Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Learn Mem ; 12(3): 352-9, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15897251

ABSTRACT

We tested the hypothesis that rapid eye movement (REM) sleep is important for complex associative learning by restricting rats from entering REM sleep for 4 h either immediately after training on an eight-box spatial task (0-4 REMr) or 4 h following training (4-8 REMr). Both groups of REM-restricted rats eventually reached the same overall performance level as did nonrestricted controls, but 0-4 REMr animals were delayed in their improvement in the first few days and lagged behind controls in the middle portion of the training period. More importantly, performance gains of 0-4 REMr rats depended more on simple local cues throughout the 15-d study since, unlike control and 4-8 REMr animals, their error rate increased after daily disruption of the relationship between local (intramaze) cues and the food reward. Thus, although overall performance was only subtly and transiently impaired, due to the ability to use alternate, nonspatial behavioral strategies, complex associative (spatial) learning was persistently impaired by restricting REM for a short critical period each day.


Subject(s)
Association Learning/physiology , Sleep Deprivation/psychology , Space Perception/physiology , Animals , Body Weight/physiology , Cues , Feeding Behavior/physiology , Maze Learning/physiology , Motivation , Motor Activity/physiology , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Rats , Rats, Inbred F344 , Swimming/physiology
2.
J Neurosci Methods ; 121(1): 65-74, 2002 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12393162

ABSTRACT

We developed a novel method for assessing spatial learning that is compatible with the requirements of electrophysiological recording of multiple single neurons. The behavioral task utilized a rectangular track with 8 reward boxes of which a subset contained available food (bait). Errors were scored whenever the rat investigated a non-baited box location (commission), failed to investigate a baited box location (omission), or hesitated in front of a non-baited box location (hesitation). Several controls encouraged the animal to solve the task through allocentric cues rather than through procedural strategies or simple local cue pairing. The learning curve for this task (3-5 d to criterion) was comparable to that of other spatial learning tasks when adequately motivated. The types of errors varied as the animal learned the task. Unlike other spatial learning tasks, the multi-box track allows many repeated samples of the same spatial coordinates within a short period of time to allow, for example, reliable determination of place fields while recording from hippocampal cells. Multiple trials per session also allow for high intensity training important for many learning assessments such as the timing and type of sleep involved in learning and memory.


Subject(s)
Memory/physiology , Space Perception/physiology , Analysis of Variance , Animals , Cues , Discrimination, Psychological/physiology , Electrophysiology/methods , Food Deprivation , Learning/physiology , Male , Maze Learning/physiology , Motor Activity/physiology , Rats , Rats, Inbred F344 , Reaction Time , Spatial Behavior/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...