Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Retin Cases Brief Rep ; 11(1): 34-37, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26849382

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report long-term outcomes in patients with vitreomacular traction injected with intravitreal ocriplasmin. METHODS: Interventional case series. PATIENTS: A 64-year-old woman and a 46-year-old woman. RESULTS: In Case 1, a 64-year-old woman with focal vitreomacular traction with impending macular hole presented with a visual acuity of 20/80 +1 and was injected with ocriplasmin 11 days later. Visual acuity continued to improve and stabilized through 60 weeks of follow-up with a final visual acuity of 20/50. Vitreomacular traction release was confirmed by optical coherence tomography 6 weeks after injection.In Case 2, a 46-year-old woman with focal vitreomacular traction presented with a visual acuity of 20/60 and received ocriplasmin treatment the same day. Vitreomacular traction release was confirmed by optical coherence tomography 2 days later. After subsequent worsening of visual acuity, pneumatic retinopexy and pars plana vitrectomy were performed. Visual acuity continued to improve and stabilize throughout the 52-week follow-up with a final visual acuity of 20/25. CONCLUSION: We present here two patients with focal vitreomacular traction treated with ocriplasmin and followed up long-term for up to one year. In both cases, visual acuity improved compared with baseline and stabilized after ocriplasmin treatment. These cases add to the growing literature demonstrating resolution of symptoms after ocriplasmin treatment over longer follow-up periods.


Subject(s)
Fibrinolysin/administration & dosage , Peptide Fragments/administration & dosage , Retinal Diseases/drug therapy , Vitreous Detachment/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Middle Aged , Tissue Adhesions/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
Clin Ophthalmol ; 11: 31-38, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28031700

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One limitation of anti-VEGF therapy is the need for monthly retreatment to maintain efficacy. The purpose of this study was to determine the duration of effect in eyes with macular edema (ME) secondary to branch or central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO or CRVO) treated with anti-VEGF therapy plus sustained-release dexamethasone (DEX implant; Ozurdex). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This open-label, interventional case series included 62 eyes with ME due to RVO, central foveal thickness (CFT) >300 µm, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 or worse. Each treatment cycle included an anti-VEGF injection followed 2 weeks later with DEX implant. Patients were eligible for retreatment if CFT increased to >290 µm or increased by >50 µm from the lowest measurement, or if BCVA decreased by six or more Snellen letters. Efficacy and safety were evaluated 2 and 4-6 weeks after the beginning of each treatment cycle and every 4 weeks thereafter until retreatment criteria were met. The primary outcome measure was time to retreatment. Secondary outcome measures included BCVA, CFT, and safety parameters. RESULTS: The mean reinjection interval for all patients was 135.5±36.4 days. There was no statistically significant difference in mean intertreatment interval for up to six cycles of treatment or between eyes with BRVO or CRVO (P≥0.058). Mean peak change in BCVA was 13.8 letters, and 47.6% of eyes gained three or more lines of BCVA. The mean peak decrease in CFT across all treatment cycles was 200.9 µm for eyes with BRVO and 219.2 µm for eyes with CRVO. The percentage of patients with CFT ≤300 µm at any time during a given treatment cycle ranged from 78% to 94% among eyes with BRVO and from 85% to 100% among eyes with CRVO. Intraocular pressure increased in 19 of 62 eyes, and 26 of 44 phakic eyes underwent cataract surgery. CONCLUSION: In eyes with ME due to RVO, treatment with an anti-VEGF agent plus DEX implant provided a predictable duration of effect, as well as significant improvements in BCVA and CFT.

3.
F1000Res ; 52016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27303642

ABSTRACT

Diabetic macular edema is a serious visual complication of diabetic retinopathy. This article reviews the history of previous and current therapies, including laser therapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents, and corticosteroids, that have been used to treat this condition. In addition, it proposes new ways to use them in combination in order to decrease treatment burden and potentially address other causes besides vascular endothelial growth factor for diabetic macular edema.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...