Differential diagnosis of acute HBsAg positive hepatitis using IgM anti-HBc by a rapid, fully automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We determined the diagnostic significance of IgM anti-HBc by a rapid, fully automated microparticle enzyme immunoassay (IMx CORE-M) in acute HBsAg positive hepatitis. METHODS: We studied prospectively for at least 6 months 100 patients with acute self-limited hepatitis B (group A) and 40 patients with acute hepatitis superimposed on histologically confirmed chronic hepatitis B (group B). On admission, all patients in group A were positive and those in group B were negative for IgM anti-HBc by a commercially available enzyme immunoassay. RESULTS: Based on the assay criteria, the rates of IMx CORE-M (> 1.2) positive serum samples on admission, 4, 12 and 24 weeks later were: in group A: 100%, 95%, 72%, 44% and in group B: 20%, 27.5%, 17.5%, and 15%, respectively. Misclassification was observed in 20-27.5% of the acute on chronic hepatitis B cases. However, the mean IMx CORE-M index value was found to be significantly higher in group A during the whole follow-up. In particular, on admission the mean IMx CORE-M index value was 2.504 +/- 0.435 (range: 1.508-3.482) in group A and 0.747 +/- 0.346 (range: 0.062-1.384) in group B (p < 0.001). Discriminant function analysis showed that the cutoff level between the two groups for IMxCORE-M index on admission was 1.5. Four to 12 weeks from admission, in the group with acute on chronic hepatitis B cases, 13 patients with HDV and/or HCV superinfection had significantly lower IMx-CORE M index values compared with 27 patients with acute hepatitis due to exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B. CONCLUSIONS: IMx CORE-M appears to be an accurate diagnostic test to differentiate acute from acute on chronic HBsAg positive hepatitis, but the cut-off level seems to be higher (1.5 instead of 1.2).

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in haemodialysis patients. The Multicentre Haemodialysis Cohort Study on Viral Hepatitis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection among patients undergoing haemodialysis (HD) and to evaluate whether chronic haemodialysis is associated with an increased risk of HEV infection. METHODS: Serum samples from 420 HD patients and 316 healthy volunteers were tested for IgG and IgM antibodies to HEV (anti-HEV). Anti-HEV IgG positive sera were confirmed using synthetic peptides. RESULTS: Anti-HEV IgG was confirmed in 27/420 (6.4%) of the HD patients and in 7/316 (2. 2%) of the reference group (P=0.07). However, multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the prevalence of anti-HEV IgG was not significantly higher in HD patients compared with the reference group, after controlling for age and sex. No patient was found positive for anti-HEV IgM. The presence of anti-HEV was associated with sex in HD patients (P=0.04). No significant association was found between anti-HEV and underlying renal disease, anti-HCV, anti-HBc, blood transfusions, history of elevated transaminases, history of clinical hepatitis and renal transplantation. A marginal association, which was observed with the duration of haemodialysis in univariate analysis (P=0.07), was not confirmed in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic haemodialysis is not associated with an increased risk of exposure to HEV, and the high prevalence of anti-HEV IgG in HD patients reported in uncontrolled studies is possibly due to the confounding effect of age and sex.

Hepatitis E virus infection in individuals at high risk of transmission of non-A, non-B hepatitis and sexually transmitted diseases.

The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection among individuals at high risk of transmission of non-A, non-B hepatitis or sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and to evaluate whether they have an increased risk of exposure to HEV. Serum samples from 125 thalassemia patients, 300 intravenous drug users, 420 hemodialysis patients, 263 individuals with STDs, 47 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected homosexual men, and 316 healthy volunteers were tested for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and M (IgM) antibodies to HEV (anti-HEV) by enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) following a predetermined algorithm (Abbott Labs). Anti-HEV IgG was confirmed in 3/125 (2.4%) thalassemia patients, 5/300 (1.7%) intravenous drug users, 27/420 (6.4%) hemodialysis patients, 4/263 (1.5%) STD patients, 1/47 (2.1%) homosexual men, and 7/316 (2.2%) of the reference group. No patient was found positive for anti-HEV IgM. The higher prevalence which was observed in hemodialysis group was due to the confounding effect of age, as multivariate analysis showed. The anti-HEV prevalence increased significantly with age (p = 10(-4)). No significant association was found between anti-HEV, anti-HCV, and anti-HBc. In conclusion, individuals at high risk of non-A, non-B hepatitis and STDs have no increased risk of exposure to HEV and the higher prevalence of anti-HEV IgG among older subjects may be due to an epidemic form of HEV infection which occurred some decades ago, when the sanitary conditions in our country were poor.

Hepatitis E virus infection in a cohort of patients with acute non-A, non-B hepatitis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of hepatitis E virus infection in a cohort of patients with acute non-A, non-B hepatitis in Greece. METHODS: Serial serum samples of 198 patients with acute non-A, non-B hepatitis and a single serum specimen from 316 healthy subjects were tested for IgG and IgM antibodies to hepatitis E virus (anti-HEV). RESULTS: Anti-HEV IgG was found in 15/198 (7.6%) of acute non-A, non-B hepatitis patients and 7/316 (2.2%) of healthy controls (p=0.007). Anti-HEV IgM was found in 2/198 (1.0%) acute non-A, non-B hepatitis patients and in none of the healthy subjects. Neither anti-HEV IgM (+) case reported any risk factor and neither had travelled in areas endemic for hepatitis E virus infection. HEV-RNA was detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in one patient. The prevalence of anti-HEV IgG was 7/45 (15.6%), 1/46 (2.2%), 5/30 (16.7%) and 2/77 (2.6%) in acute non-A, non-B hepatitis reporting transfusion, intravenous drug use, occupational/hospitalization, and unknown transmission, respectively (p=0.007). Anti-HEV IgG was found in 13/122 (10.7%) and 2/76 (2.6%) of acute non-A, non-B hepatitis patients positive and negative for anti-HCV, respectively (p=0.03). A similar association was found with anti-HBc (p=0.007). The prevalence of anti-HEV IgG was significantly higher in cases reporting transfusion [OR=7.3, 95% C.I. 1.4-37.7, p=0.017] and occupational/hospitalization [OR=6.8, 95% C.I. 1.2-38.2, p=0.029], as transmission category after controlling for age. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that: (a) hepatitis E virus may be a cause - although not a frequent one - of sporadic or community-acquired acute non-A, non-B hepatitis in Greece; (b) hepatitis E virus may share transmission routes with hepatitis B and C viruses; and (c) the hypothesis that hepatitis E virus may be transmitted by parenteral routes deserves careful consideration.