor prognosis with most patients succumbing to their illness at a rate comparable to aggressive cancers. No prior studies have comprehensively explored perceptions of PC needs from those currently living with the disease, caring for someone living with the disease, and who cared for a deceased family member. METHODS: Thematic analysis of focus group content was obtained from thirteen participants. RESULTS: Four themes described frustration with the diagnostic process and education received, overwhelming symptom burden, hesitance to engage in advance care planning, and comfort in receiving care from pulmonary specialty center because of resources. CONCLUSIONS: Findings support that patients and caregivers have informational needs and high symptom burden, but limited understanding of the potential benefits of PC. Future studies are needed to identify optimal ways to introduce early PC.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/standards , Family , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/therapy , Needs Assessment/standards , Palliative Care/standards , Quality of Health Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
4.
Lancet Respir Med ; 4(6): 473-526, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27185520

ABSTRACT

The burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the USA continues to grow. Although progress has been made in the the development of diagnostics, therapeutics, and care guidelines, whether patients' quality of life is improved will ultimately depend on the actual implementation of care and an individual patient's access to that care. In this Commission, we summarise expert opinion from key stakeholders-patients, caregivers, and medical professionals, as well as representatives from health systems, insurance companies, and industry-to understand barriers to care delivery and propose potential solutions. Health care in the USA is delivered through a patchwork of provider networks, with a wide variation in access to care depending on a patient's insurance, geographical location, and socioeconomic status. Furthermore, Medicare's complicated coverage and reimbursement structure pose unique challenges for patients with chronic respiratory disease who might need access to several types of services. Throughout this Commission, recurring themes include poor guideline implementation among health-care providers and poor patient access to key treatments such as affordable maintenance drugs and pulmonary rehabilitation. Although much attention has recently been focused on the reduction of hospital readmissions for COPD exacerbations, health systems in the USA struggle to meet these goals, and methods to reduce readmissions have not been proven. There are no easy solutions, but engaging patients and innovative thinkers in the development of solutions is crucial. Financial incentives might be important in raising engagement of providers and health systems. Lowering co-pays for maintenance drugs could result in improved adherence and, ultimately, decreased overall health-care spending. Given the substantial geographical diversity, health systems will need to find their own solutions to improve care coordination and integration, until better data for interventions that are universally effective become available.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/trends , Health Services Accessibility/trends , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Guideline Adherence/trends , Humans , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...